Climate Sensitivity Throughout The Satellite Era

Temperatures have been flat to down since 360 PPM CO2, but through the entire satellite record, the worst case that could be made is 0.3ºC warming per 100 PPM CO2 .

ScreenHunter_83 Nov. 16 11.04


Antarctic temperatures show no correlation with CO2, and Arctic temperatures show less than 1ºC per 100 PPM CO2.

ScreenHunter_84 Nov. 16 11.12

ScreenHunter_85 Nov. 16 11.14

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Climate Sensitivity Throughout The Satellite Era

  1. tom0mason says:

    We drove all those SUVs for decades, and nothing.
    Future generations are going to think us so dumb-ass stupid for not continuing to drive them.

  2. Aurora Svant says:

    There is an obvious biais in temperature records. There cannot be both a positive trend in one hemisphere, and a zero trend in the other, with the same CO2 measurement.

    Rather than looking at CO2, which these graphs show has no impact whatsoever, temperature data collection and post-processing methods should be scrutinized. At best there are flaws to be fixed, but more probably, in view of the political biais of the issue by “climatologists”, there is fraud involved.

    • Andy Oz says:

      Of course there can be a temperature increase in the north and nothing in the south. Because temperature delta has nothing to do with CO2 and everything to do with the amount of industrial activity and urbanisation – minimal in the south and just enough in the north to push up a smidgen. As technology makes industrial activity more energy efficient, much less is lost to heat and thus temperatures will revert to equilibrium with UHI the only significant human induced factor on local temperatures.
      And we have more ocean in the south than the north that acts as a buffer to the stupid runaway heat scenarios. CAGW is a myth created to change tax law and direct more and more wealth away from free people and to the elite few. It’s no secret. The rest of the noise is PR.

  3. Blaze says:

    Interesting data. Arctic temperatures have no correlation with CO2 levels. It’s a compelling argument, but I guess I find it hard to believe based on just the data alone. Say a little bit more about it so we can understand more!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s