New York Times Explains The Mindset Of Global Warming Fascists

The play of tolerance opposes the principle of monstrous certainty that is endemic to fascism and, sadly, not just fascism but all the various faces of fundamentalism. When we think we have certainty, when we aspire to the knowledge of the gods, then Auschwitz can happen and can repeat itself. Arguably, it has repeated itself in the genocidal certainties of past decades.

The pursuit of scientific knowledge is as personal an act as lifting a paintbrush or writing a poem, and they are both profoundly human. If the human condition is defined by limitedness, then this is a glorious fact because it is a moral limitedness rooted in a faith in the power of the imagination, our sense of responsibility and our acceptance of our fallibility. We always have to acknowledge that we might be mistaken. When we forget that, then we forget ourselves and the worst can happen.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to New York Times Explains The Mindset Of Global Warming Fascists

  1. Jimbo says:

    For anyone who is interested here are a few examples of the green roots of the Nazi party and green fascists.

    • Andy Oz says:

      Alarmists and their mouthpieces have recently been demanding Skeptics and scientists who don’t agree with the settled science catastrophy meme, be sent to new death camps. Climate fundamentalism is as dangerous to society as any other type, and is highly desirable by the elites as a means of control, distraction and new tax introduction on the unwashed masses. That is why it is persistent.

  2. Psalmon says:

    The subject of the article notwithstanding, it makes you wonder if they down a bunch of narcotics, have a moment of clarity, write this, and then when sober, forget what they penned. Amazing.

  3. BobW in NC says:


  4. Organic Fool says:

    Climate Professor Quits Biased Global Warming IPCC

    “Dutch Professor Richard Tol has resigned from the Climate Panel of the UN. Professor Tol disagrees with the biased negative conclusions of the latest UN climate report. The consequences of climate change are being systematically over-estimated, according to him.
    Professor Tol”The Panel is directed from within the environment lobby and not from within the science.”

    The UN IPCC presented its fifth climate report in Yokohama at the end of last month. The IPCC says if there are no changes in world-wide climate policies then the chance of calling a halt to further warming of the earth will be lost, says the report’s most important conclusion and warning.

    But, according to Professor of Climate Economy Tol, the tone of the report is grossly “alarming and apocalyptic”.

  5. Organic Fool says:


    “The message has been loud and clear for many years—a community of scientists insisting that human activity is warming our planet, taking humanity to the edge of a precipice. But now, as science begins to understand earth’s place in the electric solar system, the meaning of the present warming plateau becomes clearer. The Earth-Sun connection, together with the Sun’s galactic environment, can help to explain climate extremes of every kind.

    Today, new voices and new perspectives are bridging the theoretical gaps, and independent investigations have reached some startling conclusions. No one can know the future, but some of the electrical changes in our solar system could point to catastrophic change on the horizon.”
    (reposted from The Thunderbolts Project Facebook

  6. -=NikFromNYC=- says:

    “Aparayle is apayred. Al sadness is decayde
    The garmentes ar gone that longed to honestye.
    And in newe sortes newe Foles ar arayede
    Despisynge the costom of good antiquyte.
    Mannys fourme is disfigured with euery degre
    As Knyght Squyer yeman Jentilman and knaue,
    For al in theyr goynge vngoodely them behaue”

    – Sebastian Black (The Ship of Fools, 1496)

  7. Andy Oz says:

    The complete version of this is so full of holes, it’s like Swiss cheese.
    Turkey’s ocean “acidity” graph was in it. The sea will be neutral in a few decades.
    What a joke.

  8. Andy DC says:

    An excellent description of what the scientifc method is supposed to be, something climate “scientists” corrupted and destroyed a long time ago. The climate change cult is obviously a political movement where science is not even incidental.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s