Climategate Scientists Getting Rid Of The 1940’s Temperature Spike In The Arctic

As of 2011, NASA showed a large spike in eastern Arctic temperatures around the year 1940

ScreenHunter_159 Apr. 13 05.51

During the previous year, climategate scientists discussed their desire to get rid of the 1940s spike

From: Tom Wigley <>
To: Phil Jones <>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

By 2013, they had done exactly what they wanted to – removed the 1930s-1940s blip

ScreenHunter_158 Apr. 13 05.51

They accomplished this by an impressive 2 degrees (3.6F) of data tampering, lowering 1940 temperatures and increasing present temperatures.

ScreenHunter_157 Apr. 13 05.50

So were the Climategate scientists justified in removing the 1940s Arctic spike? Scientists in 1940 reported 6C warming and rapidly disappearing ice. The warming was real, and modern climate scientists are trying to rewrite history.

 Polar Meltdown

ScreenHunter_107 Feb. 17 07.17

Papers Past — Auckland Star — 14 December 1940 — WARMER ARCTIC


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Climategate Scientists Getting Rid Of The 1940’s Temperature Spike In The Arctic

  1. omanuel says:

    Steven, as we move to conclusion of the AGW debate, we can anticipate desperate, last-minute attempts to diverted attention to other issues.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Oliver, the Puppetmasters will just come up with a new crisis and move on leaving their henchmen, the ‘Climate Scientists,’ hanging in the breeze, the target of the wrath of the population.

      This is why we are seeing these extreme, desperate, last-minute attempts to pull the hoax out of the flames. This is why Trenberth was going ballistic and frothing at the mouth in the April 11 presentation. He knows his days are numbered if he can not pull CAGW out of the hat and Mother Nature is not cooperating.

      He also knows those who are not wedded to the Democratic party are getting disgusted with all the corruption and incompetence in D.C.
      March 21, 2014 Rasmussen poll: Congressional Performance
      Incumbents, Beware: Just 29% Think You Deserve Reelection to Congress

      Voters continue to frown on the job Congress is doing, but support for congressional incumbents has fallen to all-time lows….

      More disturbing for Congress members in an election year is that just 22% think their representative is the best person for the job and only 29% believe he or she deserves reelection. Both are new lows….

      So “Throw the BUMS OUT” is now in the political wind and if decent fresh new faces run in 2014, the Banksters death grip on the US government might be weakened.

      On the topic of Banksters, I had a very interesting conversation with an attorney employed by a bank. I mentioned my mortgage fiasco saga and he said SUE! …SUE NOW! It seems right now the banks are running scared and the judicial is frowning heavily on their fraud, to the tune of millions and billions of dollars.

      Of Course none of that will ever make it into the MSM so more people who were shafted can get a bit of Justice.

      • omanuel says:


        I admire your analysis, but I doubt Puppetmasters will ever recover and move on if now forced to address precise experimental data that show Neutron Repsion is the FORCEthat:

        1. Made our elements,
        2. Birthed the Solar System five billion years (5 Ga) ago,
        3. Sustained the origin and evolution of life after 3.5 ga ago,
        4. Destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, and
        5. Controls every atom, life and world in the Solar System today!

        • omanuel says:

          The volume of the solar system today – five billion years (5 Ga) after the Sun exploded – is greater than the volume of ten billion, billion Earth’s !

      • omanuel says:

        I.e., Gail, the Puppetmasters are also riding on the same ball of dirt with the rest of us, exactly 1 AU from a pulsar.

        They have control of what?

    • omanuel says:

      Hollywood and Christian extremists have joined the government’s new propaganda campaign to show that political leaders have total control of planet Earth and it’s bounty:

      What control?

  2. gator69 says:

    Those newspaper clippings are just old rotten articles, and won’t be around next year.

    • Gail Combs says:

      That’s true. They are already being used to line bird, puppy, lamb and kid cages… and boy do they stink! I have used them for all those applications. A face mask is recommended for disposal.

  3. Jaime Jessop says:

    You must be a conspiracy theorist to want to present these facts. Who but someone suffering from a serious case of conspiracist ideation would show actual emails from climate scientists discussing the need to remove 1930s/40s warming then demonstrate graphically that this has now been done very effectively? Have you even bothered to look at the many half-baked ‘scientific’ excuses for these adjustments published in the peer-reviewed literature? You did? But you laughed derisorily. There, you see, you ARE a conspiracy theorist.

  4. D. Self says:

    AGW scammer’s creed. “We can’t let the truth get in the way of progress”

  5. 2 degrees of data tampering to show 2 degree of warming. 100 percent of global warming is Mann-made.

    • Jon says:

      “They haven’t tampered with the Arctic Data, they just “helped” it become more political UNFCCC correct?”

  6. Jon says:

    The original rural data from Arctic, not influenced by UHI, also raised the question. If the 1930s are the warmest in Arctic, how can today’s global temperature be so much warmer than in was in the 1930s and at the same time Arctic is colder today than it was in the 1930s? Something is wrong with the data?

  7. Reblogged this on Right Wing Nuts and Bolts and commented:
    Not to beat the dead horse of global warming hoax, but to let people know that greedy people stop at nothing when it comes to perpetuating the money train.

  8. habilus says:

    How did you access the original graphs? Are they archived somewhere? I have the “before and after” graphs of Godthab-Nuuk showing the same fraudlent adjustments. I’d like to complete my gallery of arctic circle adjustments.

  9. Ian George says:

    Yes they are archived and have been for a few years.
    Here are the original and adjusted data graphs for Reykjavik.

    (Clue: check the web address).

  10. R James says:

    This has become a fairly standard procedure within climate science. If the real data doesn’t match the hypothesis, just change the “real” data until it does.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s