Obama Bases His Second Term Agenda Around Junk Science Propagated By A Small Group Of Corrupt Scientists

“We can choose to believe that Superstorm Sandy, and the most severe drought in decades, and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen were all just a freak coincidence.  Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science — and act before it’s too late,”

What Obama meant by the “overwhelming judgment of science” is the unsupportable claims of a small group of corrupt scientists, who have been repeatedly exposed.

ScreenHunter_193 Mar. 14 06.33

Principia Scientific Intl – Principia Scientific Intl

This is reminiscent of the approach taken by the leader of Germany during the 1930s.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Obama Bases His Second Term Agenda Around Junk Science Propagated By A Small Group Of Corrupt Scientists

  1. gator69 says:

    “We can choose to believe that Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of my administration — and act like it was a protest over a video.”

    “We can choose to believe that I was born in Kenya, that I am the biggest liar in decades, and the worst president in the history of the United States. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of press corpse— and elect me to a third term.”

  2. kbray in california says:

    The storm has drowned all our children,
    all our cattle have starved to death,
    and our town has burned to the ground.

    ” We better do something before it’s too late ! “

  3. GeologyJim says:

    Conversely, FOIA is a genuine hero for blowing the whistle on this massive scam IMHO

    In FOIA’s Climategate III “release” statement, I particularly liked this part:

    “We can’t pour trillions in this massive hole-digging-and-filling-up endeavor and pretend it’s not [taking] away from something and someone else.

    “If the economy of a region, a country, a city, etc. deteriorates, what happens among the poorest? Does that usually improve their prospects? No, they will take the hardest hit. No amount of magical climate thinking can turn this one upside-down.

    “It’s easy for many of us in the western world to accept a tiny green inconvenience and then wallow in that righteous feeling, surrounded by our “clean” technology and energy that is only slightly more expensive if adequately subsidized.

    “Those millions and billions already struggling with malnutrition, sickness, violence, illiteracy, etc. don’t have that luxury. The price of “climate protection” with its cumulative and collateral effects is bound to destroy and debilitate in great numbers, for decades and generations.”

    The preening Obama pretends that only he “looks out for the little people”. Gag me.

    • gator69 says:

      Socialist dictators are seldom concerned over ‘collateral damage’, as the ends justifies the means in their warped heads.

    • greg2213 says:

      And yet, the little people are the ones most heavily damaged by the economic/energy changes brought on by climate concerns. “We had to destroy the little people (esp. the brown and black ones) in order to save them.”

  4. Ben says:

    Steven,

    The next time you rank best to worst in a climate category like “hottest summer”, don’t put the year labels on the axis. Let Obama, his cracked team, or local reps guess the year labels.

    Comedy gold…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s