Understanding Lefty Thinking About Child Safety

From my discussions with lefties about Sandy Hook, I have ascertained that they believe it is better to have defenseless children getting massacred while waiting for people in blue uniforms to show up with guns, than to trust educators to protect the children themselves.

Their solution is to limit magazine sizes, which might slow things down by a few seconds, and allow the sharp shooter police to arrive only seventeen minutes too late.

ScreenHunter_234 May. 14 17.14

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Understanding Lefty Thinking About Child Safety

  1. swampsniper says:

    We are talking about people who probably call an electrician when they need a new light bulb installed. Expecting them to defend themselves is just too much to ask, they just make sure their beds are high enough above the floor for huddling under.

  2. gator69 says:

    Lefties do not think, they emote.

  3. phodges says:

    This is kinda scary…

    “Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances.


  4. Mike says:

    Lefties have one thing in common they are individually weak, they don’t trust themselves and want others to protect them.

    One leftie told me he didn’t feel safe having a gun around the house, as he wouldn’t trust himself when having an argument with his wife. I was stunned, here is a man with knives and cars etc at his disposal but his perceived fear of a gun was overwhelming.

    Lefties want to outsource their individual security to others and are prepared to sacrifice their individual freedom to do so. Survival of the weak, it cannot be good for the collective gene pool.

  5. blade says:

    Their solution is to limit magazine sizes …

    Here we go …

    Upstate man arrested for having nine — not seven — bullets in magazine – Politics on the Hudson 2013-05-13

  6. Myron Mesecke says:

    They said the Newtown shooter fired 154 rounds in less than five minutes. We know he was using a semi automatic firearm, one round for each pull of the trigger and high capacity magazines. Now let’s look at the results if he had been using normal 10 round magazines.
    We will use a slow firing rate of one round per second for the 154 rounds fired. Most people can pull a trigger faster than that.
    That is 154 seconds.
    He would need 16 ten round magazines to fire those 154 rounds.
    Assume a time of 5 seconds to change out an empty magazine with a loaded one. It can be done faster than that but we will stick with five seconds.
    16 times 5 is 80 seconds.
    80 plus 154 is 234 seconds. Divide by 60. that is 3.9.
    So using normal capacity 10 round magazines you can fire the same 154 rounds in 4 minutes where the shooter using high capacity ones took less than 5 minutes.

    But facts mean little to the anti gun people.

    • gator69 says:

      I can achieve the same rate of fire with my 12 ga shotgun. A trained shooter can also do this with a revolver and speed loads.

      McVeigh did much more damage, with a rental van and some fertilizer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s