Fraudster And Thief Says That Honesty Tarnishes A Scientist’s Reputation

screen-shot-2013-04-05-at-4-52-12-pm

Peter Gleick: Freeman Dyson’s climate views ‘will forever tarnish and diminish his legacy’ | JunkScience.com

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Fraudster And Thief Says That Honesty Tarnishes A Scientist’s Reputation

  1. gator69 says:

    What would Gleickhead know about smart people?

  2. nigelf says:

    These two are small petty men and they continue to show it every day. I would love to be a fly on the wall when they first encounter their huge cellmates upon starting their long sentences for fraud.

  3. Brian G Valentine says:

    Not one well-known “denier” as identified by Inhofe and others, has ever had their integrity called into question for some deceitful behavior, as far as I know.

    Trolls out there – can you identify any of them?

  4. daveburton says:

    Hilarious to see an identity thief, serial liar, and probable forger fret about the reputation of America’s greatest living physicist.

  5. squid2112 says:

    OMG! … hahaha … ROFLMAO … Gleick actually tweated “smart people aren’t always smart about everything”? … Just when I thought Gleick is about the dumbest creature on the planet, he goes and proves me right. …. PRICELESS! … ROFLMAO…

  6. squid2112 says:

    These two just remind me of dumb and dumber …

  7. Sundance says:

    I read that one of the Enron execs, Skilling I think, is due to be released from jail so the CAGW mafia should be pleased. 🙂

  8. Robertv says:

    Freeman Dyson: Heretical Thoughts About Science and Society

  9. tckev says:

    The more these two twit?, twet?, tweet?, twitter? the more childish and puerile they appear.

  10. Owen says:

    These two clowns aren’t good enough to shine Dyson’s shoes let alone make judgement on his intellectual abilities. If they weren’t so pathetic it would funny.

  11. kirkmyers says:

    Two global warming fraudsters calling Dyson’s integrity into question. Their comments positively drip with hypocrisy.

  12. Chuck L says:

    Whose reputations are being tarnished and diminished? Gavin & Gleick might want to look in a mirror.

  13. Stephen Richards says:

    Tweedle dee and Tweedle Dum.

  14. Fred from Canuckistan . . . says:

    Gavin & Gleik.

    Twitter Dumb Dumb & Twitter Dumber Dumber.

    Still think Gavin should be fired and have his pension nullified for the terrible outcomes in public policy that have resulted from his full throated support for fear mongering climate hysteria ideas, lunacies and campaigns.

  15. According to the Pacific Institute,

    Dr. Gleick’s work has redefined water from the realm of engineers to the world of social justice, sustainability, human rights, and integrated thinking

    And there was silly old me thinking it was H2O.

    And he has the nerve to criticise a PROPER SCIENTIST?

    http://www.pacinst.org/about_us/staff_board/gleick/

    • NoMoreGore says:

      Gleick is a foo foo pseudo scientist. He’s a scientist like L Ron Hubbard is a “Scientist”. THAT is how he has “Redefined water”. “…from the realm” (of the real world) ….to the eco psycho, Neo Pinko fascist twisted “realm” of “Social Justice/Sustainability…..” Flatly because this new “realm” requires no understanding of science whatsoever. It’s a place where fraudsters “redefine” the (Real) world they apparently can’t function in…. into a nether world without right/wrong, fact or fiction. Loser Scumbag.

  16. SMS says:

    Freeman Dyson understands the premise that underpins the Scientific Principle. It only takes one data point that does not agree with the theory to destroy the theory. Professor Dyson is not wedded by income to the AGW theory and can be true to the Scientific Principle. On the other hand, Mann, Gleick, and Schmidt have their careers hanging by a thread. They know that when the truth of the falicy of AGW is known, they will be pariahs; and they will do, or say, anything to not look foolish.

  17. daveburton says:

    Dyson is 89. Peter Gleick is 56 or 57. Who do you think is more likely to still have an IQ > twice his age?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s