US Invaded By Complete Lunatics, AKA Known As Progressives

The US has been taken over by severely mentally ill people.

An Ohio high school student has already been jailed and kicked out of school for having a pocket knife in his car, and now he fears he could lose his dream of serving in the Army.

Jordan Wiser, a student at Ashtabula County Technical School in Jefferson, is finishing up his senior year from home after school officials searched his car in December and found the folding knife and an Airsoft gun. School officials called police, who charged him with illegal conveyance of a weapon onto a school ground based on the three-inch knife.

“I declined to allow them to search myself or my car and that I wanted to talk to my lawyer or my father,” Wiser told “They told me it wasn’t an option.”

Wiser, an EMT trainee who hopes to become both a police officer and a soldier, spent 13 days in the Ashtabula County Jail following the incident. The knife, which Wiser said is part of his first responder’s kit and can be used for slicing an accident victim’s seatbelt, was found tucked inside his EMT medical vest in the trunk of the car. The Airsoft gun, which fires non-lethal pellets, was not illegal and was used by Wiser in a shooting club he belongs to, he said.

High school senior jailed, kicked out of school and may lose Army dream because of pocket knife in car | Fox News

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to US Invaded By Complete Lunatics, AKA Known As Progressives

  1. jdseanjd says:

    Reminds me of the truly Orwellian World we inhabit.

    During the Russian revolution, the winning faction of Marxists called themselves the Bolsheviks, meaning the majority. They were, of course, a tiny minority of professional revolutionaries.

    The “Progressives” now are intent on dragging us back to a deindustrialised feudal system, with the “unsustainable”, as Maurice Strong terms them, middle class done away with. This is the end game for for the 1%s running the CAGW/CC scare scam: a world govt of the 1%s & a serf class to satisfy their needs. The Hunger Games is the World they have planned for us.

    I wonder how many of the mad Marxists of the BBC & the “Environmentalist” NGOs, such as Greenpiss etc, are on “Surplus to requirements” lists?

    As, indeed, the Bolsheviks disposed of many of their fellow plotters who knew too much.

    We live in interesting times.

    • Tel says:

      No country can afford to de-industrialise, if they do they will be a sitting duck for military action by their neighbours.

      • jdseanjd says:

        Yet the US & UK are busy de-industrialising. Capital has exported manufacturing jobs to cheap labour countries, like China. Northern UK is now no longer a manufacturing hub, it’s an economic wasteland.
        Obarmy’s chief science adviser, Holdren, co-authored a book with “We’re all doomed”, “The Population Bomb” eejit Paul Ehrlich, back in the 70s, I think, on de-industrialising the US.
        Just goes to prove Steve’s point. The 1%s, banksters & politicians in power are mad as hatters.
        If you research UN Agenda 21, you will see that the eventual aims include the disposal of 13 of 14 people now alive, especially the middle class.
        Also planned: The abolition of private property, the family, & separate nations to bring One World Govt to power, after the next, & planned, world financial crash.

        Google Agenda 21 for dummies.

      • jdseanjd says:

        & Obarmy wants to cancel your Tomahawks.

        There’s only one way to figure that out.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Nicely stated and all true unfortunately.

      It amazes me how many people want to become serfs or have never read what happens to the ‘Surplus Traitors’ after the revolution when the core group is consolidating their position.

      As a dictator would you trust PROVEN traitors on the periphery of your core group?

      History shows Dictators don’t.


      blockquote>Just to give perspective on this incredible murder by government, if all these bodies were laid head to toe, with the average height being 5′, then they would circle the earth ten times. Also, this democide murdered 6 times more people than died in combat in all the foreign and internal wars of the century. Finally, given popular estimates of the dead in a major nuclear war, this total democide is as though such a war did occur, but with its dead spread over a century.


      Figures and Tables
      Forward (by Irving Louis Horowitz)

      1. 169,202,000 Murdered: Summary and Conclusions [20th Century Democide]

      2. The New Concept of Democide [Definition of Democide]
      3. Over 133,147,000 Murdered: Pre-Twentieth Century Democide

      4. 61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State
      5. 35,236,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill
      6. 20,946,000 Murdered: The Nazi Genocide State
      7. 10,214,000 Murdered: The Depraved Nationalist Regime

      8. 5,964,000 Murdered: Japan’s Savage Military
      9. 2,035,000 Murdered: The Khmer Rouge Hell State
      10. 1,883,000 Murdered: Turkey’s Genocidal Purges
      11. 1,670,000 Murdered: The Vietnamese War State
      12. 1,585,000 Murdered: Poland’s Ethnic Cleansing
      13. 1,503,000 Murdered: The Pakistani Cutthroat State
      14. 1,072,000 Murdered: Tito’s Slaughterhouse

      15. 1,663,000 Murdered? Orwellian North Korea
      16. 1,417,000 Murdered? Barbarous Mexico
      17. 1,066,000 Murdered? Feudal Russia

      But the useful idiots still fall for the lies.

  2. jdseanjd says:

    More directly to the point of this story: you WILL be completely defenseless.
    You WILL be easy to be robbed, raped, pillaged & eventually herded into a FEMA camp for “Disposal”.
    We live in interesting times.

    • squid2112 says:

      And they wonder why occasionally someone becomes unhinged and shoots up a restaurant or mall or school. This has never been a mystery to me. The only mystery is why it doesn’t happen more often.

      All this does is create more fuel for fire….

  3. Anto says:

    I’m not normally a fan of Americans’ overly aggressive culture of suing at the drop of a hat, but this poor kid should take these clowns to the cleaners.

    • Tel says:

      Actually, that’s really his only option at this stage. Unless he goes in for a big payout his life will be ruined. It’s the only way he can restore his good name.

      It’s getting to the stage where you need a lawyer’s number on the “panic” button of your mobile phone. They will probably be selling this as a service before long, like an EPIRB but it summons lawyers.

  4. Robertv says:

    Yes the US has been taken over by severely mentally ill people. And don’t forget the EU is more or less the same story.

      • Gail Combs says:

        Not suprising since the department of defense in there training classes on Terrorists now cite the founding fathers as examples of “Extremist Ideologies” and I quote:

        D. Extremist Ideologies
        1. Introduction
        • As noted, an ideology is a set of political beliefs about the nature of people and society. People who are committed to an ideology seek not only to persuade but to recruit others to their belief. In U.S. history, there are many examples of extremist ideologies and movements. The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule and the Confederate states who sought to secede from the Northern states are just two examples.
        • While not all ideologists are violent in nature, it is characteristic of ideology to be action-oriented and to regard action in terms of a military analogy. How often have you heard words such as struggle, resist, march, victory, and overcome when reading about or talking to ideologists about their beliefs?

        2. Ideologies
        a. Nationalism – The policy of asserting that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations. Many nationalist groups take it a step further and believe that their national culture and interests are superior to any other national group.

        b. Supremacy – The belief that one’s race or ethnicity is superior to all others and should dominate society. Supremacy, as with racial supremacies in general, has frequently resulted in anti-Black and anti-Semitic violence.

        c. Separatism – Setting oneself or others apart based on culture, ethnicity, race, or religion.

        FOIA document obtained from the Department of Defense entiled: AFSS 0910 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND TREATMENT INCIDENTS (EOTI) LESSON PLAN

        The whole document obtained by Judicial Watch.

    • DirkH says:

      Nope. We don’t punish anyone. If you belong to the right “minority” you can even kill a German and leave court a free man.

  5. Ragtag Media says:

    He has to be found guilty by a jury of his “peers” first.
    If they do not recognize the sillyness and over zelousness of his arrest and find him guilty, then the society should be blamed, not the 1%.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Unfortunately the US Kelptocracy is doing away with the jury of his “peers”

      The 6th and 11th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article 3 Section 2 give US citizens the right to a trial. But as Joan Biskupic stated

      “Anyone accused of a crime in this country is entitled to a jury trial.”

      The Constitution may say so but, in fact, this is simply not the case — and becoming less so as politicians fiddle with legal definitions and sentencing standards in order specifically to reduce the number of persons entitled to a trial….

      ….As Thomas Jefferson put it to Tom Paine in a 1789 letter, “I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.” ….

      Here is how the politicians have gotten around the US Constitution to make sure citizens are denied their right to a trial:

      The Seventh Amendment, passed by the First Congress without debate, cured the omission by declaring that the right to a jury trial shall be preserved in common-law cases…

      The Supreme Court has, however, arrived at a more limited interpretation. It applies the amendment’s guarantee to the kinds of cases that “existed under the English common law when the amendment was adopted,”

      The right to trial by jury is not constitutionally guaranteed in certain classes of civil cases that are concededly “suits at common law,” particularly when “public” or governmental rights are at issue and if one cannot find eighteenth-century precedent for jury participation in those cases. Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission (1977). Thus, Congress can lodge personal and property claims against the United States in non-Article III courts with no jury component. In addition, where practice as it existed in 1791 “provides no clear answer,” the rule is that “[o]nly those incidents which are regarded as fundamental, as inherent in and of the essence of the system of trial by jury, are placed beyond the reach of the legislature.” Markman v. Westview Instruments (1996). In those situations, too, the Seventh Amendment does not restrain congressional choice.

      In contrast to the near-universal support for the civil jury trial in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, modern jurists consider civil jury trial neither “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,” Palko v. State of Connecticut (1937), nor “fundamental to the American scheme of justice,” Duncan v. Louisiana (1968).

      Now that last sentence should be chilling information to anyone looking to the US Justice system for justice.

      The tenth amendment to the US constitution says:
      “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”….

      However history shows a relentless accumulation of power into the hands of ruling elites and it has been accelerating in the last hundred years.

      There are a couple of other parts to the transfer of power from the people and states to the federal government.

      (1) 1913 Seventeenth Amendment – The change from the Senate representing the STATES point of view with the two senators picked by the state legislators to the Senate being a clone of the House and therefore subject to the same MSM propaganda from the banker owned MSM (J. P. Morgan bought up the important newspapers in 1915 and has been in control of the media to this day.)

      (2) 1913 Sixteenth Amendment – Taxes collected from the citizens of the state and then handed back to the state with lots of strings attached. ie if you do not lower speed limits to 55 you get no Federal highway money….

      (3) The granting of legislative power to the executive branch. This includes not only bureaucrats like the EPA and FDA making ‘Regulations’ with the same clout as a Congressional law but Executive Orders. (The Supreme Court ruled this was OK if there was a Federal Register where citizens could comment on the regulations. Ever seen anything about that RIGHT in any high school class??? Also did the over 5000 He!! NO’s! and very few YES! stop the bureaucrats from giving us Animal ID???)

      (3) The trashing of the US jury system and the removal of the citizens RIGHT to judge both the accused AND THE LAW. This right is critical because it allows citizens the final say on laws and regulations. Therefore it was absolutely necessary for the ruling class to demolish this right.

      They did so by:
      (3a) First making sure jurors are not informed of their rights and duties as jurors. (see Fully Informed Jury Movement)
      (3b) Second by giving bureaucratic departments a ‘within house Judicial Tribunal’ that replaces the trial by jury, as well as complex ‘regulations’ no one can understand. In this way the Supreme Court intentionally trashed the Constitution and Amendment VII.

      “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved….” ~ Amendment VII

      Pretty darn clear isn’t it? But the Supreme Court doesn’t think so. So there went our last constraint on the Federal government.

      Without a trial by jury we lost our RIGHT to overrule idiotic laws and regulations.

  6. gator69 says:

    I spent virtually my entire childhood as a menace to society, and never knew it. Amazing we all survived.

  7. jdseanjd says:

    Thanks for your endorsement Gail.
    Here’s 80 million more deaths by govt. The US govt via the EPA:
    June 1972, Ruckleshaus, new head of the EPA, banned DDT as a carcinogen.
    It wasn’t.
    the Sweeny report, April ’72 found DDT non-carcinogenic.
    People ate it for 2 years in one test.

    Ruckelshaus never bothered to read the Sweeny report.

    DDT was a most effective anti malarial agent, cheap & out of patent.

    Since the “ban”, over 2 million people in the third world have died of malaria every year, mostly children. Previously, malaria was almost whipped, worldwide deaths were down to ~50,000 pa.

    Ironically, DDT was never officially banned. Countries were just told that they would receive no more foreign aid if they persisted in their use of DDT.

    Global Warming & foreign aid are for genocide.

    Around 84 million deaths since ’72.


    • Gail Combs says:

      There may have been a hidden agenda behind the banning of DDT especially in third world countries. – Population Control.
      This is getting a bit into conspiracy territory since it is very speculative but there is a lot of data out there supporting a covert agenda to curb the “population explosion” Also the timing is about right.
      (1972 the time of the First Earth Summit chaired by Maurice Strong.)

      The 1974 CIA report:
      “A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems”

      Since 1972 the grain crisis has intensified…. Since 1969 the storage of grain has decreased from 600 million metric tons to less than 100 million metric tons – a 30 day supply… many governments have gone to great lengths to hide their agricultural predicaments from other countries as well as from their own people…

      pg 9
      The archaeologists and climatotologists document a rather grim history… There is considerable evidence that these empires may not have been undone by barbarian invaders but by climatic change…. has tied several of these declines to specific global cool periods, major and minor, that affected global atmospheric circulation and brought wave upon wave of drought to formerly rich agricultural lands….

      Page 18 [talks of coming glaciation] </i?
      Scientists are confident that unless man is able to effectively modify the climate, the northern regions… will again be covered with 100 to 200 feet of ice and snow. That this will occur within the nexy 2,500 years they are quite positive; that it may occur sooner is open to speculation….

      The Wisconsin analysis questions whether a return to these climate conditions could support a population that has grown from 1.1 billion in 1850 to 3.75 billion in 1970. The Wisconsin group predicted that the climate could not support the world’s population since technology offers no immediate solution. Further world grain reserves currently amount to less than one month; thus any delay in supplies implies mass starvation. They also contended that new crop strains could not be developed over night… Moreover they observed that agriculture would become even more energy dependent in a world of declining resources.

      Holdren and the other Malthusians from Stanford University are not alone. The US government has been behind then since BEFORE the book Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions (1973) was published. That book just echoed the real thoughts of the US government of that time.

      Are we headed into glaciation? Heck if I know but given the subdued solar insolation at the possible tail end of the Holocene, the focus of science ONLY on Global Warming with the stated aim of destroying our present technological society is down right weird. Actually it strikes me as mass suicide at least for most of the peasants. This is especially true given the USA got rid of the strategic grain reserves in 1996 then ran the the grain silos dry by 2008. Now the USA is burning any excess grain as bio-fuel and the grain storage silos have been destroyed.

      Agenda 21 with its emphasis on apartments in Transit Villages traps the majority of humans in cities with no land and no possibility of learning survival skills.
      People will be completely dependent on government and corporations for their survival.

      In other words the current US policies put us in the same position that the Little Ice Age peasants were in except there are more of us and we are completely dependent on fossil fuel and a ‘Just-in-Time’ delivery system for our food. Also GMO crops being genetically the same are more vulnerable to nature.
      Purdue university found commercial chickens were lacking in the genetic diversity needed to make them ‘Robust’

      So one of the questions, at least in my mind is when did the USA take a U-turn from encouraging a good economy and why. I think we can pin point it to the early 1970s.

      There is other data as I said. Vaccines: Infertility, Sterilisation & Abortion: A covert-sterilisation programme using vaccines

      Speculative but there is alternate data that support the above collection of articles:

      In Chapter 2, Barney Cohen reviews levels, differentials, and trends in fertility for more than 30 countries from 1960 to 1992. He finds evidence of fertility decline in Botswana, Kenya, and Zimbabwe, confirming the basic results of the DHS. What is new here though is his finding that the fertility decline appears to have occurred across cohorts of women at all parities, rather than just among women at middle and higher parities, as might have been expected on the basis of experience in other parts of the world. He also presents evidence that fertility may have begun to fall in parts of Nigeria and possibly in Senegal.

      This is the type of fertility profile you would expect ifaA’ covert-sterilisation programme’was in place
      Another interesting fact is Julian Huxley a Eugenicist, was first Director-General of UNESCO.

      “UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy” (1946)
      After becoming the first director-general of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in 1945, Huxley published “UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy.” This manifesto outlined both the broad goals of this newly established organization and Huxley’s stance on how UNESCO should attempt to address them. More telling, however, was the degree to which Huxley’s publication reflected his views on eugenics.

      He contended, in the 1946 publication, that UNESCO’s goals included “international peace and security, collaboration among the nations, and human welfare” as well as “The furtherance of the democratic principles of the dignity, equality and mutual respect of men, as well as respect for justice, for the rule of law and for the human rights and fundamental freedoms affirmed in the Charter of the United Nations” (Huxley, 1946).

      Huxley put a uniquely eugenic spin on these goals, however, arguing that true human welfare could only be accomplished if individuals pursued the most desirable direction in human evolution. He argued that in particular that, in addition to educational reform, UNESCO’s key goals should be to promote population control and ‘the eugenic problem’ (Toye, 2010: 327).


      OH, and you can add the seed banks, DNA testing (and banking) of all babies born in the USA and UK, DNA banks for 4-H livestock. Not to mention the USDA providing the funds for development of Epicyte’s spermicidal corn.

      Also in 1976, the U.S. government signed a UN document that declared:

      Land … cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice;

      D-1. Government must control the use of land to achieve equitable distribution of resources;

      D-2. Control land use through zoning and land-use planning;

      D-3. Excessive profits from land use must be recaptured by government;

      D-4. Public ownership of land should be used to exercise urban and rural land reform;

      D-5. Owner rights should be separated from development rights, which should be held by a public authority.

      This document was signed on behalf of the U.S. by Carla A. Hills, then secretary of housing and urban development, and William K. Reilly, then head of the Conservation Fund, who later became the administrator of the EPA.

      Do I trust the US government to protect the best interests of the American people No Way in He!! !

      • jdseanjd says:

        100% agree, Gail, Agenda 21 is a depopulation, eugenicist plan, designed to bring, IMHO, the Earths numbers down to a controllable level.

        The issue is not “sustainability”, it’s control by the 1%s, the Banksters, & their dupes & bagmen the Marxist “Greenies”, the Malthusian control freak cowards.

        Compare the eejit Ehrlich with the hero Borlaug.

        & what gets taught in schools? Ehrlich.
        We have a job of reconstruction on our hands after the next crash/catastrophe.

        John D.

  8. Chip Bennett says:

    Under Ohio castle doctrine, the castle extends to one’s vehicle. The knife was legal for him to possess, and was not attempted to be taken from the vehicle into the Defenseless Victim Zone.

    I would sue the school, and fight against any ambiguity in the law regarding boundaries between one’s castle and Defenseless Victim Zone.

    Also: I want to see this “facebook post” through which the school claims that it had “probable cause” to search his car.

    • Gail Combs says:

      It does not matter if they had “probable cause” to search his car. He was not IN his car and therefore they needed a warrant. (No justification as ‘Hot pursuit”)

  9. Truthseeker says:

    Pardon my ignorance about US law, but I thought that enlisting was still possible for convicted felons? Regardless of how stupid and wrong it is to classify these events as a “crime”, I do not see how it would stop the person from enlisting. Have things changed from the “good ol’ days”?

  10. Brian H says:

    Like expelling kids for making pretend pistols with their fingers. Deliberately vindictive.

    BTW; “AKA Known As: makes no sense. AKA means Also Known As, so you just said “Also Known As Known As”.. Duh.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s