The Game Is Over – Referee Blew The Whistle – Now They Want To Change The Rules

ScreenHunter_1937 Nov. 02 07.11


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to The Game Is Over – Referee Blew The Whistle – Now They Want To Change The Rules

  1. omanuel says:

    No, this game is without end. Buts common theme is emerging in the scientific community and the press:

    How did George Orwell figure out serfdom was our fate in 1946 when he started writing the futuristic novel, “Nineteen Eighty-Four”?

    The first scientist to visit Hiroshima’s ruins in August 1945, Professor P. K. Kuroda, designed a research project to reveal the answer in 1960.

    See: “A Journey to the Core of the Sun” (in progress).

    1. A one page synopsis:

    Click to access Synopsis.pdf

    2. Chapter 1: The first scientist to visit Hiroshima’s ruins in August 1945, Professor P. K. Kuroda

    Click to access Chapter_1.pdf

    Today I will start writing Chapter 2, knowing without doubt there is more validity in the conflicting opinions of a dozen skeptical scientists than in the consensus opinions of thousands of text-book authors, well-funded and tenured professors and Nobel Prize winners.

    With kind regards,
    Oliver K. Manuel
    Former NASA Principal
    Investigator for Apollo

    Sent from my iPhone

  2. Jimmy Haigh says:

    I always like the “before we get worried” phrase. They’re not worried about global warming: they’re worried about global non-warming.

  3. R. Shearer says:

    They get worried because something they say is bad isn’t happening?

  4. mkelly says:

    Talk about cherry picking.

  5. Climatism says:

    Reblogged this on CACA and commented:
    “Before we get worried” … about our government grants evaporating.

  6. Aurora Svant says:

    So, this is a clear statement, that they expect to keep on riding the gravy train of grants until (“2004/5” + 15) = 2019/20.
    They are therefore clearly not “worried” yet, and will feel secure for 5 more years.

    Question is, can the economy recover after 5 more years of such a stupendous waste ?

  7. TomC says:

    Also from the email thread:

    “There is an issue with all the buoy data (drifters) entering SST analyses since about
    First there seem to be offsets of 0.1 to 0.2 deg C between these drifters and
    conventional ships (drifters cooler). Drifters now dominating , providing about 80%
    of the obs.”

    It would appear the “drifters” (likely the ARGO buoys) are cooler than conventional ships and they represent 80% of the data now. This is an issue – err – a problem. And if you look at ocean heat content from the ARGO data in 2009 it was a flat trend, maybe even down a bit. I guess they solved that problem because ARGO apparently found the heat at the bottom of the ocean in 2010 and suddenly all the ocean heat content *published data post-2010 showed a spike in ocean heat content since the deployment of the ARGO buoys. So ocean heat is apparently spiking faster than ever measured before and the ocean has a heat storage capacity many MANY times greater than the atmosphere which must mean the atmosphere must be raging hot to warm the oceans in such vast ways from a rapidly intensifying heat source. Yet the smartest people in the world, the climate scientists, tell us this heat is somehow bypassing the atmosphere, which refuses to warm any further from this heat source despite its much faster reaction/lower thermal inertia to changes in heat, and goes directly into the oceans. And not only is all this heat going into the oceans, we cannot even measure it in the traditional sense. Somehow the greatest amount of heat ever added to the oceans in such a short period of time is amazingly immeasurable using traditional methods of gathering sea temperature. We need diving buoys to measure the heat at the bottom of the ocean and never mind that we have no prior set of global data for reliable comparison to form any conclusion off a 9-year old data set. Also, never mind the gatekeepers to this data are neck-deep in global warming promotion. This must be how the cooler drifters ended up being the data which, as a total content of heat measured, shows the greatest amount of warming. How a observation method which shows admittedly cooler data than the prior method of gathering data yet shows a warming trend above and beyond any prior method of data gathering is something which could only be a product of government or propaganda. Either way, these people who promote this global warming agenda have ruined an entire century-and-a-half’s worth of global observation and have corrupted the field of Earth Studies into religious affinity for carbon dioxide.

  8. Lawrie Ayres says:

    These so called scientists must by now know they have been wrong and yet they continue to “prove” themselves right by doctoring data. Surely that is a criminal offence since most of that data is the property of the taxpayer. There is every reason to believe that those scientists who doctored data should be charged and when found guilty sent to jail. Maybe that is why they are concerned and why they are fighting so hard. Hansen bailed out and will be forgotten but the Phil Joneses of this world will spend quiet time in a secluded place.

    • omanuel says:


      These “scientists” are pawns in a desperate attempt to hide sixty-eight (2013 – 1945 = 68 yrs) years of mostly successful deception about:

      1. The supposed integrity of national governments, and
      2. The energy stored in cores of heavy atoms and stars.

      Henry Kissinger may be the only politician still alive who remembers that FEAR of nuclear annihilation is why these 1945 decisions were made.

      “Acceptance of Reality” will be the title to Chapter 2 of an ongoing autobiography, A Journey to the Core of the Sun.

      It will begin with this quote from Maria Skłodowska-Curie:

      “Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood.
      Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less.”

      A Hungarian astronomer, Peter Toth, published the truth about Earth’s heat source in 1977 [1] and vanished. Samples from the 1969 Apollo Mission to the Moon [2] and the 1995 Galileo probe of Jupiter revealed the truth about the Sun [3]. NASA hid the Jupiter data. Nature refused to send 2012 confirmation [4] of the Sun’s pulsar core out for review.

      This CSPAN news video [5] shows Dr. Dan Goldin, the NASA Administrator, belatedly releasing the 1995 Jupiter data in 1998.

      1. Peter Toth, “Is the Sun a pulsar?” Nature 270, 159-160 (1977).

      2. O. K. Manuel and Golden Hwaung, “Solar abundances of the elements”,
      Meteoritics 18, 209-222 (1983):

      3. O. Manuel, “Isotopic ratios in Jupiter confirm intra-solar diffusion”,
      Meteoritics and Planetary Science 33, A97, paper 5011 (1998):

      Click to access 5011.pdf

      4. Oliver K. Manuel and Alberto Boretti, “Yes, the Sun is a pulsar,” Nature (submitted 12 Dec 2012)

      5. CSPAN news video (7 Jan 1998) shows NASA releasing 1995 Jupiter data

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s