We Have A Winner!

Bill Goodman accuses me of doctoring a 1975 National Academy Of Sciences graph.

ScreenHunter_1682 Oct. 20 09.05

October 20, 2013 at 11:58 am


I’m guessing that Bill voted for Obama – twice.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to We Have A Winner!

  1. Bdaman says:

    Link goes to Page Not Found

  2. Kepler says:

    His second post is even more stupid than the first.

  3. Stewart Pid says:

    Bill isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to reading comprehension 😉 … or perhaps he works in climate science where they just make up missing and/or future data as required!!

  4. Cowpoke says:

    Well, from Bill’s perspective, one that has modern day charlatan scientist (and politicians) “Projecting” doom and gloom out into the distant future with charts that “Hockey Stick” into a cataclysmic end of days if we don’t change the world NOW.

    I see where he struggles with the fact that in years past where the scientist and meteorologist were actually honest truth telling folks who just did their jobs instead of distorting truth for a politically money scamming ginned up LIE’s.

    I can see why he is confused, his reality is distored.
    Poor Chap or rather poor Chump.

  5. Bill Goodman says:

    But why would you post a graph from 1975 when there are graphs that are from 2013?

    You CHOSE to post a graph that lacked important available data. Get it?

    Why did you chose a graph incomplete in an important way?

    Perhaps next you can “prove” Israel does not exist by posting a map from 1946.

    • Bill, you are digging yourself deeper and deeper into a hole.

      Do you believe that the past changes over time? Do you believe that it is OK for NASA to alter pre-1975 temperature records? Perhaps your real name is Winston Smith?

    • Traitor In Chief says:

      Apparently, even with a chance here to redeem yourself, you have failed. Better to be silent, and have others believe you may be remedial, than to comment, and remove all doubt.

    • Robert Austin says:

      Bill Goodman,
      The 1975 NAS graph is important history and shows the fallacy of extrapolation of short trends. In those days the 30 years of cooling led the chicken littles to worry about an impending return of a little ice age or even the plunge into a full blown ice age. Similarly, the thirty years of warming following scared the bejesus out of those with blinders on for historical climate change leading to the forecast of catastrophic global warming. Are you too so blind as not to see the lesson?

  6. Bill Goodman says:

    “I’m guessing that Bill voted for Obama – twice.”

    I presume you are working under the assumption that everyone who went to college is a liberal.

    I voted for Obama once and McCain in 2008.

    I voted for Reagan twice.

    Ironically, people like you often had not voted for Reagan. (e.g. Limbaugh never voted for Reagan)

  7. Kepler says:

    Makes me wonder how many people visit this site each day and shake their head with disgust because they don’t have the wherewithal to understand the arguments that are presented here.

  8. BC says:

    Lil’ Bill’s head must spin at hypersonic velocity when you post the GIF’s of the “adjustments” (Read: Fraudulent tampering) of the historical temperature records perpetrated by Algore’s sockpuppet, James “I Luvz Me Sum Handcuffs!” Hansen. 😀

  9. Justa Joe says:

    Despite naming Ronald Reagan as his greatest influence, Limbaugh never actually voted for him because he didn’t register to vote until he [Limbaugh] was 35. He probably never voted for Ike either.

    We have a AGW lovin’ regurgitator of libtard talking points that luvs him some Ronnie… yeah riiight. A guy claims to be proud to have voted for Reagan, but then states that he voted for B. Hussein for his second term. We have one mixed up fellow.

    • _Jim says:

      Limbaugh never actually voted for him because he didn’t register to vote until he [Limbaugh] was 35.

      Where did you get this anyway?

      I have listened since sometime in the early 90’s .. used to tape the pgm at home and replay after work (these were the days before internet) … don’t ever recall this being discussed …

  10. egorone says:

    Dr Don Easterbrooke has shown original temp data sets that shows the high priests of doom have been manipulating temp data sets to further their religious beliefs!!!
    And this was shown in front of a U.S.senate Hearing !!
    Enjoy >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s