Obama Plans to Make Statement on IRS Scandal
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
daveburton on Gallup Poll Shows That Very Fe… daveburton on Will Yale Censor My Comme… daveburton on Gallup Poll Shows That Very Fe… John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved!
Real Science 
He can announce he’s not a crook all he likes but the sane half of America ain’t buying it.
Announced the resignation of someone who was already slated to leave next month anyway. Big fat zero.
Maybe he should announce that he isn’t a flute player, either. Reggie could vouch for him… and carry his breath mints. 🙂
😉 😉
The Dolt who just keeps on giving….
Hopefully, I added this correctly….
okay, maybe not… Here’s the link…
http://landing.newsinc.com/shared/video.html?freewheel=91074&sitesection=breitbartprivate&VID=24822575
http://washingtonexaminer.com/tim-carney-the-irs-is-deeply-political-and-very-democratic/article/2529758?custom_click=rss
“In the past three election cycles, the Center for Responsive Politics’ database shows about $474,000 in political donations by individuals listing “IRS” or “Internal Revenue Service” as their employer.
This money heavily favors Democrats: $247,000 to $145,000, with the rest going to political action committees. (Oddly, half of those GOP donations come from only two IRS employees, one in Houston and one in Annandale, Va.)
IRS employees also gave $67,000 to the PAC of the National Treasury Employees Union, which in turn gave more than 96 percent of its contributions to Democrats. Add the PAC cash to the individual donations and IRS employees favor Democrats 2-to-1.
The Cincinnati office where the political targeting took place is much more partisan, judging by FEC filings. More than 75 percent of the campaign contributions from that office in the past three elections went to Democrats. In 2012, every donation traceable to employees at that office went to either President Obama or liberal Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio.”
Saw this headline on Drudge, and thought they were referring to Holder…
“Dem Rep Brings Crying Baby to Hearing…”
How do such uninformed people get into such positions of power…
http://www.buzzfeed.com/dorsey/eric-holder-just-doesnt-know
White House releases email, but three days worth are missing…
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/15/white-house-releases-benghazi-emails-see-them-here/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/16/obama-to-meet-with-treasury-officials-over-irs-scandal/
Anyone see Obama deflect a question from the Bloomberg reporter today at the press conference with PM Erdogan?
Obama was asked if anyone at the White House knew about the targeting of conservative groups before the White House Counsel was informed just a few days ago.
Obama answered, “I certainly did not know anything about the IG report before the IG report was leaked to the press,” without addressing the actual question of whether any of his political appointees in the White House were aware that the IRS was playing political favorites. All he said was that he personally did not know about the IG report. This leaves open the possibility that others in the White House knew or directed the IRS to target conservative groups, and that he knew about the activity before the IG report came out.
He could not say that no one in the White House knew, because he would be caught later in a lie. Is this Clintonian, or Nixonian?