Why Is The Post 1940 Data Tampering So Important?

NOAA/CRU/NASA/Muller have wiped out the 1940-1970 cooling, but the historical record shows that their hockey sticks are complete crap.

In 1940, the Arctic was rapidly melting. Greenland glaciers were “nearing a catastrophe

ScreenHunter_523 Feb. 12 19.00

06 May 1940 – Greenland’s Climate Becoming Milder

The Arctic had warmed six degrees, and sea ice had thinned dramatically

ScreenHunter_524 Feb. 12 19.03

23 Feb 1940 – THE NORTH POLE. Is it Getting Warmer. | BUNDABER…

By the early, 1970’s, the arctic had cooled dramatically, glaciers and sea ice were expanding.

PaintImage10991 (1)

CIA Report 1974


PQ Archiver – ChicagoTribune.com

ScreenHunter_885 Dec. 26 08.18


ScreenHunter_39-Feb.-07-07.12 (1)


ScreenHunter_36-Feb.-07-00.051 (1)


ScreenHunter_393 May. 21 04.35

NCAR  newsweek_coolingworld.pdf

NOAA/CRU/NASA/Muller have erased the post-1940 cooling, just like they said they were going to do in their private E-mails.

Fig.A (9)



About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Why Is The Post 1940 Data Tampering So Important?

  1. Gunny G says:

    Reblogged this on BLOGGING BAD ~ DICK.G: AMERICAN ! and commented:

  2. Chewer says:

    They just didn’t remember the data from the past, so maybe a little cell time with fellow inmate Gyro Jerry might refresh their memories 😉

  3. Eric Simpson says:

    In 1961 NYT: SCIENTISTS AGREE WORLD IS COLDER; But Climate Experts Meeting Here Fail to Agree on Reasons for Change.

    Let’s see, by 1961 we’d already had a considerable increase in CO2. So why not explain the coldness by CO2? Well, I guess the leftist eco-clowns were going to wait until the ’80s and ’90s when they got a little blip of heat, and all of a sudden start jumping up and down and saying that this blip is caused… by CO2. But they might just as well have propped up CO2 to explain the cold trend after 1940, as the historical (ice core) record shows, contrary to pre-2003 ipcc claims, that there is ZERO evidence that CO2 affects temperatures… at all. That’s just the evidence, I know the luke warmers among us will say that so what about the evidence, we have a theoretical model that suggests CO2 should be warming things up, so we’re cool with that. But what about the evidence? In this key 3 minute video Al Gore is exposed for knowingly deceiving the public in his 2005 movie by presenting the discredited bs on CO2 that the ipcc had already disavowed 2 years before: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK_WyvfcJyg&info=GGWarmingSwindle_CO2Lag

  4. Andy Oz says:

    And on top of dissappearing the 40-70’s cooling. The 1992 global temperature anomaly and 2011 global temperature anomaly are the same. I.E. no warming in 20 years.

    Why are the alarmists still spruiking warming when there is none?
    Money money money! A trillion dollar artificial carbon credit market.

  5. glenncz says:

    This is an interesting paper which graphs Arctic temp.’s, We have had the same recent warming the past 30 yrs as they did in 1910-1940. Nothing remarkable or unprecedented going on. Why are we freaking out?

    Click to access 09Chlylek.pdf

  6. ArndB says:

    The period of global cooling 1940-1970 commenced in Europe in winter 1939/40 see:
    ___Giss- Global T°C anomaly map 1st Quarter: http://www.seaclimate.com/c/c1/images/buch/big/C1_6.png
    ___Annual temp-trend Northern Europe: http://www.seaclimate.com/a/a3/mid/big/A3_1.jpg
    ___Copenhagen T anomaly Jan/Feb: http://www.seaclimate.com/a/a3/mid/big/A3_2.jpg
    A good case to study the impact of human activities in weather-making.

  7. omanuel says:

    All data tampering is serious.

    Scientists that accept public funds for deceiving the public are simply well-paid prostitutes.

    • Shazaam says:

      Erm… It’s the taxpayers who are getting screwed…… Unwillingly…..

      Just sayin’……

    • Gail Combs says:

      Do not insult the world’s oldest profession, who do not lie and are trying to make an honest living.

      Also they do not want to rule the world the CAGW Hoax pushers do and are not responsible for a millions of deaths via fuel poverty and starvation.

  8. X says:

    Now they don’t have to explain “why the blip”! 🙂
    These people are really good clowns, it’s almost impossible not to laugh with what they do.

  9. X says:

    Compare for example, the global temps of GISS graph above with RSS

    How ridiculously different they are! 🙂

  10. kuhnkat says:

    Don’t the models have a problem showing wide changes, especially reversals, in the temps over such short periods?!?!

  11. jon2009 says:

    “NOAA/CRU/NASA/Muller have erased the post-1940 cooling, just like they said they were going to do in their private E-mails.”
    Where can I find those emails?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s