One Thing Is Very Clear – Michael Oppenheimer Lied To The House Science Committee

Oppenheimer said : “one thing is very clear – the number of very hot days has increased.

What is very clear is that Oppenheimer makes bold claims that are patently false. The frequency of both 90 and 100 degree days in the US is way down from the 1930’s and the 1950’s.

1

1

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to One Thing Is Very Clear – Michael Oppenheimer Lied To The House Science Committee

  1. Tel says:

    You haven’t been out there using raw data again have you Steve? I’m sure you have been told enough times, that data sets must always be corrected. This is the process of applying adjustments until the data gives the correct answer.

    “I stand corrected!” said the thermometer.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      We are done with our chores, Mother. Can we go out and collect raw data?

      And Mother, can we go up to the NCAR parking lot and make fun of scientists? Please, Mother!

    • Gail Combs says:

      Last paragraph….

      …There is so much fraud in the warmist movement that a reckoning must be had, or else we will lose scientific progress, the very engine that has brought us our standard of living. Corruption left untouched multiplies.

      I very much agree with that statement.

      With 1/4 of UK households living in ‘Fuel Poverty’ and 30,000 excess winter deaths a year, those responsible for this fraud should not walk away with their millions and billions intact to start another scam.

      • Tel says:

        …we will lose scientific progress, the very engine that has brought us our standard of living…

        I suppose you think that was just an accident?

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          Them’s fighting words.

        • Tel says:

          I don’t go picking fights. I will stand in defence of what I believe in, but violence is a last resort when all other options have been fully explored. Neville Chamberlain was right.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Heck NO!

          Straight from Obummer’s Science Czar and his buddies

          “A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation.” —Dr. Paul Ehrlich, Anne Ehrlich, and Dr. John Holdren, Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, 1970, p. 323

          “Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.” —Dr. Paul Ehrlich, Anne Ehrlich, and Dr. John Holdren, Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, 1970, p. 323

          (Note how the USA started down the tubes ~ 1970.)

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          Wise choice. Neville would not take on Gail either.

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          … and here she is, Tel. Before I managed to hit the “post” button. You are on your own.

      • Andy Oz says:

        Next scam – world killing ASTEROID!!
        The whole world will need to pay an Asteroid tax to pay for NASA to send a team of drillers and nuclear warheads up there to blow it up. Who would deny paying that tax!!
        Reminds me of some movie………. Nah. Must have been a dud.

    • Tel says:

      But, they had no other option except making up answers, because they already got rid of all the people who knew how to find the real answer.

      http://joannenova.com.au/2009/09/exile-for-non-believers/

    • Looks like the lie is beginning to unravel. the pajama boy says the science is settled. (only in his own mind which I suspect has been profoundly damaged by too much “blow”).

  2. Jeffk says:

    This reminds me of courtroom expert testimonials, which nobody questions the existence of. Two sides on a court case, each paying “experts” to slant the evidence in a way favorable to their side. But nobody calls the other side “deniers!” We fully understand why the experts leave out half the evidence: they’re paid to.

  3. D. Self says:

    Liberal and Liar are synonymous.

    • Morgan says:

      It’s so much easier to argue on the side of truth that to argue on the side of “What kind of shit do I have to make up to sound true.”

  4. Hugh K says:

    This is interesting but sadly data is not the libs thingy. The burning question to Joe Kennedy III and fellow alarmist travelers is; Does Opie look both ways before crossing the street? Then there’s that all important seat-belt qualifier. On with the shoooeeewwww…..

  5. geran says:

    M. the Open, is M the closed. (use your imagination). He/she will not debate on neutral ground. He/she will not respond in writing.

    Need I say more?

  6. Andy DC says:

    When it comes to alarmist lies, you don’t know where to begin and there certainly is no end.

  7. Andy Oz says:

    Australia’s chief scientist is also full of crap.
    http://m.smh.com.au/national/our-science-suffers-from-a-national-delusion-20140530-399l3.html
    We sank billions of taxpayer money into fraudulent alternative energy investment schemes when Juliar Gillard was PM. Now that the conservative government is cutting back to pay down the $400 billion in govt debt created by Gillard, we have the odd bleeding heart whining about a few people losing their government funded jobs. No one cares when we lose private enterprise jobs.
    If SCIENCE is so important, private industry and private investment will support it financially. Sucking money at the taxpayers expense is disingenuous, lazy and for some programmes, outright fraud.

  8. tom0mason says:

    Correction!
    What Oppenheimer actually said : “one thing is very clear – the number of very hot daze has increased.“
    He was of course refering to his turn on the bong.

  9. As I’ve said elsewhere, the jig is up on the “global warming” hoax. The Exile for non-believers « JoNova (link given in an earlier comment) lays out in exquisite detail how a top tier polar bear researcher was denied an invite to the PBSG meeting in Copenhagen because of his view on the science of Global Warming by a Calgary based scientist named Derocher. First, Derocher said we take our lead from the IPCC on Global Warming, saying we’re not experts and then the same group makes a statement on global warming. This is appalling behavior to say the least.

  10. Dmh says:

    He should have said:
    “one thing is very clear according to the latest data from GISS – the number of very hot days has increased.“,
    at least he would be showing where the lies come from.

    • rogerknights says:

      Aha! So he was speaking about Global temperatures, not US ones. I’m glad that’s clarified. Now what I’d like to know is, where does GISS say this? (We don’t want to accuse Oppenheimer unjustly–it would make us look bad.)

      • rogerknights says:

        One thing that’s not clear, besides where GISS made this 18% claim, is what period of time this increase from 10% occurred over. If it was 40 years, since 1976, then it’s reasonable, maybe. The impression I got, though, from context about the Pause, was that Oppenheimer was implying that this rise had occurred during the Pause–which seems implausible.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s