Posting Facts Violates Guardian’s Community Standards

ScreenHunter_392 Dec. 06 12.00

This is the comment they removed :

ScreenHunter_383 Dec. 06 09.13

06 December 2013 4:16pm

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Posting Facts Violates Guardian’s Community Standards

  1. Owen says:

    The 52% that believe global warming is primarily man made are incompetent idiots. They must have their heads buried in the sand. As for the Guardian, they never let the facts get in the way of their brainless ideology. They aren’t in the news business – they are in the propaganda business.

  2. Yeah, but 99-44/100% pure does…

    I always wondered what the other 0.56% of impurities was…

  3. Psalmon says:

    Here are some examples of real media coverage bias:

    “We know that he (S. Hussein) has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”


    “Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
    — Al Gore, Speech to Commonwealth Club, Sept. 23, 2002

    Here’s the link to the speech at George Wash Univ:

    Biggest media whitewash in history.

  4. The comment was most likely removed because the person reading it refused to believe it.

  5. Chuck says:

    The comment is actually highly offensive…. to liberals.

  6. They can’t brainwash their readers if we knock them off their soap box.

  7. Andy DC says:

    Sometimes the truth hurts far more than any lie.

  8. Andy OZ says:

    Clear evidence the the UK is sinking under the sea. Meanwhile, nothing happening in the rest of the world. Global weirding! I’m off to the beach. Ciao!

  9. Jack Savage says:

    Continue always to take a copy of any comment you post at the Guardian. You will then eventually have a lovely selection revealing the full extent of the opinions they cannot bear to see the light of day.

  10. Jimbo says:

    Dana probably remove the comment. You are lucky, I got banned earlier this week, again. 😉 I was just comparing CAGW to Lysenkoism.

  11. Lars P. says:

    Thank you for posting that.

    Shaming and naming seems to be the only way how warmistas can be brought to debate?

    What arguments can the moderator have to deny that post to appear other then censoring the truth? And they dare to point at the policies…
    It deserves printed again and again for each and every censored post…

  12. Phil Jones says:

    How dare you think against my consensus!!

    Off with his head…. Arghhhhhhhh……

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s