Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
-
Join 1,966 other followers
Recent Comments
daveburton on Gallup Poll Shows That Very Fe… daveburton on Will Yale Censor My Comme… daveburton on Gallup Poll Shows That Very Fe… John on The Price Of Telling The Truth… Don Gaddes on Seven Year Drought Killed 40%… Bill Sokeland on NSIDC : Arctic Was Ice Free In… Notes To Ponder on 45 Years Since Paul Ehrlich Wa… gator69 on A Proof That Greenhouse Gas Dr… gator69 on Toto Has Moved! Menicholas on Toto Has Moved!
Gleick’s Institute Admits That There Has Been No Sea Level Rise On The West Coast
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
What is the time frame for short and long term? These people are crazy.
Do we know if this Gleick himself or a minion?
And as for the short/term long term bit, who’s been shouting about a supposed acceleration in SLR since 1993.
Proper scientists tell you that such things should be looked at over 60 cycles or more.
LOL! That last tweet cracks me up! Ha!
Funny, but really there is no vertical motion on a strike slip fault. More fittingly it would be a dip-slip fault.
Typical of fear mongering at the Los Angeles Times’s (Jan 2011):
When I contacted the staff writer, he responded with:
There ya go — how our national media sources science – the NYT’s. LOL
“DPO Phases” dumb people overcome
Maybe he needs some education on PDO phase. Pacific Decadal Oscillation
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_decadal_oscillation
DPO is actually is a phase when a woman ovulates..lol
http://community.babycenter.com/post/a15678045/counting_your_dpo_luteal_phase
One has to admit it’s tempting to focus on imaginary problems than real problems in the world, as imaginary problems are usually easier to fix.
The bad thing about fixing imaginary problems is that you never know when you are successful. Fixing imaginary problems would keep you employed for a indeterminate time!
Wait a minute…
“Rising sea levels threaten US ports”.
Call Homeland Security. Those dip slips will be able to arrest them.
Must be a case of voluntary dyslexia . . as you got your h’s and t’s mixed up with l’s and p’s.
These people need to start signing legal documents that state if their predictions fail to come true on such and such a date then they forfeit all their assets and they lose their present jobs. if they are deceased then their heirs will lose everything they inherited from their lying parent.
Force them by law to have some serious skin in the game. I’ll bet the fearmongering will stop immediately.
Sea level in San Francisco is falling about 0.06 mms/year since 1980 (although it is rising at 1.4 mms/year since 1854).
GPS receivers indicate San Francisco is subsiding at 1.12 mms/year.
Actual sea level change then: between +0.29 mms/year to -1.18 mms/year [far off the +3.2 mms/year from the sea level satellites].
Maybe Gleick is in the wrong institute.
Scientists Find That Sea Level Rise Is Much Slower Than Expected…No Human Fingerprint – See more at: http://notrickszone.com/#sthash.WYSNZe1E.dpuf and http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2013/04/25/rate-of-sea-level-rise-is-controlled-by-natural-oscillations/ and many other newer papers casting Gleick contentions into doubt.