Settled Science Update

Experts predicted a huge solar cycle.

ScreenHunter_726 Sep. 19 08.18

2013 IPS – Solar Conditions – Monthly Sunspot Numbers

2009 IPS – Solar Conditions – Monthly Sunspot Numbers

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Settled Science Update

  1. Glacierman says:

    So? CO2 controls Earth’s Temperature. Just ask Gavin.

  2. Fred from Canuckistan says:

    Big decline in sunspots?
    Decline! Again!
    No worries, they are experts in hiding declines. Hell, they’re so good, they disappeared the entire MWP! Now that takes Mannpower.

  3. Billy Liar says:

    Some experts (yes you NASA) predicted a huge cycle. Others may have been closer to the mark:

    Click to access Cycle%2024%20Smallest%20100%20years.pdf

  4. Jimmy Haigh. says:

    Around the world, warm-mongers are praying that the Sun heats up. (Even although it “has nothing to do with the climate”…)

  5. tom0mason says:

    It’s all Bush’s fault!

  6. Jason Calley says:

    Well, NASA may have made a slight typo on their 2009 prediction — uh, projection — uh, “scenario” — but their 2013 forecast is correct without a doubt. Notice that they already have proven themselves spot on with the 2000 to 2012 portion!

    🙂

  7. John B., M.D. says:

    Looks like they underestimated the unemployment rate and overestimated the sunspot counts.

  8. BobW in NC says:

    …and from the Times of India: “Solar Activity drops to 100-year low, puzzling scientists”

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Solar-activity-drops-to-100-year-low-puzzling-scientists/articleshow/22719807.cms

  9. Laz says:

    Cycle 25 is going to knock their ‘global warming’ on its rear! These people HARDLY qualify as ‘scientists’ or anything of the sort!!!

    http://www.landscheidt.info/

  10. Geoff Sharp says:

    My paper “Are Uranus & Neptune Responsible for Solar Grand Minima and Solar Cycle Modulation?” is published in the peer reviewed journal (IJAA)

    http://www.scirp.org/journal/Home.aspx?IssueID=3540#36513

    To be clear the principles in the paper are very different to what Landscheidt laid out, SC24 is exactly on track as predicted first in 2008.

  11. John says:

    In a few years NOAA will go back and revise the numbers to say what they want them to.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s