NASA Settled Science

During 2006, the Sun’s “Conveyor Belt” was both the slowest and fastest on record – at the same time.

2006 : record slow

http://science.nasa.gov/

2005-2010 : record fast

http://science.nasa.gov/

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to NASA Settled Science

  1. Latitude says:

    where do you find these things??…..it’s priceless!!!!!!

  2. Sundance says:

    While NASA is busy altering past data and massaging Muslim egos, real rocket scientists are leaving to actually work on rocket technology and innovation.

    http://on.aol.com/video/nonprofit-program-building-homemade-rocketship-517968056?hp=1&playlist=127155&icid=maing-grid7%7Chp-desktop%7Cdl10%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D390146

  3. geologyjim says:

    Some folks defend Hathaway as just a hard-working NASA guy who’s dealing with a really complex issue – but he’s always doing his best in search of The Truth about the Sun.

    I don’t buy it. Any scientist worth his salt would freely acknowledge past mistakes and failures, rather than covering his butt with serial press-releases. I could be wrong, but actions speak louder than words

  4. Greg Locke says:

    Not too long ago I had the temerity to criticize on WUWT Hathaway’s 2006 predictions. Leif Svalgaard jumped my case, defending Hathaway’s work as an example of a scientist learning from his mistakes. Who am I to argue with a Stanford physics prof?

    • geologyjim says:

      I think Svalgaard is over-rated as well.

      All he does is repeat “there is no correlation between solar activity and temperature” ad infinitum. But he never offers any evidence to counter the numerous parallels between rates of solar change and temperature.

      Leif is about to have his lunch handed to him in the next decade, which will be undeniably colder than the last three decades

  5. omanuel says:

    Thanks for the quotes from Dr. David Hathaway.

    I encountered Dr. Hathaway in the summer of 2002 when he said the Sun cannot be mostly iron.

    http://www.omatumr.com/upi2002.html

    That fall I traveled to the Big Bear Observatory to confront him with observations he had ignored:

    Click to access gong-2002.pdf

    I later discovered on pages 153-154 of Fred Hoyle’s autobiography [1] that Hoyle, Sir Eddington, and most astronomers believed the Sun was mostly iron until 1946, when the model of hydrogen-filled stars was adopted without discussion or debate.

    1. Home Is Where the Wind Blows (University Science Books, April 1, 1994) 441 pp: http://www.amazon.com/Home-Where-Wind-Blows-Cosmologists/dp/093570227X

    In 1995, the Galileo probe of Jupiter confirmed severe solar mass-fractionation and the Sun’s iron-rich interior. NASA hid the data until 1998, when a CSPAN new video captured images of Dr. Goldin’s belated releasing the data:

    “Oh what a tangled web we weave
    when first we practice to deceive”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s