80 years ago, 80% of the US was covered with drought.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
-
Join 1,961 other subscribers
Recent Comments
New Mexico is definitely back in drought conditions. Extremely dry winter for most of the state. The entire month of January didn’t have a single snowflake or drop of rain in Albuquerque.
I’m looking at the Santa Fe Ski Basin right now. Excellent snow conditions.
Is it a drought, or just normal weather in those places? Anything that goes on for 80 years and longer may be its normal climate.
The concept that any region has a range of drought/weather/climate conditions is the norm seems to be beyond the mental capabilities of the Hit on Head by Falling Sky ACKKKKK! We are All Gonna Die folks.
When things get way out of the regular range for a long period of time is when you need to pay attention.
Houston, we have a problem…this pre-massaging just won’t do. NASA is going to have to hire a precipitation adjustment ‘team’.
Severe drought California, transport the salmon by truck!!!!! http://www.sacbee.com/2014/03/10/6226163/in-severe-drought-plan-california.html
Watch where this goes. If we have a drought or not won’t be the discussion anymore. What is going to count is if we transported the Salmon yeas or no.
Love to see the salmon return from sea in a few years looking for a truck to return them to their breeding grounds.
This environmentalists get crazier every day.
As if droughts in the passed affected the survival of the salmon.
If there is a drought and the salmon can’t reach the ocean they try the next year. So what’s the problem.
The following must be extremely disappointing news for alarmists. Once again, nature proves more resilient than the increasingly wrong predictions of climate scientists.
“We were entirely surprised to find living coral reef under such harsh conditions,” the research team reported Thursday in the journal Scientific Reports. “Extensive coral reefs do not typically develop under conditions where nutrient and suspended sediment concentrations are acutely or chronically very high.”
http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-coral-reef-iraq-persian-gulf-20140307,0,614996.story
What Drought?
I got stuck in mud up to my ankles and then was Rammed by a 120 lb Ewe. Legs don’t bend sideways very well I found out.
Actually 2013 was the first time in the 20 years I have lived in mid NC that the grass was green all summer and the white clover did not die back. Now if I can make it through mud season without another injury. {:>)
All ENSO climate models say Australia is DOOMED by October this year.
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/enso/
If true, that normally means north America gets a major wet season.
Either way, CO2 has nothing to do with it, and a carbon tax won’t stop it.
All our troubles can be solved by dumping lotsa more CO2 into the atmosphere. Trust me on this.