Malfeasance At The EPA

The EPA’s job is to prevent events like what happened in Waco yesterday.

Instead, they are working 24×7 to destroy the fossil fuel industry. Like DHS, Obama has them completely focused on mindless, destructive diversions.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Malfeasance At The EPA

  1. kbray in california says:

    When seconds count, the EPA is years away.

  2. redc1c4 says:

    color me confused.,..

    i was under the impression that industrial safety was the pervue of OSHA, not the EPA. did i miss something?

  3. MikeTheDenier says:

    Biden: ‘The President Is Already Lining Up Some Additional Executive Actions’ for Guns

  4. R. de Haan says:

    To be honest, providing building permissions for residential area’s near any hazardous plant is just as criminal as planting a bomb for a terrorist attack. Regulators and Government officials don’t think, don’t have a memory, a conscience or a soul. This is is why we can do very well without them.

    • I live about 50 miles from West. Yes. More than likely the plant was there first. It was next to the rail line because it needed the rail line to operate. The nursing home, apartment complex and school probably moved there because the land prices were lower.

  5. Mike says:

    Co2 and climate change will be blamed, no doubt a hockey stick paper being manufactured as we speak.

  6. mogur2013 says:

    I gotcha hockey stick, climate change is your white Russian. You think that I make no sense, how do you think real people think you guys make any sense. Try real science, not this bull science. Alex Jones thinks that 9/11 was a false flag operation. Really. He does. How does that fit with your intelligence? Bush is evil? Obama is evil? Clinton is evil? Eisenhower is evil? All false flag. All bullshit. Come on, really? Wake up. Science is about proving right, and disproving wrong. Yet, you take this jerk, Steve, as real science? Get a life. Get smart.

    • Chewer says:

      One size, all fits all?
      Many actually think for themselves and getting some perspectives from out of the ordinary sources can help removing blinders, whether the sources provide humor, humility or expressed opinions..
      Climate science hasn’t progressed at all in the past 15 years and is just getting to criegee intermediates. Do you understand the difference between our neighbor Mars (with a dead core) and our planet with a dynamic core and an ever changing magnetosphere, which encompasses our always changing troposphere, stratosphere, mesosphere and four layers of ionosphere? Do you think the esteemed climatologists understand the dynamics of particle and electromagnetic interactions occurring within each layer and the ultimate effects within our troposphere? Surely you must understand that people have no idea what stimulus or stimuli cause inter-glacial periods to end or begin, much less the drivers of planetary core changes and climate variations.
      Anyone who goes ape shit, spreading fear and loathing of a trace gas that supports life and attempts to spin the planet as having a nominal temperature, has something other than science on their minds…

      • mogur2013 says:

        I do have science in mind, thank you for giving me credit for that. And science has evolved for many years, in spite of people thinking ‘for themselves’. I do not think that I am going ‘ape shit’, nor spreading fear and loathing. You, however, seem to want people to be complacent. Like the tobacco industry wanted people to be complacent about lung cancer. Not everyone gets lung cancer. That is a fact. But you want to ignore the problem since it has not been “proven”. Well, lung cancer isn’t necessarily caused by smoking, but I think that the ‘science’ establishes that lung cancer is ‘related’ to smoking, and you are a pervayor of evil. I hope you rot in hell.

  7. mogur2013 says:

    Weigh the options. Weigh the opinions. My opinion is no better than anyone else’s. But, you have to weigh the real scientists. Please, weigh the evidence. Don’t be swayed by political bent. And I think we all know that this site is a political bent. And my opinion is politically bent. I admit that. Does Steve admit that?

    • Chewer says:

      Yikes, my mother smoked up to 70 and is doing great at 92. One size does not fit all.
      C02 is not a culprit and why do scientists of all stripes agree upon scientific theories (all of them), but the left and right disagree on the working hypothesis of AGW?
      Do you get it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s