Helping those of us with brains understand how Liberal Logic works | Liberal Logic 101
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved! Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Ed Darrell on Phil Jones Removing The 1940…
Wow … that chick on the right looks like a younger Bill McKrackpot. Hmmm, maybe in his younger days William was Wilma McKrackpot?
Sadly, this is what they believe.
Sounds just like the nightly broadcast news, Letterman, Madonna, Chris Matthews, Ed Schultz, Rachel Maddow, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, O-Butt-head, any Kennedy, Greenpeace, WWF, etc., etc.
Ho-hum
My opinion about abortion: Why should I be made to pay with my tax dollars for the stupidity and moral turpitude of teenage girls/welfare mothers who have no capacity to support themselves, let alone support their children?
I agree Andy, and taxpayers should have oversight veto regarding where the revenue can be spent.
But these young mothers have the babies to allow them to qualify for section 8 housing, welfare, food stamps, medicaid, WIC, etc. If they have a crack baby that does poorly in school (no surprise), they are deemed “disabled” and qualify to get an extra $1,000 per month per “disabled” baby here in California. Babies are their meal ticket, for life.
My brother had a renter who received $9,000 per month, and she was here illegally and owned a nice new car for all those kids. This is Liberal Insanity.
The behavior is similar to in India where they cut off a hand of a child for sympathy for begging income. It is all a perversion and an evil manipulation of the gift of life.
diversity (n.)
mid-14c., “quality of being diverse,” mostly in a neutral sense, from Old French diversité (12c.) “difference, diversity, unique feature, oddness:” also “wickedness, perversity,” from Latin diversitatem (nominative diversitas) “contrariety, contradiction, disagreement;” also, as a secondary sense, “difference, diversity,” from diversus “turned different ways” (in Late Latin “various”), past participle of divertere (see divert).
Negative meaning, “being contrary to what is agreeable or right; perversity, evil” existed in English from late 15c. but was obsolete from 17c. Diversity as a virtue in a nation is an idea from the rise of modern democracies in the 1790s, where it kept one faction from arrogating all power (but this was not quite the modern sense, as ethnicity, gender, sexual identity, etc. were not the qualities in mind):
The dissimilarity in the ingredients which will compose the national government, and still more in the manner in which they will be brought into action in its various branches, must form a powerful obstacle to a concert of views in any partial scheme of elections. There is sufficient diversity in the state of property, in the genius, manners, and habits of the people of the different parts of the Union, to occasion a material diversity of disposition in their representatives towards the different ranks and conditions in society. [“Federalist” #60, Feb. 26, 1788 (Hamilton)]
Specific focus (in a positive sense) on race, gender, etc. is from 1992.
from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=diversity
I would call that ‘leftist logic’. Liberals believe in liberty, and not collectivism. Progressives like dressing up as liberals and trapping the unwary.