Climate change is arguably the most important issue humanity has ever faced. The Earth’s average surface temperature continues to climb and weather is increasingly volatile. Our current trajectory looks perilous.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
Recent Comments
John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved! Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Ed Darrell on Phil Jones Removing The 1940…

Looks smaller as mole fraction.
A heads-up on what is coming down the track:
“Feds Buy Two Billion Rounds of Ammunition
It’s not the number of bullets we need to worry about but the number of feds with guns it takes to use those bullets. There are currently more than 70 different federal law enforcement agencies employing over 120,000 officers with arrest and firearms authority . . . That’s an increase of nearly 30 percent between 2004 and 2008. If the trends have continued upward at a relatively steady rate, that would put the total number of federal law enforcement officers at somewhere between 135,000 and 145,000. That’s a pretty staggering number, especially when you consider that there are only an estimated 765,000 state and local law enforcement officers. That means that about one in seven law enforcement officers in the country works directly for the federal government, not a local jurisdiction.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/02/17/Feds-Buy-2-Billion-Rounds-Of-Ammunition
Anyone see any problems with this?
YES!
Looks like Baretta is putting some pressure on Maryland concerning new gun control proposals. They might move the rest of their operations out of state.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/berettas-future-in-maryland-tied-to-states-gun-control-debate/2013/02/23/bcc56c62-7776-11e2-95e4-6148e45d7adb_story.html?hpid=z3
The data is back! Woohoo! I can finally access stations like these…
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=425001112800&dt=1&ds=14
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=425001169100&dt=1&ds=14
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=425001150790&dt=1&ds=14
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=425001157680&dt=1&ds=14
… that show flat to negative trends. They changed the address and it took me a minute to find it, but it is accessible for now… everyone should grab screen shots.
.00040 vs. .00035 is FAR worse than nuclear war, Hitler, black death, or even two billion rounds of ammunition. So you can only imagine what .00045 would be like!
Well, we certainly have to hand it to the Warmists. They’ve demonstrated an unfailing sense of comedy, although its surely not deliberate. Their fantastical and far-fetched predictions of catastrophic global warming I previously found annoying and ludicrous. But now I appreciate their comments simply for their entertainment value. The world needs a good collective laugh.
Right. We don’t call them fearmongers for nothing. Their never ending predictions of doom would be only laughable if in fact a lot of people aren’t still scared to death by them. Why do they keep repeating over and over like a broken record the same bs? Their own words:
“The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe.” -Daniel Botkin, ex Chair of Environmental Studies, UCSB
“Only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians’ — and readers’ — attention…and thus more federal financing.” -Monika Kopacz, Atmospheric Scientist
“Unless we announce disasters no one will listen.” -Sir John Houghton, first chairman of IPCC
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis.” -David Rockefeller, Club of Rome
“This is a political game. It has nothing to do with science.” -Sherry Neddick, Greenpeace
“I believe it is appropriate to have an ‘over-representation’ of … how dangerous it is.” -Al Gore
“We have to offer up scary scenarios… each of us has to decide the right balance between being effective [lying] and being honest [ineffective].” -Stephen Schneider, lead ipcc author, 1989
“I would freely admit that on [global warming] we have crossed the boundary from news reporting to advocacy.” -Charles Alexander, Time Magazine Science Editor
I really liked the “About 30% of energy is reflected, creating a net incoming energy of 70% of 1.743 x 10e17 Watts, or 1.22 x 10e17 Watts.” part …
“about 30%” ?
why not “about 25%” ? or “about 40%” ?
because a convenient ” T ” follows ?
how can these people call this “science” ?
The volatile headlines and missed predictions evaporate into the ether, never to hold anyone accountable. The wronger Hansen is, the more he is rewarded…
Never have so many paid so much for so little in return…