Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved! Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Sir Charles on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… Ed Darrell on Phil Jones Removing The 1940…
McKibben Math : Five Is Greater Than 1,200
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/against-100-year-flood.html
And why would Bill McKibben even think to include human deaths in his thought processes? Isn’t it enough that perhaps. maybe, conceivably, some poley bear in a zoo somewhere in Colorado was inconvenienced? Isn’t that possibility more important than mere human life?
It was very windy at my place last night and one of my pieces of garden furniture blew over. I classify this as a twice in a year event. However, it shifted and blew over in such a way that it knocked over a large pot plant. Considering the original distance from the garden furniture to the pot plant I’d probably classify this as a 1 in 100 year event. Possibly if I email Bill he could sexy it up and attribute it to extreme weather.
you’ve got to consider the age of your house…how long that area has been developed, etc
I say at least a 1/10,000
The keep pushing their narrative.
How about “They” ….
McKibben sure is a frequent twatter.
Everyone knows gun owners fired in the air and punctured the clouds, which caused the flooding.
The twittering twits tweeted and once twits tweet they move on to tweet again, and again, and again,…
Nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a twit,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it
🙂
I’m sure he would notice the difference if his funding were as greatly reduced.
So what’s the “POWERFUL” link? I bet it comes with “multiple lines of evidence” and is very “robust”.
97% is a magic number. So apparently is 5.