Something For Nothing

Obama sold Obamacare to a bunch of empty-headed Democrats by convincing them that increasing the demand for healthcare and introducing middlemen, would lower the costs.

ScreenHunter_1923 Oct. 27 14.02

Why is a raven like a writing desk?

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Something For Nothing

  1. Okie says:

    Democrats have been craving nationalized healthcare ever since FDR released his ‘Second Bill of Rights.” They need no justification other than to deny us our liberty.

  2. Kent Clizbe says:

    But, Steve, you’re missing the key point:

    The middlemen would be Politically Correct Progressive government workers.

    And they __care___ more than you.

    So it will all be okay. Okay?

    Don’t get it? Racist!

  3. diogenes100 says:

    Obama, Reid, and Pelosi sold ObamaCare as a means of creating even more dependency on Government – thus ensuring the supremacy of the Democratic Party in perpetuity. This has been the ultimate goal of all ambitious Democrat politicians since FDR. This common goal of all leftist parties was the background of George Orwell’s writing.

  4. mkelly says:

    Why is a raven like a writing desk?

    I give.

  5. Don says:

    Also demonizing the health insurance companies. Yet at that time a poll showed 85% of Americans satisfied with their health care. So wreck the system for 15%, typical left nonsense. Ruin it for the vast majority.

    • Andy Oz says:

      Mad Hatter logic of the alarmists.
      Any place that is hot is experiencing Globull Warming.
      Any place that is cold is experiencing weather.
      So Eastern Australia has some bushfires and its CAGW but Western Australia has cold Spring temps and its weather.
      Peru has ice cold temps and its weather, while the Alaska has a couple of days of warm temps and its CAGW.
      And they wonder why skeptics reckon alarmists are effing liars.

  6. Bill Illis says:

    When you get up to 50% of the population receiving a net benefit from governments (subsidies or welfare, whatever), then it becomes nearly impossible for a right-wing, cut-spending party to win an election.

    This is what the Scandinavian nations found themselves in decades ago and many other countries have faced since. All that results is never-ending deficits and more government borrowing to fund ever more programs (unless you are Norway with so much oil revenue).

    Government needs to stay below 40% of GDP because even a moderate recession then puts you into that make-or-break 50% category that you can’t get out of.

    Now if you are a left-leaning party, this is what you want, no matter how bad or how counter-productive each individual program is. No matter if the country goes into recession. Just getting the “depend on government” or the “get a net benefit of government crowd” proportion up to 50% guarantees re-election.

    Obama won the last one based on this demographic change alone. It was a done deal.

    40% of GDP or less is the proper number to ensure efficient government. You might think even 40% is a high number but that is more-or-less what government is today. There are some 25%’s and some 30%’s, but almost all are 40% to 53% today. Highways are expensive, welfare is expensive, taxes are high, left-leaning parties need to get re-elected.

  7. Chewer says:

    Something for nothing and shits for free!

  8. R. de Haan says:

    Obamacare is part of a continuing break down of the USA:

    Former Congressional staffer Susan Lindauer covered Iraq and Libya at UN as a U.S. Intelligence Asset and back door channel on anti-terrorism from 1993-2003.

    Summer of 2001, her team warned about a major terrorist attack involving airplane hijackings and a strike on the World Trade Center.

    Listen to what Susan Lindauer had to say, just skip the introduction:

  9. I believe one of Obama’s objectives was to even out the playing field so that no single individual would be hit with astronomical health costs? Wasn’t this the situation with his mother? But there is no such thing as a free lunch. Health costs would have to go up for modest users such as younger people, in order to protect the high usage individuals.

    • Obama’s mother had insurance for the cancer. She also had a highly-paid son in Chicago, a big ticket attorney making $150k a year at the time — who refused to even go see her because she was white. (He was holed up with Jeremiah Wright at the time, and admits in his book that he considers this a mistake,)

      ===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

  10. Eric Simpson says:

    Reagan’s Liberal Daughter: Why Am I Losing My Health Insurance?

    Former President Ronald Reagan’s liberal activist daughter Patti Davis is asking just what many other people across the United States want to know — why she’s losing her insurance via twitter: “Could the president please explain why I and others are losing our health ins. plans? Wasn’t supposed to happen!”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s