Second Amendment Revoked In DC

the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

Not so in DC

A D.C. Superior Court judge has ordered a veteran and activist accused of openly carrying a shotgun in D.C.’s Freedom Plaza held without bond.

Activist Adam Kokesh ordered held without bond in D.C. –

Unless you work for the Obama propaganda machine

Having carefully reviewed all of the facts and circumstances of this matter, as it does in every case involving firearms-related offenses or any other potential violation of D.C. law within our criminal jurisdiction, OAG has determined to exercise its prosecutorial discretion to decline to bring criminal charges against Mr. Gregory

David Gregory Prosecution Over Gun Magazine Not Happening, D.C. Attorney Says

In Obama’s world, protection of the law only applies to his political cronies.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Second Amendment Revoked In DC

  1. Shazaam says:

    I seem to recall that since DC is a federal territory, the protections against government over-reach contained within the Bill of Rights do not apply. One of the big reason DC want’s state-hood.

    I could be wrong, I never took the time to verify that one.

    • Blade says:

      I don’t recall the Constitution granting the federal government the power to suspend the Constitution except for cases of invasion and insurrection ( which Lincoln infamously and unfortunately used ).

      It is an interesting question though because it was fully explored during the run-up to the Civil War as new territories came into the United States and each an every time the potential for new slavery became an issue.

      This is a job for Constitutional scholars certainly but I doubt that George Washington would have surveyed the District and laid the cornerstone for the Capitol if he knew this area was to be extra-Constitutional.

  2. Jeffk says:

    DC residents are 90% Dems. In other words, they won’t question their lack of personal safety because they’ve been brainwashed like Stepford wives.

  3. Robertv says:

    the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

    An Illinois sheriff’s team is crisscrossing the Chicago suburbs in an effort to seize guns from thousands of people whose right to own a firearm has been revoked, the Chicago Sun-Times reports.

    According to the paper, more than 3,000 people in Cook County have failed to surrender their revoked Firearm Owners Identification Card, or FOID, which is required to legally buy guns or ammunition.

    A Firearm Owners Identification Card is issued by the State. A right can’t be issued by the State. So in Illinois it is a privilege to keep and bear arms . This is unconstitutional. I suppose the sheriff has sworn to uphold the constitution .

    A blind person can have a FOID ?

    • Richard T. Fowler says:

      Perhaps in the near future people will require another FoID card — Freedom of Information Distribution — in order to freely exercise their right of speech. RTF

  4. John M says:

    All too common. During the same news cycle an aide to Rep John Conyers (D-MI) was caught carrying a concealed gun into a federal court building in Detroit. She received a ticket, no fine, and the incident will be expunged from her record with good behavior. Presumably that “good behavior” is continued support for gun control, just like her boss.

  5. gator69 says:

    If you want late night waffles, don’t get them in DC, Fulton county Georgia would be a safer bet…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s