Different Ways Of Viewing How They Hide The Decline

NASA has wiped out the inconvenient global cooling scare, since Hansen’s 1981 graph – which showed it. Red is current GISS, black is Hansen 1981.

ScreenHunter_391 Feb. 08 22.18

A different way of looking at this is to normalize the two graphs to 1978, showing how they have massively cooled the past.

ScreenHunter_377 Feb. 08 17.47

This next graph normalizes to 1895, and shows how until 1940 it was just a fixed offset. But after 1940 they started seriously messing with the data.ScreenHunter_385 Feb. 08 19.12

Each different view provides some insight into the thought process behind the tampering.

So why would they do this?

ScreenHunter_303 Feb. 07 09.19

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Different Ways Of Viewing How They Hide The Decline

  1. Chuck says:

    This is very interesting…

  2. NikFromNYC says:

    “date: Mon Apr 28 13:14:35 2008
    from: Phil Jones
    subject: Re: FW: Talk on Understanding 20th C surface temperature
    to: “Sear, Chris (CEOSA)” , “David Parker” , “John Kennedy”

    Chris,
    David Thompson is giving a talk here tomorrow on this.
    The essence of his talk will be in Nature in a few weeks time.
    The skeptics will make a meal of this when it
    comes out, but if they did their job properly (I know this is impossible!) they would
    have found it. It relates to a problem with SST data in the late 1940s. The
    problem will get corrected for at some point. SSTs need adjusting as there must be
    from buckets for the period from Aug45 by about 0.3 gradually reducing to
    a zero adjustment by about the mid-1960s. The assumption was that after WW2 they were
    all intake measurements and didn’t need adjusting.
    This will reduce the 1940-1970 cooling in NH temps. Explaining the cooling
    with sulphates won’t be quite as necessary. It won’t change century-scale trends.”

    http://www.ecowho.com/foia.php?file=0953.txt&search=1940s

  3. Jimmy Haigh. says:

    In a word: Fraud.

  4. Password protected says:

    Dirty rotten scoundrels….
    And it’s a full time cushy government job.

  5. ArndB says:

    @”Why this blip?” AND “But after 1940 they started seriously messing with the data.”

    Tom Wigley et.al never paid any attention to the fact that SST measurement during war time (1939-1945) was, regardless of bucket or engine, very different from peace time. SEE:
    PDF 10 pages : Atlantic here: http://www.oceanclimate.de/English/Atlantic_SST_1998.pdf
    PDF 8 pages Pacific here: http://www.oceanclimate.de/English/Pacific_SST_1997.pdf
    Whatever Wigley, Jones and colleagues say about SST in the 1940s is mere speculation.

    • The really interesting thing here is the plots above do not include ocean temperatures. The climate criminals just took them along for the ride.

      • Anto says:

        Take a look here at just how far they were prepared to go:
        [i]The adjustments immediately after 1945 are expected to be as large as those made to the pre-war data (~0.3 ºC), and smaller adjustments are likely to be required in SSTs through at least the mid-1960s, by which time the observing fleet was relatively diverse and less susceptible to changes in the data supply from a single country of origin. The new adjustments are likely to have a substantial impact on the historical record of global-mean surface temperatures through the middle part of the twentieth century.[/i]
        http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2008/06/04/the-sanctity-of-climate-models/

  6. Robertv says:

    The problem is that in the real world temperatures are what they are. So a large part of humanity is preparing for the wrong stuff investing in the wrong things. This is not fraud but a crime against humanity. There must be a reason for militarizing the police and impoverishing the population. We know Government is preparing for something.

    • Gail Combs says:

      I agree.

      There is no way the top guys are not aware that we are at the tail end of the Holocene and since they are the moves being made are to make sure most of us die off very quickly while causing the least amount of problems. Getting rid of the USA strategic grain reserve and then burning all excess grain as biofuels is one example. The UN small arms treaty to disarm the masses is another and removing equipment from state National Guards is a third.

      As William McClenney a Geologist stated in a reply to a Warmist

      …we had better hope and pray some well-mixed trace gas can delay the next glacial inception. Onset of the Little Ice Age after the Medieval Warm Period, right when the Holocene reached about half a precession cycle old, was harrowing enough. The Modern Warm Period, reportedly less warm then the MWP, marks the second thermal pulse, a few centuries older than half a precession cycle, and still within the Holocene.

      If the AGW hypothesis is correct, then the Industrial Age may very well have occurred at exactly the most opportune time for H. sapiens, perhaps during the second thermal pulse, the recent grand solar maximum, at the end of the interglaciation. Treat the antithesis of AGW lightly at your peril….

      In a comment to another Warmist:

      I’m not actually opposed to what you both would prefer. I have no offspring in the offing…… It isn’t so much that I think CO2 could prevent the next glacial inception, it’s the entertainment value in watching the most progressive of us either do the wrong thing (if you are right) or, at best, an intellectually impotent thing (if you are wrong).

      Go ahead! It’s alright by me if you want to strip the most vaunted GHG from the late Holocene atmosphere. If you are right, you just plunked-down on MIS-1 repeating the extended interglacial MIS-11, for however long you fancy. Please do note, however, that MIS-11 was not all that stable a climate ride………:

      http://www.clim-past.net/6/131/2010/cp-6-131-2010.pdf

      http://www.clim-past.net/6/31/2010/cp-6-31-2010.pdf

      Even during the only post-MPT interglacial to make it past about half a precession cycle it got awfully cold between MIS-11′s two insolation peaks.

      Wouldn’t it be nice if we could smooth that over with something…………

      I do enjoy William’s wit but I am afraid it goes right over the head of most Warmists because they are either blind followers or bought and paid for enablers or worse.

      In a nutshell he is saying we are at a very low solar insolation and very near the tipping point into glaciation. We are going to stay at that very low solar insolation for the next 4,000 years and if Dr. Brown (Duke Univ) is correct the earth’s climate chaotic and bi-stable (maybe multi-stable) and we are in the instability band between the two stable ‘Strange Atractors’ – Warm Interglacial and freeze your rump off Glaciation.

      The IPCC actually said in the Science Report in TAR:
      “In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.’ – I 2001 section 4.2.2.2 page 774

      Dr. Richard Alley found in his ice core analysis “…that the last ice age came to an abrupt end over a period of only three years”

      Even Woods Hole Observatory warned about wide temperature swings a few years ago and that politicians maybe barking up the wrong tree:

      Abrupt Climate Change: Should We Be Worried?

      “….Fossil evidence clearly demonstrates that Earth vs climate can shift gears within a decade, establishing new and different patterns that can persist for decades to centuries….

      This new paradigm of abrupt climate change has been well established over the last decade by research of ocean, earth and atmosphere scientists at many institutions worldwide. But the concept remains little known and scarcely appreciated in the wider community of scientists, economists, policy makers, and world political and business leaders. Thus, world leaders may be planning for climate scenarios of global warming that are opposite to what might actually occur….”

      The only possible ‘Tipping Point’ is into glaciation not GoreBull Warming.

    • Gail Combs says:

      ARRGHhhhh, my last comment (February 9, 2014 at 2:43 pm) got kicked into the Polar Vortex!

      WordPress really does not like me. { :>(

    • Gail Combs says:

      HOLY CROW!

      I thought Europe was having a mild winter.

      Newest on Ice Age Now

      Residents woke up on Friday to find their homes buried beneath several meters of snow.

      Villagers in Madesimo had to dig their way out of their properties amid fears that their roofs could collapse.

      The snowfall follows similar scenes in neighboring Slovenia and Austria over the last few days as Europe continues trying to cope with the continuing severe weather.

      How much is “several” meters of snow? Six feet? Nine feet? They don’t bother to say.

      See video….

  7. The first graph is the best. You should be using that one.

  8. Keitho says:

    Pig dog bastards.

  9. Brian H says:

    Sorta came back to bite ’em, tho’. They “cashed in” the supposed anthro rise in advance, and then were left with nothing when more carefully documented records became the norm.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s