My Response To Katherine

ScreenHunter_197 Mar. 26 14.25

ScreenHunter_197 Mar. 26 16.18

Twitter / KHayhoe: @th3Derek @afreedma …

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to My Response To Katherine

  1. Andy DC says:

    Don’t expect Katharine to appreciate your sense of humor either. But if it takes 49 alarmists to debate one skeptic, it does not not make the alarmists look particularly bright. Maybe it also takes 49 alarmists to change a lightbulb.

    • gator69 says:

      What, one to hold the bulb, and 48 to come to a consensus that it has been changed?

      • One to measure the light output, 12 to create new models showing that the photons don’t really exist, 12 to find paleo evidence of a hockey stick in the bulb’s output in geologic records, 12 to garner more research, and 12 to ban light bulbs.

      • miked1947 says:

        One holds the bulb and the others take turns revolving the one holding the light bulb. That would be a 20 year project as each group thins they know which is the proper method of rotation!

      • Dave N says:

        Best. Comment. Ever.

        Well.. this week 😉

  2. DrFurst Dunaharm says:

    Not a fair fight…. they need another 50 warmists to even the sides.

  3. TomC says:

    I accept the offer and will up the ante 8 more climate scientists to equal the same number of states our country has.

  4. Robertv says:

    di 26 mrt 2013, 14:00 | 136 reacties
    Koude lente door smeltend poolijs Cold spring because of melting polar ice

    http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/21422627/__Kou_door_smeltend_poolijs__.html

    All 136 react with something like ‘Global warming is BS’

    Normal people get it

  5. gator69 says:

    Looks like the team had a huddle.

    Manntwit tweets…

    “Getting on a debate stage signals that, while you might disagree, you respect the position of your opponent. #WhyWeDontDebateScienceDeniers”

    http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2013/03/michael-debate-mann-trying-to-excuse.html

    Criminals rarely respect the law, and liars seldom respect the truth.

    • papertiger says:

      That’s like the 3rd or 4th time the Manntwit or his acolytes, without the bidding of the skeptical community, have deflected unreported calls for debate, from parties unknown.

      The perils of twitter. Even those precious few he lets through the blocking device, tried and true comrades one and all, even they are calling for Mann to man up.

      lol

  6. Justa Joe says:

    So Hayhoe views “climate change” as a sort of popularity contest, and she’s in with the popular crowd. This is very illustrative of her capacity for logical thought.

  7. Traitor In Chief says:

    They could bring 49, or 4900, no matter. They lost the debate because their arguments were pathetic. They should focus on capturing a purple unicorn.

  8. Neo says:

    So, how many “climate scientists” does it take to screw in a light bulb ?

  9. The purple unicorn was modeled with hockey sticks for legs – good enough for government work, huh…

  10. Hugh K says:

    As reported on NPR website — “What would Jesus do on a warming planet? That’s easy, Hayhoe says. Jesus “told us to love our neighbor as ourselves….”

    So, it seems Hayhoe is a Christian (full disclosure — so am I). – Utilizing Hayoe’s apparent logic in her above tweet that any debate with a lone climate realist would require a much larger number of alarmists based on the supposed value of a consensus, I would love to hear Hayhoe’s response to the following question; Recalling that many Christian Churches around the world last Sunday listened to the Gospel reading of the crowd (read consensus) vigorously choosing the life of the thief/anarchist Barabbas over the life of the innocent Jesus, do you (Hayhoe) still believe that a consensus is the best method for basing your opinion?

  11. kirkmyers says:

    How can a woman of Hayoe’s so-called scientific credentials take so much pride in her own ignorance? Has she taken the time to study the temperature trend over the past decade-plus? If so, why does she continue to sound the alarm about a “global warming” problem that is non-existent. There has been no warming for 16 years. In fact, there has been a slight cooling trend since 2002.

    It is the unbridled greed of Warmist scientists that has kept the global warming scare alive — and their departments flush with research funds — and should be condemned. It is the skeptics who are actually practicing sound science and using the scientific method.

    The only way that NASA GISS and NOAA NCDC can find a warming signal is by inventing it through the creative manipulation of temperature data. With each passing day, there are increasing indications that we may be on the cusp of another Little Ice Age, and all the alarmist scientists can do is scream about and wave fingers at an imaginary bogeyman called “climate change,” one of the silliest and meaningless expressions employed by global warming Chicken Littles.

Leave a Reply to Michael D Smith Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s