Rotten Appells

I’m not interested in checking “Steve’s” work — his track record indicates poor quality workmanship, always biased in the same direction, with little reason to take it seriously.

– David Appell

What David is saying is that he is afraid to delve into my work exposing NOAA and NASA fraud – which is always biased towards alarmism and funding. If David understood what his heroes were doing, it would likely be devastating for him.


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Rotten Appells

  1. savebyj says:

    There you go! This is how Science works. Observation, reasoning, hypothesis, test, conclusion. Wait, no, cut out the Observation part. Yeah, and the reasoning thing. No need for a hypothesis as we already know the answer, so guess you really don’t need the testing part either. There you go! That’s how science works.

  2. Dear Steven Goddard,

    Real Science™ means taking your betters at their word. Also, Math is Racist.

  3. miked1947 says:

    David needs to check his track record. I have been dealing with him on line longer than I have been dealing with Steven and our Bad Appell is usually talking through his anal orifice. That is probably because he suffers from “Cranialanalinsertitis”. Which is a common condition among members of the Chicken Little Brigade.

  4. philjourdan says:

    Appell does not have the capacity to understand what his heroes are doing. Only the top leadership in any religion understand the inner workings of the smoke and mirrors. The minor prelates, of which Appell is one, only have blind faith.

    • Me says:

      Yep, He was asking someone way back for their data to prove the point they were making and I used the Jones famous line on him of “Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it.”
      That flew right over his head because his response was that’s not how science is done and Blah Blah Blah….. Classic coming from their side! 😆
      suyts had to point it out to him that hyprocracy, I was going to leave him hanging on it 😆

  5. gator69 says:

    “…poor quality workmanship, always biased in the same direction…”

    This reminds me of another entity, I cannot quite put my finger on it, but I believe it has something to do with that large sucking sound emanating from Manhattan.

  6. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    I’ve tried as a scientist to engage Dr Appell a number of times in a scientific discussion of climate data. When I do all I get is waffle in return. No attempts to address the data or even the papers. No attempt to provide countering data or papers. I regret this is modus operandi for many Team climatologists.

    People will listen politely to pundits saying woe, woe! But when the panhandle comes around they will equally politely pass on giving money. To get them to commit you have to convince them. Which ‘consensus’ people never do, they just shout woe, woe louder and louder.

  7. omanuel says:

    The Climate debate exposed, and it is now time to relax and enjoy this re-enactment of a classical play featuring Big Brother’s conflict with Reality !

    In the inevitable closing scene, Big Brother will learn to recite the prayer
    of the King of Siam in public:

    “O Waa Ta Goo Siam.”

    [The prayer automatically translates into English if repeated aloud several times and also cures the major illness of modern climatologists.]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s