“It’s The Corruption, Stupid”

ScreenHunter_15 May. 13 10.50

Son of U.S. Vice President Biden Joins Ukraine Gas Company | Business | The Moscow Times

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

43 Responses to “It’s The Corruption, Stupid”

  1. Andy DC says:

    Is that clown actually going to run for President?

  2. BobW in NC says:

    Mike McCurry has apparently given reasons why Hillary won’t run on Real Clear Politics (Changing Lanes video). So – BIDEN FOR {RESIDENT!

    Oh, wait…

  3. Mike D says:

    They wanted military help and they get Joe Biden’s youngest appointed to be on the board of an energy company. I’m sure they’re overjoyed with such a well crafted response to Russia’s actions. It’s old world feudalism. I give you my child as proof that I’ll back you up if things get bad, except he can resign from the board at the drop of a hat, and I’m sure he’s not moving there.

    Amazing they could turn an incident like this into financial gain for themselves, while taxpayers pay for all the trips, like Biden’s trip over there last month or the month before.

    Off topic, but couldn’t he have joined the board of a Ukranian wind or solar company? Or is outrage reserved for western energy companies?

  4. So, when the Russians actually invade & “Hunter” Biden gets strung up, will Slow Joe blame it on Republicans or a drunk driver?

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Hunter Biden will never get strung up. He’s got a double-barrel shotgun. When the Russians invade, he will go up on the balcony, fire two blasts outside the house and they will all run away. His father promised him that.

  5. _Jim says:

    So, if we go to war over there, will the democrats declare it is for the (natural) gas – or no?

  6. phodges says:

    Mike you have cause and effect backwards. War is a racket.

  7. _Jim says:

    Russia’s history as seen in one sitting and ‘printed’ on one page:

    – – – – – – –
    Russian History Is on Our Side: Putin Will Surely Screw Himself

    So the international sanctions aren’t working—don’t worry! If 1,000 years of Russian screw-ups are anything to go by, it won’t be long before Vladimir Putin brings himself down.

    Now that we’ve failed to use Russia’s corrupt and degenerating economy, subservience to the international banking system, and vulnerability to falling energy prices to pop Vladimir Putin like a zit, we’re going to have sit on our NATO, E.U., and OSCE duffs and take the long view of Russian imperialism.

    Fortunately the long view, while a desolate prospect, is also comforting in its way, if you aren’t a Russian.

    In the sixth century A.D. Russia was the middle of nowhere in the great Eurasian flat spot bounded by fuck-all on the north and east, barbarian hordes and the remains of the Byzantine Empire on the south, and the Dark Ages on the west.

    Wandering around in here, up and down the watershed of the Dnieper River from Novgorod (which hadn’t been built yet) to Kiev (ditto) were disorganized tribes of Slavic pastoral herdsmen herding whatever was available, pastorally. They were harried by Goths, Huns, Khazars, and other people who had the name and nature of outlaw motorcycle gangs long before the motorcycle was invented.

    The original Russian state, “Old Russia,” was established at Novgorod in A.D. 862 by marauding Vikings. They’d set off to discover Iceland, Greenland, and America, took a wrong turn, and wound up with their dragon boat stuck on a mud bar in the Dnieper. (Historians have their own theories, involving trade and colonization, but this sounds more likely.)

    The first ruler of Old Russia was the Viking Prince Ryurik. Imagine being so disorganized that you need marauding Vikings to found your nation—them with their battle axes, crazed pillaging, riotous Meade Hall feasts, and horns on their helmets. (Actually, Vikings didn’t wear horns on their helmets—but they would have if they’d thought of it, just like they would have worn meade helmets if they’d thought of it.) Some government it must have been.

    Viking Prince Ryurik: “Yah, let’s build Novgorod!”

    Viking Chieftain Sven: “Yah, so we can burn it down and loot!”

    That’s pretty much it for Russia’s Golden Age. After the 18th century, Russia devoted itself mostly to being big fat loserland.
    The Russians weren’t converted to Christianity until A.D. 988—a thousand years late to “Peace be unto you” party, the basic principles of which still haven’t sunk in. (And maybe never had a chance to. Russia’s conversion came at the hands of St. Vladimir, Grand Prince of Kiev, who was reputed to maintain a harem of 800 concubines.)

    The death of St. Vladimir, and every other ruler of Old Russia, was followed by assassinations, mayhem, civil strife, and the other hallmarks of change in Russian leadership evident to the present day. Oxford historian Ronald Hingley notes that “the first and only Russian ruler to fashion an effective law of succession” was Tsar Paul I (1796-1801). Tsar Paul was assassinated.

    Anyway, things went along pretty well for almost 400 years. (Pretty well by Russian standards—a free peasant was known as a smerd, meaning “stinker.”) Then, in 1237, when the rest of the West was having a High Middle Ages and getting fecund for cultural rebirth, a Tatar horde invaded Russia.

    The Tatars were part of the Mongol Empire founded by Genghis Khan. They had a two-pronged invasion strategy: Kill everybody and steal everything.

    Kiev, Moscow, and most of Russia’s towns were obliterated. Tatar control—part occupation and part suzerainty over impotent, tribute-paying Russian principalities—lasted more than 200 years.

    The Russians have heroic stories about fighting off the Tatars, but in fact it seems like the Tatars gradually lost interest in the place and went off in a horde back to where they came from.

    Professor Hingley says the “Tatar Yoke” left Russia with “a model of extreme authoritarian rule combined with control through terror.” It also left Russia with a model of leadership best summarized by a passage from John Keegan’s A History of Warfare:

    “Genghis Khan, questioning his Mongol comrades-in-arms about life’s sweetest pleasure and being told it lay in falconry, replied, ‘You are mistaken. Man’s greatest good fortune is to chase and defeat his enemy, seize his total possessions, leave his married women weeping and wailing, ride his gelding [and] use the bodies of his women as a nightshirt and support.’”

    Why Putin wants Angela Merkel for a nightshirt is beyond me. But that’s a Russian dictator for you.

    Around the time Europe was getting a New World, Russia was getting tsars. Several were named Ivan, one more terrible than the next until we arrive at Ivan the Terrible in 1533.

    Ivan created a private force of five or six thousand thugs, the oprichnina, who wore black, rode black horses, and carried, as emblems of authority, a dog’s head and a broom. (The hammer and sickle of the day, presumably.)

    Oprichniks were entitled to rob and kill anyone, and did so with a will. Ivan suspected Novgorod of disloyalty, and the oprichnina spent five weeks in the city slaughtering thousands and driving thousands more into exile.

    Ivan presided over and sometimes personally performed the roasting, dismembering, and boiling alive of enemies and people who, left unboiled, might possibly become enemies.

    He killed his own son and heir by whacking him over the head with the monarchal staff in a tsar-ish fit of temper.

    He conducted a 24-year-long war against Sweden, Poland, Lithuania, and the Teutonic Knights, and lost.

    Russia’s economy was destroyed. Drought, famine, and plague beset the country.

    But Ivan put Russia on the map as an international player. He defeated what was left of the Tatars, mostly by conniving with leaders of what was left of the Tatars. He expanded Russian rule into Siberia, his success due to almost nobody being there. And, draw what parallels you will, Ivan the Terrible’s popularity rating was very high among the smerds.

    After his reign, Russia, if you can believe it, got worse. “The Time of Troubles” featured more drought, more famine, more plague, foreign invasions, massacres, the occupation and sacking of Moscow, and tsars with names like False Dmitry I and False Dmitry II. The population of Russia may have been reduced by as much as one-third.

    The remaining two-thirds reacted to increasing anarchy in traditional Russian fashion, by increasing autocracy. The Russians aren’t stupid. We’re talking about a country where chess is a spectator sport. Autocracy is just a Russian bad habit, like smoking three packs of cigarettes a day and drinking a liter of vodka.

    In 1613 the Romanov dynasty was installed, providing Russia with a range of talents from “Great” (Peter I, Catherine II) to “Late” (Ivan VI, Peter III, and Paul I killed in palace intrigues; Alexander II blown to bits by a terrorist bomb, and Nicholas II murdered with his family by the Bolsheviks).

    The Romanovs adhered to what Harvard historian Richard Pipes calls a “patrimonial” doctrine, meaning they owned Russia the way we own our house (except to hell with the mortgage). They owned everything. And everybody. The Romanov tsars imposed rigid serfdom just as that woeful institution was fading almost everywhere else.

    Russia never had a Renaissance, a Protestant Reformation, an Enlightenment, or much of an Industrial Revolution until the Soviet Union. Soviet industrialization produced such benefits to humanity as concrete worker housing built without level or plumb bob, the AK-47, MiG fighter jets, and proliferating nukes. (Although the only people the Soviets ever killed with a nuclear device was themselves at Chernobyl, located, perhaps not coincidentally, in what’s now Ukraine, for the time being at least.)

    Russia was out in the sticks of civilization, in a trailer park without knowledge of how to build a trailer. But Russia kept getting bigger, mostly by killing, oppressing, and annoying Russians.

    Peter the Great (1682-1725) led a military expedition against the Turkish fort of Azov that was a disaster. But Peter came right back and, getting more Russians killed, overwhelmed the Turks. The same thing happened in the Northern War against Sweden. Although it took 21 years after Peter ran away at the battle of Narva, Russia finally got a Baltic coastline. Which Peter didn’t know what to do with, so he built St. Petersburg in a swamp with conscripted serf labor. The number of Russian serfs who died building things in the swamp equaled the number Russian soldiers who died in the Northern War.

    Peter the Great raised taxes, made the Russian nobles shave their beards, and caused the death of his recalcitrant son and heir, like Ivan the Terrible did, but on purpose.

    Catherine the Great (1762-1796) doubled taxes on the Jews and declared they weren’t Russians, as if anyone would want to be. She was the first but not last leader of Russia to annex Crimea. NATO member alert, code red—she won two wars against Turkey and partitioned Poland. (Like Peter the Great on the Baltic, she got the swampy part.)

    Under Catherine, Russian settlements pushed all the way east into Alaska, the most valuable land Russia has occupied. (Annual GDP per capita, Alaska: $61,156. Annual GDP per capita, Russia: $14,037.) But—E.U. shame alert—when Russia was facing financial difficulties and geopolitical conflict, Tsar Alexander II was forced to sell Alaska to the United States in 1867 for 2 cents an acre. Later, as mentioned, Alexander got blown to bits.

    And that’s pretty much it for Russia’s Golden Age. After the 18th century, Russia devoted itself mostly to being big fat loserland, losing pace with the modern world, wars, Alaska, a communist utopia, a million victims of Stalin’s purges, 6 million victims of the famine of 1921, 8 million victims of the famine of 1932-33, a “Kitchen Debate” between Nikita Khrushchev and Richard Nixon, ICBMs in Cuba, the space race, the arms race, the Cold War, and finally, 14 independent countries that were once in the USSR.

    Napoleon actually won the war part of his war with Russia. If “General Winter” and the general tendency of Moscow to be periodically destroyed hadn’t, for once, sided with the Russian people, you’d be able to get a good bottle of Côte de Volga and a baguette in Smolensk today.

    Russia began a series of wars in the Caucasus that it has yet to win.

    In 1825, the Decembrists, a reform-minded group of military officers, staged a demonstration in favor of constitutional monarchy and were hanged for taking the trouble.

    Political oppression, censorship, spying, and secret police activity reached such a level of crime and punishment that Dostoyevsky himself was sentenced to death for belonging to a discussion group. He was standing in front of the firing squad when his sentence was commuted to exile in Siberia. (Whether to thank Tsar Nicolas I depends upon how weighty a summer reading list you’ve been given.)

    “Exiled to Siberia” says everything about Russian economic and social development in that land of mountains, lakes, and forests with a climate, in its lower latitudes, no worse than the rest of Russia’s. I’ve been across it on the Trans-Siberian Railroad. If this were America, the route from Irkutsk to Vladivostok would be lined with vacation homes and trendy shops, and “exiled to Siberia” would be translated as “exiled to Aspen.”

    Russia lost the 1853-56 Crimean War. NATO member alert, code green—Russia lost to Britain, France, and Turkey.

    In 1861 Tsar Alexander II freed 50 million serfs. If “freed” is the word that’s wanted. The serfs had no place to go except the land they were already farming, and if they wanted any of that, they had to buy it with the nothing they made as serfs. Later, as mentioned twice already, Alexander got blown to bits.

    Russia lost the Jews. Being robbed, beaten, and killed in pogroms was not a sufficient incentive to stay. More than a million Jews emigrated, taking what common sense the country had with them.

    Russia lost the 1904-05 Russo-Japanese War in the best Russian loser fashion at the naval battle of Tsushima.

    Japanese Admiral Togo Heihachiro “crossed the T” of the Russian fleet, a rare execution of a tactic where you get your ships in a horizontal line so that your guns can be aimed at the enemy, whose ships are in a vertical line so that their guns can’t be aimed at you.

    The Russian fleet was demolished. Eight battleships and most of the smaller ships were sunk. More than 5,000 Russian sailors died. Just three of 38 Russian vessels escaped to Vladivostok.

    Russia lost World War I, not an easy thing to do when you’re on the winning side. After the October 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, Russia was too much of a mess to keep fighting Germany. The Soviet government signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk surrendering Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Russian Poland, and Ukraine—containing in total a quarter of the population of Imperial Russia—to the Central Powers just eight months before the Central Powers had to surrender to everybody.

    Russia lost both sides of the 1917-22 Russian Civil War. The White Russians were losers. The Reds were total losers. We know how their revolution turned out.

    Russia might as well have lost World War II. Between 18 million and 24 million Russians died. That’s three times as many military and civilian casualties as Germany suffered. There must have been a better way to kill a bunch of Nazis running low on food and ammunition and stuck in frozen mud.

    Now, because of what he’s doing in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin has a higher smerd popularity rating than Ivan the Terrible or even Stalin. We certainly should have screwed him over. But Russian history is on our side. He’ll certainly screw himself.

    – – – – – – – –

    I found the foregoing to at least be humorous if not close to being accurate; those with a better short-story on Russian history feel free to add to, or correct any errors.


    • Anto says:

      That was a great read. Thanks for that.

    • José Tomás says:

      Actually, being a Russian Literature lover, I took the effort of reading it through.

      Fantastic, very well done and often hilarious 🙂

      Don’t be fooled, guys, it is long but well worth reading! 🙂

      • Gail Combs says:

        If I recall Robert Heinlien said much the same in one of his novels. (The Moon is a Harsh Mistress???)

    • gregole says:

      The first phony scare I figured out was the so-called population explosion. Ends up it’s mostly about demographics and poverty. Russia is the poster-child for poor population demographics. They are literally dieing out as a nation. Check it out – Google it. Their population is aging and they are not replacing themselves. There are cash bonus’ offered for couples to have kids. If this trend doesn’t reverse, Russia will be nothing but history.

    • Adam Gallon says:

      You missed a bit, on their way to explore the bottom of the Sea of Japan, they won a stunning victory against Britain’s finest trawlers, fishing in the North Sea.

  8. Fred from Canuckistan says:

    Looks like Bozo 1 standing between Dufus 1 and Dufus 2.

    • _Jim says:

      Those would make colorful, if not truthful ‘callsigns’ for their respective aircraft …


      • Ernest Bush says:

        I did find myself wondering why the bozo Senator from my state of Arizona was standing between those two in this story. Creeped me out a little.

  9. emsnews says:

    About the Vikings…um, the rulers of England were Normans who were originally Vikings who took over coastal France…now who is screwed up here?

  10. Justa Joe says:

    Remember how the libz loved to howl about Halliburton?

  11. Jimmy Haigh. says:

    So Biden’s son is joining Big Oil. And that’s OK?

    • _Jim says:

      Big gas; there’s a difference .. it may now be said that the younger Biden is following in the footsteps of the elder Biden in the notion, in the sense they are truly engaged or endeavoring in areas of like types, specifically, ‘gasbags*’ (in lineage and heritage) …


      * Per the Urban Dictionary: Gas bag = wind bag, pompous, talkative, bloviator. One who bloviates – constantly talking, often in a long-winded pompous manner. After the container holding the gas in a balloon or airship.


  12. Louis Hooffstetter says:

    Well, well, well… I’m still trying to figure out what the Democrats and RINOs had to gain from a war with Syria, but now we know why they helped overthrow the government of Ukraine and almost got us into a shooting war with Russia. This is Machiavellian.

    • B says:

      It’s part of the plan.

      • _Jim says:

        Is that General ‘Turncoat’ Weasley Clark? Well then, there you go …

        • Brian G Valentine says:

          Earned the Benedict Arnold Rhodium Plated Star for his “service” in leading paramilitary forces against his own countrymen in Texas

      • There Is No Substitute for Victory. says:

        Hold on a cotton picking minute, haven’t we already intervened in Iran back in 1953 when we and our English Cousins overthrew Mohammad Mosaddegh so that the Great British outlaw motorcycle gang could keep a little known oil company known then as British Petroleum?

  13. Brian G Valentine says:

    None of this family have the vaguest of scientific education, from what I see.

    They are all mouthpieces and talkers and PR pretenders, the same crowd routinely and easily gullible to the “climate change” meme

  14. philjourdan says:

    Biden is just stupid enough to get us into WWIII.

  15. catweazle666 says:

    You know Cousins, with all due respect, you don’t half pick some prize tossers to run your country!

    Although to be fair, here in the UK we are not entirely blameless, of course…

    • At least in a hereditary system you have natural selection. Over here, an utter idiot dying without issue only opens the door to bigger & better idiots.

    • philjourdan says:

      Unfortunately Groucho Marx and Mark Twain come to mind. Groucho for his line about “I would not want to belong to any club that would have me as a member” (politics) and Mark Twain for his about “thieves and congressmen, but then I repeat myself”.

      No one of any integrity would want to run the gauntlet to win the presidency, and of course those who do have no integrity in the first place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s