Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth And Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech, says the IPCC is taking a huge credibility hit over the hiatus – and its pronouncement that it is 95 percent certain that human activity is responsible for most global warming.
“I’m not happy with the IPCC,” she told Fox News. “I think it has torqued the science in an unfortunate direction.”
That torquing, she suggests, is because the money in climate science (the funding, that is) is tied to embellishing the IPCC narrative, especially the impacts of global warming. She is critical of the IPCC’s leadership as well, in particular its chairman, Rajendra Pachauri.
“They have explicit policy agendas,” Curry told Fox News. “Their proclamations are very alarmist and very imperative as to what we should be doing. And this does not inspire confidence in the final product.”
UN’s massive new climate report adds little explanation for ‘pause’ in warming | Fox News
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
Real Science 
This is Judy’s take home…and what puts the nail in it
If you don’t know why it could be wrong….then you are absolutely not right
“They don’t challenge it and say, well, how might this be wrong?” she told Fox News. “What are all the different reasons or ways this could be wrong? And once you start looking at it that way, you come up with a lot of different answers.”
It is very easy to get a 97% consensus when you only get money to study climate change if you believe in climate change. If you say there is no problem, why would anyone give you money to study a non-problem?
97% if the customers at Dairy Queen…
..say they prefer Dairy Queen
97% of Mormons believe Joseph Smith received a new gospel but could not prove it because the solid 24 carat gold tablets floated into the sky. It’s a consensus.
Now that they have to stop the printing press Big Government Money is a thing of the past.
Reblogged this on CACA.