1907 Monthly Weather Review Said That Bloggers Need To Call Out NOAA/NASA Data Tampering

ScreenHunter_17 Feb. 01 08.43

docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/035/mwr-035-01-0007b.pdf

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to 1907 Monthly Weather Review Said That Bloggers Need To Call Out NOAA/NASA Data Tampering

  1. Bob Greene says:

    I’m sure they believe that they are applying new and improved methods to data presentation. The fact that the last 50 years gets warmer and the preceding 100 get colder is merely the result of the improved methods. There is no expectation bias, much less data tampering. I’m also sure that 3, 12, 16, 22, 30 and 36 are the next lottery winners. [/sarc]
    We know the warming is unprecedented, so the data must be wrong.

  2. gator69 says:

    I think they were called ‘blockers’ back then.

  3. They were lying about the climate of the Oklahoma Panhandle to attract more land jobbers, they didn’t want people back east to know the climate was very dry there.

    How did that work out for the 1930’s dust bowlers, now in California?

  4. Brian H says:

    That would make an interesting compendium: “The History of Climate Lies”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s