Can Low Solar Activity Overcome Massive Government Data Tampering?

ScreenHunter_309 Nov. 14 09.38

Michael E. Mann (MichaelEMann) on Twitter


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Can Low Solar Activity Overcome Massive Government Data Tampering?

  1. omanuel says:

    No. Sixty-eight years (2013 – 1945 = 68 yrs) of government deception is coming to an end.

    Chapter 2 of my autobiography will present clear and unequivocal evidence nuclear, solar and space sciences were compromised to hide the source of energy that causes cores of heavy atoms, some planets, stars and galaxies to fission and/ or emit neutrons that spontaneously decay to hydrogen (H) atoms: NEUTRON REPULSION !

    Oliver K. Manuel
    Former NASA Principal
    Investigator for Apollo

    • Sparks says:

      So, do you think that there is a neutron star or something similar at the suns core? In principle, that would explain some unusual data I’m looking at regarding solar activity.

  2. pinroot says:

    So did Mann just refer to “deniers” as “climate change critics”? Is this the beginning of the back-peddle for Mann?

    • omanuel says:

      There is absolutely no doubt the core of the Sun is the remnant pulsar from the birth of the solar system five billion years (5 Ga) ago.

      Here is one of the observations ignored since 1975, although it was confirmed by analysis of other meteorites and by the Galileo probe of Jupiter in 1995:

      It is not explained by:

      1. Super-heavy element fission
      2. Interstellar dust grains
      3. A nearby SN injection

      • Sparks says:

        Hypothetically, if the sun was formed from the core of a supernova, then this core must have consumed a lot of interstellar matter, nebula? it would also mean that the Orion arm that the sun is part of, was ejected from the milky-way during an earlier stage of the milky ways formation, this actually has huge implications on galaxy formation, When I was studying galaxy formation about 15 years ago I wasn’t happy with the explanation of galaxies forming under their own weight from gasses that had an unknown source and some nonsense about a singularity and finite multiple-universes popping in and out of existence, aka “the big bang”, to this day I leave it alone, but, I will say, at the time, I did realize that if you took the entire mass of the milky-way or any large galaxy it will form a ‘super massive black hole’ an enormous amount of energy stored in one place, I also worked out that if you brought two or more of these ‘super massive black hole’ together they would destroy each other and begin to release their energy forming galactic structures, first in the form of exotic particles (similar to those found in the so-called universe) gases and stars, the release of energy from these types of black-hole interactions would produce a signature similar to the background microwave radiation attributed to the ‘big bang theory’, when I went looking for proof of this I found out that Hubble himself noted; that all galaxies are either traveling towards each other or apart from each other, the theory that the universe is expanding was also derived from fact because, statistically there are more galaxies traveling away from each other than moving toward each other. The obvious solution to me is that galaxies that are traveling towards each other (just like the milky-way and the Andromeda galaxy) are newly forming galaxies, and those that are traveling away from each other are mature galaxies that have formed and are much older.

  3. @NJSnowFan says:

    Sunspot activity controls Arctic temps, end of 2012 to present Sunspot activity and Arctic temps above 80 N

  4. Mike the Pilt says global temps need to go below 160-year lows (in other words, return to Little Ice Age temps), and they have to do so within the “next few years,” before he admits that he’s been lying? I don’t think so. He will never admit he lied.

    This fool is the enemy of science, enemy of the economy, the enemy of mankind. He needs to be silenced.

  5. phodges says:

    Those are legitimate empirical adjustments.


  6. Gone from Hudson’s twitter feed.

  7. Andy DC says:

    If I wanted to prove global cooling, just let me determine where every station is sited. Near no buildings, gravel, concrete or asphalt. In a nice low pocket to get maximum radiation at night. Well shaded with lots of trees. That would instantly created about 5 degrees of immediate cooling at places like Reagan National Airport.

    The fact of the matter is that agenda driven NOAA people determine station siting. Also thermometer caibration. How else do you account for my car thermometer reading 5 degrees colder than Reagan National when I am less than two miles away and close to the Potomac?
    I have had the same car for 8 years and it was not that way at all for quite a few years. Something is rottten and it is not in Denmark!!

    Reagan National’s weather records are a total fiction and not at all representative of the DC area.

    • gator69 says:

      Animated timeline of the fraud…

    • Ernest Bush says:

      I live in Yuma, AZ, which has the largest runway system in the Southwest. In the 50’s it was a SAC B-52 base. It’s temperature gauge is in the middle of that system. I live in a valley surrounded by trees and grass several miles away. I’ve seen variances between my house and that airport of 8 to 9 degrees in the morning. It’s all about micro-climate.

  8. watcher says: Read this as Green Energy Heats the world. How many Billions of BTU”S are necessary to burn the wings off of over flying birds.. The power plant it is to replace never got near that GREAT ENVIRAMENTAL Accomplishment.. Not to mention all the Birds ENDANGERED spices they are Killing with Windmills.
    But it’s Ok they mean well. Bird lovers only when it helps Liberals. Or loose their Government handouts.

  9. Tel says:

    Even just a stable Earth temp proves the alarmists wrong, and the longer it stays stable the less affraid everyone is.

    Depends how long the low solar activity goes on for, they can fudge global averages, but they can’t fudge cold winters, expensive fuel and electricity, heavy snowfalls, fewer hurricanes, arctic ice, etc. If the sun is cooperative a bit longer I’d expect all those glaciers to start growing.

    The sad thing is that cold winters kill people, but at least we learn something.

  10. ^^ The hockey stick explained

  11. ntesdorf says:

    Adjusting (falsifying) temperatures by 2 degrees should stretch credibility limits of anyone but a moron beyond their snapping limit. Is Mann sensing a Climate Shift?

  12. Reblogged this on Power To The People and commented:
    President Obama’s policies are founded on lies. Lies that justify using the force of government to destroy America’s coal industry and replace it with bird killing, inefficient and high price renewable energy that can provide only a fraction of the energy fossil fuel does.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s