Climate Scientist Brags About His Role In Nazi Style Book Burning

ScreenHunter_101 Jan. 20 06.39

James’ Empty Blog: Recognising a pattern

They just want to have an honest debate, which means silencing any opposing viewpoints.

h/t to @Foxgoose and Marc Morano

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Climate Scientist Brags About His Role In Nazi Style Book Burning

  1. Kent Clizbe says:

    Debate? Honest debate? Debate what?

    The science is settled, Denier. No need for debate.

    Shut up and get in line. Or we’ll shut you down too.

    (Parody of how the “Scientists'” would respond to your post.)

  2. omnologos says:

    He had to change exhibit A into exhibit C as I was wondering where the pattern was

  3. gator69 says:

    What conspiracy?

  4. Shazaam says:

    The real question is: How did he know the motives of the so-called climate skeptics (CS) ?

    In the absence of actual knowledge and facts, he can only assume. And oddly enough, when people make assumptions about the motives of others, they tend to project their own motives and methods.

    His assumptions about the motives of others is a wonderful mirror into his own.

    The thief assumes everyone else is a thief.

    • Tel says:

      When I first scanned it I thought CS was short for Climate Scientist, and yeah it describes their methods pretty much down pat. The use of editors as gatekeepers has no place in science, and the peer review process has demonstrated time and again that it does not create truth, it merely enforces. the status quo.

  5. I didn’t realize James Annan was this messed up. I mean, …

    This guy Thingsbreak emailed him something, Annan bought the frame hook, line and sinker, emailed “various people” and got the journal shut down.


    All within a day!

  6. Jeff says:

    I love how these desperate idiots think this whole thing is a scandal which undermines skepticism. These people live in such a closely sealed bubble it’s unbelievable. They think they win because skeptics can’t get published. Skeptics are winning because it isn’t warming.

  7. omanuel says:

    The potential serious consequences of deception about the source of energy that powers the Sun and sustains our lives is almost beyond comprehension

    Thousands or millions of human lives have been put at risk.

    Our current state of “Fuel Poverty” is disguised as a problem of CO2-induced AGW to try to conserve fuel.

    What a sad conclusion to the scientific revolution that Copernicus started in 1543 !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s