Satellites Or Surface Data?

Climate scientists choose to use whatever data brings in funding.

With temperature, they use UHI contaminated tampered surface data – and ignore much more accurate satellite data which shows no warming.

With sea level, they use tampered satellite data – and ignore surface data which shows no change in trend.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Satellites Or Surface Data?

  1. Chillville says:

    Winter just isn’t letting go and I’m sure the MSM will report on it quite soon:
    http://www.ironbay.com./lower_harbor_web_cam.htm

  2. Organic Fool says:

    Award-Winning Former UN IPCC Scientist Dr. Lennart Bengtsson Dissents: ‘We cannot yet separate well enough the greenhouse effect from other climate influences’ – Declares climate models ‘more a matter of faith than a fact’

    Another Prominent Scientist Dissents! Fmr. NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock ‘Laughs’ at Global Warming – ‘Global warming is nonsense’ Top Prof. Declares

    http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/04/15/former-un-ipcc-lead-author-dr-lennart-bengtsson-dissents-we-cannot-yet-separate-well-enough-the-greenhouse-effect-from-other-climate-influences-declares-climate-models-more-a-matter-of-faith/

    • Gail Combs says:

      Looks like some of the rats noticed that Al Gore has already deserted the good ship “Green Energy” and decided to beat the rest out the door.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s