How The Big Lie Is Being Constructed

There are two key components to the big climate lie.

  1. Tampering with temperature data
  2. Lying about climate history. The goal is to convince people that the climate is “getting worse” and that it will continue to “get worse.

Climate change politics is straight out of the worst annals of human history, back to the days of burning witches for cooking the weather. Who could have imagined this would happen in the 21st century?

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to How The Big Lie Is Being Constructed

  1. Gunny G says:

    Reblogged this on CLINGERS… BLOGGING BAD ~ DICK.G: AMERICAN ! and commented:

  2. gator69 says:

    “Who could have imagined this would happen in the 21st century?”

    Right. Because Orwell envisioned it would be the 20th century.

    • omanuel says:

      FEAR of nuclear annihilation convinced world leaders to :

      1. Form the UN on 24 Oct 1945
      2. Hide the source of energy in cores of
      _ a.) Heavy atoms like Uranium
      _ b.) Ordinary stars like the Sun

      The lies started in 1946, and George Orwell started writing “Nineteen Eighty-Four in 1946.

  3. Ragtag Media says:

    This fiend Greg Laden sounds right out of Nazi propaganda ministry

  4. geran says:

    3. Lying about the science, to include computer models that do not work.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Not only that but the IPCC even ADMITTED that not only do they not work, there is no hope that they ever will work.

      The IPCC actually said in the Science Report in TAR:

      “…in climate research and modeling we should recognise that we are dealing with a complex non linear chaotic signature and therefore that long-term prediction of future climatic states is not possible…”

      IPCC 2001 section page 774


  5. Gail Combs says:

    Don Easterbrook has a neat graph that shows temperature change within a century for various time periods in a the GISP2 Greenland ice core compared to the change in the 20th century.
    Graph: past temperature oscillations compare with recent global warming (1977-1998)


  6. Shazaam says:

    Can we have “Climatologist Burnings” for “cooking the data” and “cooking the computer-generated fantasy climate model results” ?

    I mean after all, if they burned witches for allegedly cooking weather, I think there is a far, far better modern-day case for burning the climatologists who “cook the data”.

  7. Yet there are clear antecedents–albeit totally within science, and no political coercion–going all the way back to the inauguration of the current scientific paradigm, of undirected evolution of all that we observe in the world today. The origin of today’s climate science tyranny lies in the long years of dogmatic assertion of favored theories as unquestionable fact, with the ever increasing suppression of contrary facts; it is no surprise to me that the process of promulgating scientific dogma as fact finally has spilled over into political abuse, on a worldwide scale (it was science that first made its dogmas sacrosanct, worldwide–literally “throwing the baby out with the bath water” for the last 160 years, in order to demonize any idea connected with, or even falsely imagined to be connected with, religion or a belief in God).

    And only my scientific research, into the true origin of all the “ancient mysteries”, of ancient religious import, gets to the heart of the fundamental human problem, that has plagued mankind through all of known history. Mine is the greatest discovery in all of history, yet the world is so awash in unreasoning anger and fear, and science so abused as to be just another religion, that I literally have no scientific peers–really competent, and honest, scientists–to turn to (as I have found out over the last 11 years of seeking such).

  8. Cheshirered says:

    Harry, when is your book out? I’d like to buy a copy please.

  9. De Paus says:

    Dear mister Goddard, would you be so kind as to put this hyperlink to the Piers Corbyn comment on your website:

    Mar31st UN (IPCC) Climate Change Latest Alarmism
    “The latest spoutings of The (UN IPCC) CO2 warmists sect are desperate Gobbels-esque deluded baseless alarmist nonsense which if turned into policy will be a real threat to the world economy and world stability, rather than would any actual changes in climates across the world. The CO2 climate warmist con and all the anti-scientific parasites, politicians, green spongers and Climate Tourists it supports must be destroyed.”
    – Piers Corbyn, astrophysicist WeatherAction, provenly successful Long range weather and Climate forecasters, 31 March 2014

    “The Latest IPCC screechings (eg via ) are not science but a self-serving political scam to deceive, control, manipulate and exploit the populations of countries for which this proven delusional, anti-scientific cancer hold sway.
    The actual FACTS of the CO2 warmist story rather than the brain-washing promoted by warmist polticians and gravy-train passengers – who are either logically challenged or brazen liars, are:
    – See
    1. There is NO EVIDENCE for CO2 Warmist claims – Only evidence against.
    2. The Jet Stream is the arbiter of extreme weather and real natural climate change yet the CO2 theory cannot explain or predict its recent wild behavior (which happened in previous Mini-Ice-Ages); while solar activity has done so, is doing so and will continue to so do.
    3. ALL the alarmist claims of the CO2 warmists since 2010 have FAILED and this latest sad catalogue of zany fiction and alarmist nonsense will also fail.
    4. The observed FACT is the world is at the beginings of a predicted natural mini-ice-age and the many wild extremes to come in a general cooling context must be prepared for. However the IPCC and the thieves kitchen of the UN is pointing the world in the wrong direction from which economies will collapse and millions will die of hunger if the deluded warmist policies, taxes and surcharges are adopted.
    “WE CHALLENGE ANY representative of the CO2 Warmist camp to public evidence-based debate.
    “The difference between us and these fraudsters, climate charlatans and tax grabbers is that we support and carry-out the scientific method whereas the CO2 warmist sect and their heirs of Goebbels in the BBC and other media do the opposite.”

  10. omanuel says:

    Rather than re-construct the Lie, the UN’s IPCC might better study the children’s story of Humpty Dumpty (now that the truth is out):

    “All the King’s horses and all the King’s men” (including pseudo-scientists with Nobel Prizes) “couldn’t put Humpty Dumpty back together again.”

    Nine pages of precise experimental data (pp 19-27 of my biography [1]) show without doubt that

    1. Neutrons repel other neutrons
    2. Stars make and discard hydrogen
    3. The Sun itself
    _ a.) Made our elements
    _ b.) Birthed the Solar System 5 Ga ago
    _ c.) Sustained life’s origin and evolution on Earth after 3.5 Ga ago
    _ d.) Still controls every atom, life and world in the Solar System now.

    1. “A Journey to the core of the Sun” – Chapter 2: Acceptance of Reality

  11. Psalmon says:

    California being pummeled by drought. See charts from NWS Sacramento:


  12. Psalmon says:

    I would add:
    3. Report (or ignore) current events in a way to fit the narrative.

    When media talk about the CA drought, they ignore the heavy rains and snows of the past month, and they show pictures of CA reservoirs in January. This is not just lazy, it’s deceitful.

    Any Big Lie requires an active and engaged press reporting the current events in such an altered form to create essentially propaganda.

  13. D. Self says:

    NBC just aired the UN report and interviewed Openheimer (liar), and he said our corn and other crops continue to decline. I am pretty sure the US had a record corn crop last year. Heck the corn around here(SE Mi.) was as tall as I have ever seen last year.

    • omanuel says:

      Yes, but farmers here in SE Missouri tell me the ground is still unseasonably cold this year.

      • Gail Combs says:

        It is a cold start to spring except for the far west coast. We are having our first week with the temps in the 70s this week here in mid NC We get normally see temps in the 80s this time of year yet we had 21 °F last Thursday.

        We are a good 10 °F colder than we were for the month of March ten years ago.

      • Robertv says:

        So how did our grandparents survive when it was MUCH colder than today ? Producing wine in Britain during the roman occupation also must be a lie. Maybe they constructed the walls to keep the cold out.

        • James the Elder says:

          MY grandparents, born in the 1870s survived by cutting timber in spring, letting it dry during summer and burning massive amounts to keep warm in winter. My parents, born in the 19-teens burned oil, also in massive amounts. Both did not worry why the 1930s were so damnably hot; they coped. I, from the 1940s, can remember sub-zero winters and 105+ summers, and now it seems another cycle of same has begun. I will cope. Try your sarc on someone who gives a damn.

  14. Andy Oz says:

    Alaskans celebrate that Global Warming is on the way!!

  15. Andy DC says:

    We just had another “last gasp” of winter in the Washington, DC area with yet another snowfall yesterday. Dulles Airport is just concluding its snowiest and 2nd coldest March on record.

  16. Andy Oz says:

    Climate alarmists cooking up new taxes and research grant funding schemes to screw Joe public even more. I don’t know what the collective plural of sociopath is but there is a mob of them at the IPCC.

    “Global adaptation cost estimates are substantially greater than current adaptation funding and investment, particularly in developing countries, suggesting a funding gap and a growing adaptation deficit (limited evidence, medium confidence). The most recent global adaptation cost estimates suggest a range from $70 billion to $100 billion per year globally by 2050, but there is little confidence in these numbers. The evidence base is limited and there is strong evidence of important omissions and shortcomings in data and methods rendering these estimates highly preliminary (high confidence). Comparison of the global cost estimates with the current level of adaptation funding shows the projected global needs to be orders of magnitude greater than current investment levels particularly in developing countries(limited evidence). [17.4.1, 17.4.2, 17.4.4].

    Click to access WGIIAR5-Chap17_FGDall.pdf

    • gator69 says:

      Yes, adapting to climate change is going to be difficult and expensive. How will we ever hope to survive as a species?

  17. Psalmon says:

    Snowing insanely hard in the Sierra Nevada. Amazing live cam at Kirkwood ski area. Can’t see the lift!

  18. Ivan says:

    This is all being set up to suspend the democratic process in 2016 and declare a state of national emergency and/or martial law. Of course, it will need to go on for decades until the climate emergency is stabilised. By 2016 there will be more than 50% of the population dependant on government handouts, so it will become a fait accompli without a murmur. In fact, people will be glad to be spared the inconvenience of having to get up off their arse and vote from time to time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s