Climate Math : 0+0 = 2

NOAA says that the US has warmed two degrees since the 1890’s.

Yet, in 1989. they said that there was zero warming over the last century.

BcPLttCCcAAQm06

The Milwaukee Journal – Google News Archive Search

In 1999, Hansen said there was no US warming over the last 50 years.

in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

Since 1999, US temperatures have declined. So the trends are – zero from 1889 to 1999, zero from 1949 to 1999, and negative from 1999 to 2013.

Somehow this adds up to +2, in the world of climate science corruption.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Climate Math : 0+0 = 2

  1. omanuel says:

    It is obviously difficult to remember which falsehood one is suppose to endorse next.

    Candid answers to two key questions will end sixty-eight years of deceit: Why was:

    1. The internal composition of the Sun changed from mostly iron (Fe) in 1945 to mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946?

    2. Nobel Laureate Francis W. Aston’s rigorously valid “nuclear packing fraction” replaced with von Weizsacker’s convincing but deceptive “nuclear binding energy” after the Second World War?

    Click to access WHY.pdf

    Best wishes for the New Year,
    – Oliver K. Manuel
    Former NASA Principal
    Investigator for Apollo

    • Paul Clark says:

      Thanks for that link Oliver. The thermonuclear core idea is troubling. If it was truly millions of degrees, that heat would easily find its way to the surface, making the surface way hotter than 6000K.

      In my opinion the outside of the sun is the hottest and most active part, the cooler layer underneath being revealed in sunspots. Don’t know about a “pulsar core”, but it wouldn’t surprise me if the sun is mostly made of iron.

  2. Andy Oz says:

    0+0=2
    Makes sense to me but then I’ll check with professor choom just to make sure.

  3. gator69 says:

    “The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.”
    Aristotle

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s