If It Is Basic Physics, Why Are Their Forecasts So Poor?

“the basic physics of climate change is irrefutable”.

Ed Davey, Secretary of State for Energy & Climate Change

If the physics are so simple, why are temperatures below Hansen’s zero emissions Scenario C?

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to If It Is Basic Physics, Why Are Their Forecasts So Poor?

  1. omnologos says:

    Raypierre tried the same flawed arguments with me on the NYT comment sections once.

    I replied that basic physics tells us warm air rises above cold air. This would make them predict the top of Mount Everest to be among the warmest places on Earth.

    Ps Aristotle with their same reasoning thoughts Earth surrounded by a sphere of fire..

  2. Glacierman says:

    Because they have got something wrong and are fighting to not have to admit it.

  3. Billy Liar says:

    Emissions are negative? Immissions?

  4. Jusat Joe says:

    If it’s basic physics why do they have to create all of the speculative Rube Goldberg schemes of positive feedbacks and tipping points?

  5. Ben says:

    basic physics + incomplete understanding = failed predictions/projections

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s