CO2 has increased by 10% over the last 18 years, with no warming. This complete lack of correlation has convinced climate experts that CO2 is even more dangerous than they previously believed.
Allowable carbon emissions lowered by multiple climate targets : Nature : Nature Publishing Group
These are the official statements… Why do I have thisgrin on my face? http://www.avaaz.org/en/avaazers_meet_ed_davey_2/?bLwbqbb&v=40367
Come on Steven … get with the program … the heat is hiding in the ocean and when it comes out it will make Godzilla look like Barney 😉
The Climastrologists are getting very very worried.
1. They KNOW the climate is cyclical.
2. They KNOW the climate has been cooling (After all they have been the ones tasked with hiding that nasty little fact.)
3. They KNOW that time is running out!
Nopenhagen was supposed to be the culmination of the United Nations grand plans for world dominance. Given the weather is cyclical they could predict the earth was due for a cooling spell about now and planned to use it as “SEE we controlled the weather by removing your Access to Energy.” It is the oldest con-game in the Shaman’s Playbook. (predicting lunar and solar eclipses) However the Chinese trashed those plans and the Climastrologists have been scrambling to hold the scam together long enough to get at least part of the plan (the trashing of the US energy system) in place.
After all how can the USA be made into a third world country and Communist China and Russia allowed to take her place if we don’t deny her Access to Energy?
It’s a cult now, preaching to the choir of press release authors to manipulate taxpayers into paying more grants to the cult. That’s all.
I doubt it has convinced them of anything other than the need to exploit the crises before it passes.
It appears there are more and more “Lukers” now fully joining the skeptic side. The bad science (BS) about CO2 is out there, and easily understood. The fact that atmospheric CO2 has increased in the last 20 years, while temps have moderated, negates a climate “forcing”. Once folks understand that CO2 is NOT a source of heat energy, they begin to see thru the hoax. The science was never correct, it just took years to unravel all of the lies and confusion.
CO2 is very magical: before it caused runaway warming; now it has morphed into “weirding” the weather.
The only thing it is weirding is alarmists brains, making them forget that the weather has always been like this.
The EU says cutting US emissions is not enough. I think they want you to absorb CO2.
Does anyone even acknowledge the existence of China and India these days?
Why the RSS dataset?
all other global temperature datasets on WFT show warming, why did you cherry pick the RSS Dataset? why do you prefer it above the Spencer and Christy UAH Dataset?
It has actually increased by 39%, from 280 ppm to 390 ppm and 97% comes from nature, but it is still of no consequence in the atmosphere. The facts are:
CO2 is a “trace gas” in air, insignificant by definition. It absorbs 1/7th as much IR, heat energy, from sunlight as water vapor which has 188 times as many molecules capturing 1200 times as much heat making 99.9% of all “global warming.” CO2 does only 0.1% of it. For this we should destroy our economy?
The Medieval Warming from 800 AD to 1300 AD that Micheal Mann erased to make his “hockey stick” was several degrees warmer than anything “global warmers” fear. It was the longest recorded time, 500 years, of peace with great abundance for all.
The Vostock Ice Core data analysis show CO2 increases follow temperature increases by 800 years 19 times in 450,000 years. That makes temperature change cause and CO2 change effect; not the other way around. This alone refutes the anthropogenic global warming concept.
Carbon combustion generates 80% of our energy. Control and taxing of carbon would give the elected ruling class more power and money than anything since the Magna Carta of 1215 AD.
Most scientists and science educators work for tax supported institutions eager to help government raise more money for them. And, they love being seen as “saving the planet.”
Google “Two Minute Conservative,” http://adrianvance.blogspot.com and you will be applauded at your next dinner party, barbecue or church picnic.
Why the RSS Dataset? what do you like better about the RSS data compared to the UAH Data?
It’s less contaminated.