CNN/MSNBC Journalists Lack Access To Electronic Communications

We keep hearing breathless hysterical rants from journalists wondering what is wrong with climate deniers, why they don’t listen to the scientists

A simple way to find out would be to ask us, but they won’t do that because it would damage their agenda. Modern journalists are simply not permitted to do any actual journalism.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to CNN/MSNBC Journalists Lack Access To Electronic Communications

  1. Jeffk says:

    Only press releases nowadays. From pre-screened, agreeable agenda seekers.
    Sad times for the republic.

  2. gccross says:

    I have the Good Sense God gave me and look out my window and say thank you for the Wonderful Dynamic World I live on,so Which part of 4.5 billion years of Climate Change don’t you understand? <:o)

  3. With Obama and the Insane Left, the agenda is always campaign lies, and BLATANT ones at that, nothing more. It is all about retaining power by hoaxing a public, a disheartening portion of which are all too willing to drink the Kool-Aid and pronounce it superb. To protect Obama’s lack of any character whatsoever, his followers, particularly in the media, have had to denude themselves of any character they may have had. Third world tyranny, anyone?

  4. Colorado Wellington says:

    They should call Andy Revkin. He may have a list from the expert on Denialism, David Victor *). With that list in hand, a journalist could go to his boss and ask:

    “I’d like to call one shill, one skeptic and one hobbyist each for climate denial. Is it ok?”

    The boss would then look at her schedule and and say:

    “Nah, we already ran a shill this month. Wait till June.”

    That would be more orderly than the current journalistic anarchy.


    *) Aristotelian classification of Denialism by David Victor:

    There are three categories of Denialists: Shills, Skeptics, and Hobbyists.

  5. Andy DC says:

    It is all that Kock brother money that turned us away from science and turned us into oil industry shills. We wish!

  6. Hugh K says:

    “Modern journalists are simply not permitted to do any actual journalism.”
    Much like modern climate scientists are simply not permitted to do any actual science.

  7. gator69 says:

    Modern journalist? I thought they called them useful idiots.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Yes, but modern.

    • Gail Combs says:

      NAH, They are Willing Accomplices or in many cases out right KGB agents like Hemmingway (Argo) was.

      Covert Influence involves inserting a desired message (the payload) into the culture of an enemy. The origin and intent of the message is hidden by using an Agent of Influence. The Agent is usually a native of the enemy culture and has access to the targeted culture’s communications line. If the objective was to influence the American planning for the war strategy conference with the Soviet Union in Yalta, the KGB would seek an agent within the U.S. government who was involved in those talks. The agent of influence, ideally someone close to the planners, respected and knowledgeable, would be provided with the Soviet line. Whenever possible, the agent of influence would argue the Soviet line, as if it was his own. An agent of influence never reveals his true master, and sometimes is not even aware of his being manipulated. Some agents require a “fig-leaf,” an ostensible excuse for their actions. Even though they likely understand the reality of what they are doing, it is sometimes psychologically easier to deny the reality, and maintain independence from the case officer running them. A good case officer understands this, assesses his agent’s personality, and provides the agent with a fig-leaf if necessary.

    • I. Lou Minotti says:

      Hey Gator, here’s a modern satirist that does a much better job than modern journalists:

  8. Brian G Valentine says:

    “why they don’t listen to the scientists”

    Meaning some butt wiper who voted for Obama and who expects to get paid for supporting him. No thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s