GISS Data Tampering Accounts For 100% Of US Warming

GISS used to show that the US cooled from 1930 through 1999, and that 1934 was much warmer than 1998. But they changed the graph to create the appearance of a non-existent warming trend.

http://web.archive.org/web/20120124014257/http://www.john-daly.com/usatemps.006

data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.D.txt

GISS is tampering with US temperatures at a rate of 0.6ºC per century.

GISSCHeat

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to GISS Data Tampering Accounts For 100% Of US Warming

  1. NikFromNYC says:

    I noticed a curious association of the NASA GISS entrance with Columbia Business School:
    http://postimg.org/image/tboyszfu5/

    That’s just their standard logo on the side street entrance, not ten feet from the back of Tom’s Diner. The plaque does not appear in Google Street View so is new.

    I also humorously note that Jim Hansen’s new personal web page now lists his address in a different off-campus building, namely a theology building next to church, near Riverside Park.

  2. Fred from Canuckistan says:

    They just need to keep the scam going a few more years so they can qualify for their big fat government pensions. Once they are retired the next crew can have long careers and get their pensions by fixing the tampered data.

    Good scam, they get paid either way.

  3. The Iconoclast says:

    Fraud, plain and simple.

    Keep up the good work, Steven. These charts are precious.

  4. That’s 0.6°/century / 1.3 decades = 0.46°C per century of tampering PER DECADE!

  5. Billy Liar says:

    Winston Smith works as a clerk in the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth, where his job is to rewrite historical documents so they match the constantly changing current party line.

    • tom0mason says:

      Once over his initial left-wing foolishness George Orwell (aka Eric A. Blair) understood the madness of lefty socialist mentality.
      He foolishly believed that his books were warnings about possible futures. Unfortunately the lazy leaders of today use his writings as blueprints.

  6. Bob Johnston says:

    Question – Isn’t it true that GISS gets its climate data form NOAA, who also “adjusts” the numbers as well? Would it be fair to say that there are a couple layers of tampering going on?

  7. Andy DC says:

    I never have figured out the justification for the data tampering. Has anyone ever given an understandable answer? Then station siting is so important. Just putting the thermometer in a low pocket can make it 5-10 degrees colder on a still night, not to mention exposure to sun, presence of asphalt, concrete,etc. Vegetation, trees and water as well. There is an obvious art to station siting that can easily make 3-4 degrees difference in the same general location. Since NOAA controls ths siting, they control that aspect completely and we know they have an agenda.

    • tom0mason says:

      The right-wing thermometer readers of the past were always reading temperatures too high. This was due to their erroneous optimism that deluded them into continuously thinking it was warmer than it really was.

  8. Andy DC says:

    These were low temperatures in the Washington, DC area this morning.

    National Airport 29
    Quantico 24
    Patuxent 23
    Dulles 23
    Andrews AFB 23
    BWI 22
    Fredericksburg 22
    Fort Belvoir 21

    You can see that aside from National Airport, the temperatures are very uniform, but average more than 6 degrees colder than National Airport. Yet National is the “official” station.

    It is not hard to have heat records when your station is so unrepresentative. No doubt deliberately so.

  9. ed says:

    Nice looking CO2 curve there…

  10. Andy Oz says:

    Runaway temperature tampering.
    If you like your temperature fraud you can keep your temperature fraud.

  11. Phil Jones says:

    Of course they had to alter the data… The 30’s were inconveniently Hot… As Stephen’s demonstrated repeatedly right here using Hansen’s data, IPCC Data, UHCN data.. In other words charting real Temp measurements … Not “normalizing” then pooping out a chart …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s