100 Years Of Stupid Global Warming Predictions

It has been 100 years since the father of global warming made predictions equally  as stupid as the ones being made now by James Hansen.

Jan 28, 1913

Siberia will become the greatest farming country in the world.


The Pueblo Leader – Google News Archive Search


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to 100 Years Of Stupid Global Warming Predictions

  1. omanuel says:

    George Orwell had it figured out with the term , “Doublespeak”, that he introduced in “Nineteen Eighty-Four”


    Today well known waste products of combustion and stars, like CO2 and H, are disguised as fuel, and the people are confused.

  2. NikFromNYC says:

    “A great many kinds of plants that are necessary for human life will simply die out. There will be more sickness, both for man and beast; harvests will grow smaller, and the quality of food will deteriorate. The carbon dioxide in the air will absorb and hold fast the warmth given out by the earth. This will cause the climate to become milder and the Polar ice will begin to thaw. As a result, there will be a rise in the level of the ocean and whole continents will be flooded.” – Nazi party eugenicist Gunther Schwab in his book, Dance With The Devil, 1958

  3. phodges says:

    Truly stunning:


     Northdevonjournal.co.uk “Met Office spokesman Nicky Maxey was critical of the reports, saying those producing them were “gazing into their crystal ball”.  “The science simply doesn’t exist to accurately predict so far in advance. Weather is too unpredictable”

  4. But he was one of the world’s greatest scientists… ! 🙂

  5. Andy Oz says:

    The latest moronic gumpf from the media corpse –
    Shock news: CAGW will boost EL NINO!! – AUSTRALIA DOOMED!!!
    Since Australia has had Europeans here only for 230 years, and the first SH weather station was built in Tasmania in 1840, did the aborigines take the Pacific sea temperature records for the previous 430 years?

    “Australia may face more intense and frequent bouts of extreme weather in the future as global warming “energises” the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the dominant climate system over the Pacific, according to an Australian-led team of researchers.

    The research, led by Shayne McGregor at the University of NSW’s Climate Change Research Centre, found that the ENSO phenomena were more active and intense during the 1979-2009 period that at any time in the past 600 years.”

    • Andy Oz says:

      Arrhenius must have been Lenin’s paranormal go to guy just like Hansen has been Obama’s paranormal go to guy.
      Wind farm collectives across the US….
      Wheat farms collectives across Siberia

  6. And thats why Hansen no longer works for NASA as they go back to being a scientific body.

  7. TomC says:

    At least Arrhenius was optimistic about the future prospects of farming. Today’s crop of CO2 worshipers believe perhaps only small pockets of Antarctica might possibly be habitable for life, maybe.

  8. Rosco says:

    Arrhenius credibility must be doubted due to his continued belief in the “aether” theory.

    Also he must be considered insane because he actually thought some global warming would be beneficial to mankind.

    Modern climate science is much more robust – LOL !

  9. Climate change in 1855.

    He even uses the phrase “climate change”

  10. Bob Young says:

    At least he also mentioned some positives. Now all they say is everyone will die. At least the alarmists from 100 yrs ago were optimistic.

  11. Jim Macdonald says:

    In his laboratory he assumed that IR radiation was unlimited. However it is limited by the amount of direction radiation from the sun. As CO2 increases it depletes the amount of IR available in the two narrow absorption bands. By the time the concentration of CO2 reaches 400 ppm, most all the IR has been depleted and little further warming can occur.

  12. Mohunch says:

    After the 2005 hurricane season the Gullible Warming cult members were telling us that 2005 was going to be the new norm for hurricane season.

    As of November 3, 2013, it has been 2,932 days since the U.S. was struck by a major hurricane.

  13. Steve, your research on these earlier reports is brilliant and they speak for themselves in showing up this climate nonsense for what it is.

    Of course, Greenland did have a good climate for farming in the MWP, until it got colder again.

    “Climate gets warmer, climate gets colder, climate gets warmer, climate gets colder, duh.”
    (Homer Simpson, unattributed)

  14. Edmonton Al says:

    If CO2 is a gas, and it gets warmer from IR, it should expand and rise. No?
    The expanded volume of CO2 can hold more heat but the temperature doesn’t go up. Right?
    Just askin”…….

  15. Maryann Cassidy says:

    I think the appropriate term for Hansen is CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMIST, not GLOBAL WARMING ALARMIST:
    not James Hansen, NASA’s master alarmist who is very prominent in promoting the current global warming scare, is referenced in a 1971 Washington post article claiming global cooling to be likely: “The world could be as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age, a leading atmospheric scientist predicts. Dr. S. I. Rasool … a colleague of Mr. Hansen’s at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The article goes on to say that Mr. Rasool came to his chilling conclusions by resorting in part to a new computer program developed by Mr. Hansen that studied clouds above Venus.” [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/09/19/nasa-scientists-predicted-new-ice-age-1971]

    It was referring to a 1971 article in Science: Rasool and Schneider: “Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate” [http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/173/3992/138], which states: “although the addition of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does increase the surface temperature, the rate of temperature increase diminishes with increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. For aerosols, however, the net effect of increase in density is to reduce the surface temperature of Earth. Because of the exponential dependence of the backscattering, the rate of temperature decrease is augmented with increasing aerosol content. … If sustained over a period of several years, such a temperature decrease over the whole globe is believed to be sufficient to trigger an ice age.” (Coauthor Stephen Schneider is now one of the most prominent global warming alarmists.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s