Just How Bad Is The USHCN Data Tampering?

According to the USHCN V1 docs, they were done adjusting after 1990.

ts.ushcn_anom25_diffs_urb-raw_pg

ts.ushcn_anom25_diffs_urb-raw_pg.gif (650×502)

According to the V2 specs, they use the same TOBS algorithm as in V1. So it seems safe to assume that stations with no missing data after 1990 need no adjustments.

1990 was also the year when they started exponentially losing station data, and started doing a lot of infilling.

So I did an experiment. I calculated the post-1990 measured temperatures for all stations with no missing data, and the post 1990 temperatures for all of the fabricated data. The fake data is diverging from the real station data at a phenomenal 5.3 degrees per century.

ScreenHunter_693 Jun. 28 20.18

That huge spike in temperatures after 1990 which NCDC shows (and  I asked you to bookmark last night) is almost entirely due to fake data. Unbelievable.

ScreenHunter_680 Jun. 27 21.17

 

I’ve been talking about the discontinuity after 1990 for a long time, and there you have it.

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

58 Responses to Just How Bad Is The USHCN Data Tampering?

  1. omanuel says:

    Thank you for your courage! Your opponent is the “Wizard of Oz!”

  2. Gail Combs says:

    Others, Like E. M. Smith and Verity Jones have also looked at the problems with the temperature datasets too.

    This is an interesting graph by Verity Jones which shows why Krigging is a rotten method.

    It shows the increase and then decrease of data records (scale on left) by latitude.

    This graph, also by Verity shows the EXACT SAME PROBLEM Steve is showing only it is for the global records. The temperature shoots up as stations are dropped. Please note these are graphs from November 2009 and April 2010 and A.W. was certainly aware of them since that was were I found out about them in the first place.

    • omanuel says:

      Thanks, Gail, for the link to a discussion about data tampering on E.M. Smith’s blog on 6 Nov 2009, well before Climategate emails were released confirming data manipulation.

  3. Chuck says:

    So it begins Tony,

    http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/06/24/fox-news-cites-birther-to-claim-nasa-faked-glob/199871

    I gonna help this guy out. I’ll donate what I can.

  4. Brian G Valentine says:

    Jeepers .. I wonder if Tom Karl is aware of how much HCN is FAKED? I better write to him.

    He’s an EXPERT on FAKE

  5. RossP says:

    Gail
    Also remember that Phil Jones & co used the opposite tactic to produce HADCRUT4 (?) when they reintroduced stations located in Arctic regions to ensure the early 20th century temps went down and so make the climb in temps in the late 20th century and early 2000s look higher. They even adjusted the data on those stations and simply shrugged their shoulders when the Icelandic climatologists said these was no need for adjustments because they had already done so (ie. double adjustments on those stations).

  6. geran says:

    It is interesting that the more the “tampering”, the lower the current actual temps are.

    My air conditioners are not running. I hope they don’t lower the past anymore, or I might have to turn on the furnace…in the middle of summer….

  7. pyromancer76 says:

    Congratulations. You have worked long and hard and carefully. So glad the good science and proper use of data are being recognized. It is always a pleasure to read your blog, May you have many more years of success like this, Tony-Steve. The sharp wit is most welcome, too.

  8. Chewer says:

    The implications of all the fraudulent data published for the past many years makes my head spin.
    Will anyone within the data keepers realm attempt to reconcile these warmest months, those months in the top ten, the heat records made daily-weekly-monthly over the past decade, or will they hope the video just goes away. You can bet the farm that many of the criminals are cooking up their newest attempt for cover!
    I also wonder how many culprits who are in dire need of jail time will actually feel remorse, and how many will shrug it off with angrily gritted teeth???
    The coming battles are certainly going to be most spectacular 😉

    • Ian W says:

      “Will anyone within the data keepers realm attempt to reconcile these warmest months, those months in the top ten, the heat records made daily-weekly-monthly over the past decade, or will they hope the video just goes away. You can bet the farm that many of the criminals are cooking up their newest attempt for cover!”
      ===============
      There are no heat records only temperature records. Atmospheric temperature is not a measure of atmospheric heat content. Use of temperature is yet another layer of the scam – they should be measuring heat content in kilojoules per kilogram. But they are climate ‘scientists’ so do not expect any real science from them; just figures the politicians can use and which justify more funding.

  9. Ben Vorlich says:

    Steve,
    In Paul Homewood’s investegations into this problem at Luling, as I understand it, he identified that an update for the site data (moving to paperless and using google earth locations) may have caused the use of fill in data. I first came across the phrase “paperless office” in the 1980’s although I suspect it is much older than that. SO it is possible that government organisations moved to paperless in the 1990s and kicked off this whole issue by screwing up their systems and not bothering to put it as it suited their purposes not to.

  10. Eric Simpson says:

    An excerpt of a comment on wuwt from Paul Homewood on the Kansas data:

    The analysis Anthony refers to for Kansas, has looked at mean temperatures at every USHCN station in Kansas for January 2013.

    The USHCN Final dataset has adjusted UPWARDS every single station, bar one, by an average of about 0.5C.

    This is in addition to cooling historic temperatures. E.g. temperatures for 1934 have been reduced by about half a degree as well.

    http://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2014/06/28/ushcn-adjustments-in-kansas/

    • Eric Simpson says:

      Also, my comment on that wuwt post:
      Joseph Bastardi says at 2:31 pm
      One thing that keeps getting clearer to me is the amount of time, treasure etc wasted on 1/100th of the GHG, .04% of the atmosphere which [CO2] has 1/1000th the heat capacity of the ocean and next to the affects of the sun, oceans and stochastic events probably can not be measured outside the noise, is a giant red herring
      — ——— ———— ————– ————— —————— ———
      Good points all around, but a huge point about the ocean. Plus, with logarithmic absorption it is postulated that CO2 has essentially zero effects after perhaps 50ppm. And the actual evidence on CO2 affecting temperature? Not good.

  11. Phil Jones says:

    One would think that MORE Temp Stations with MORE readings Globally would be added to more accurately measure temperature… yet… as has been pointed out right here.. The number of Stations has actually gone way down…

    Satellite data is out there … but it’s being ignored because it doesn’t support the confirmation bias… as has been shown right HERE..

    What a crock… Real measurements have been sooooooo corrupted that we may never know what the real warming, if any, there actually is…

  12. slimething says:

    Tony,
    Now that everyone is forced to look inside Pandora’s box, there is no telling how deep and wide this thing is going to be because I think it is the catalyst for others that will both confirm much of your observations and find new problems. Thanks for not backing down.

  13. I saved some TOBS adjusted temperatures for Alabama two years ago.

    Now guess what? The latest data has increased the 2011 numbers by 0.3F, and reduced 1934’s by another 0.3F, making an artificial warming of 0.6F.

    Raw numbers have not changed. How can they possibly justify such large changes?

    As far as I know, the original numbers are not archived anywhere either.

    http://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2014/06/29/more-news-on-ushcn-temperature-adjustments/

    • Chip Bennett says:

      A perfect example demonstrating why the temperature “record” is garbage, and why what the Religion of Climate Science is doing is not in any way scientific.

  14. Gregory says:

    Thanks to Anthony for admitting he was wrong on this. Well done sir.

    • geran says:

      “A day (or three) late and a dollar (or thousands) short” comes to mind.

      Also, “Jumping on the bandwagon”, and “going with the winner”.

      “Egg on his face”….

      • Willis Eschenbach says:

        geran says:
        June 30, 2014 at 12:10 am

        “A day (or three) late and a dollar (or thousands) short” comes to mind.

        Thanks, geran. Anthony admitted he was wrong as soon as he determined he was wrong. Unfortunately, that’s always at least later than we’d like.

        Seems like you want him to admit he was wrong a day early, that is to say, a day before he determined he was wrong …

        w.

        • There are issues here which go far beyond being technically right or wrong about temperature.

        • geran says:

          One person’s “admission” is another person’s “denial”. Anthony played the “bully on the playground”, only to get beat up. Now, he is trying to play the victim with the “why is everybody picking on me” cadence.

          Of course, you may not see it that way. But, you get to come to this blog and voice your opinion, as do I. However, many of us do not get to voice our opinions at WUWT.

          WUWT?

        • Latitude says:

          Willis, Anthony is still using the “goddard was wrong before, so he thought he was wrong again”……without even looking at it
          Anthony couldn’t even run the program, didn’t try to get someone else to run it…and jumped on trashing Goddard

          Based on that…from now on should we all trash Anthony all over the internet ….because Anthony has OBVIOUSLY been wrong before?

        • Willis Eschenbach says:

          stevengoddard says:
          June 30, 2014 at 4:43 pm

          There are issues here which go far beyond being technically right or wrong about temperature.

          Thanks, Steven. I do know that you have a history with Anthony, but I’m not sure that’s relevant to his apology. Near as I can tell, both of you guys have been wrong in the past, as have I … and we’re all likely to be wrong again in future. For me, when a man sincerely apologizes, I prefer to accept it whether it’s flawed or not, and regardless of our history—apologies, after all, are how we get past our history with someone.

          Latitude says:
          June 30, 2014 at 5:17 pm

          Willis, Anthony is still using the “goddard was wrong before, so he thought he was wrong again”……without even looking at it
          Anthony couldn’t even run the program, didn’t try to get someone else to run it…and jumped on trashing Goddard

          Based on that…from now on should we all trash Anthony all over the internet ….because Anthony has OBVIOUSLY been wrong before?

          Anthony specifically said that it was a big error to assume that Steven was wrong this time simply because he’d been wrong before … and now you claim that we should make the exact same big error with Anthony. How does that work?

          Latitude, I’ve been through this kind of thing myself. Even when I have apologized repeated times, in great detail, there are always people who find fault with my apology. They don’t like my wording, or they don’t like my reasons, or like you, they think I shouldn’t have made the mistake in the first place … well, yeah, that’s why Anthony is is apologizing, because he did make the mistake.

          So your protest that he shouldn’t have done this and shouldn’t have done that misses the point—that’s what he’s apologizing for. You think he doesn’t know he screwed up? He’s told you he screwed up, he’s identified the mistake, but nooo, that’s not enough for the harpies, you claim he should never have made the mistake in the first place.

          He knows that, Latitude … I assure you, he knows that.

          As to whether that means we shouldn’t trust Anthony, actually it shows the opposite. It’s like the UAH MSU record. People say “But RSS found flaws in it, so we can’t trust it” … but it’s the opposite. I trust a man who acknowledges his mistakes and apologizes and corrects them, whether its the UAH guys or Anthony. That makes me more willing to trust them, not less willing.

          Best regards to all,

          w.

        • Latitude says:

          alright Willis stop the bullshit….neither one of us is stupid enough to think you didn’t get the point

        • Latitude says:

          and to quote you…don’t you dare put words in my mouth like you just did
          I didn’t say any such thing and you f’ing know it….

          quote me….

        • Willis Eschenbach says:

          Latitude says:
          June 30, 2014 at 10:20 pm

          alright Willis stop the bullshit….neither one of us is stupid enough to think you didn’t get the point

          I’m often amazed when I write something that I think is totally clear, and that my meaning is so obvious no one could miss it … but all too often, people either don’t get my meaning at all, or they understand my words in some totally different way that I never meant. Go figure …

          However, I’m not stupid enough to think it’s always the other guy’s fault.

          In fact, I thought I’d gotten your point. From what you say, clearly I didn’t get your point. That’s just the facts, nothing I can do about it.

          With that misunderstanding out of the way, what was your point that I obviously missed?

          Latitude says:
          June 30, 2014 at 10:22 pm

          and to quote you…don’t you dare put words in my mouth like you just did
          I didn’t say any such thing and you f’ing know it….

          quote me….

          I quoted in full exactly what I was responding to, Latitude, as is my usual habit. Was there something else that you would like me to quote?

          If so, please quote it, and explain how I was wrong about it so I can understand exactly what your objection is. The problem is that in your haste to accuse me of not quoting you … you didn’t quote me, so I have no idea what it is that has upset you.

          I ask for your clarification and a quotation of what I said that upset you because so far, I’m batting two for two at not getting your point, and I’d greatly prefer not to do it again.

          Much appreciated,

          w.

        • Latitude says:

          Don’t push your paranoid psychobabble off on me…..don’t label me a harpie
          Everything you just said is just the bullshit in your head.I made no such claims

  15. tallbloke says:

    Reblogged this on Tallbloke's Talkshop and commented:
    .
    .
    Ohhh dear. Steve Goddard has found a big divergence between real and ‘estimated’ data in GHCN ‘dataset’.

  16. tallbloke says:

    Oops. There goes the global warming…

  17. Brian D says:

    I have three years of Minneapolis/St Paul (USHCN 215435) data. Incredible data tampering. This station has been a midnight/hourly station all its life. No TOBS correction. If you want it, I have it together in an Excel package. If you blink the charts, the up and down nature these last three years is bad. You have to see this to believe it. Incredible!

    • Brian D says:

      Mpls raw avg – 45.3F trend 0.15F/dec
      2011 avg – 45.3F trend 0.22F/dec (cooler pre 1950, warmer till 2000, close after that)
      2012 avg – 44.5F trend 0.35F/dec (much cooler pre 1960, then up and down till early 80’s, close after that)
      2013 avg – 45.2F trend 0.23/dec (cooler pre 1940, then warmer till 1970, close after that)

      Crazy adjustments!

  18. tallbloke says:

    I would have thought more people would come over to thank Steve for his discoveries, rather than cleave to the site that dismissed them. Strange conformity.

    Well done Steve.

    • Latitude says:

      they’re having a hard time with being shown up…..by someone they consider beneath them

    • Willis Eschenbach says:

      Thanks, tallbloke. I’m here, and I’ve congratulated Steve warmly on his work. As to why other folks don’t come here, I couldn’t say, likely people have lots of different reasons. I’d note that when I’ve been shown to be right, I haven’t seen people flocking to my site from either here or from your site to congratulate me … but then I’m the guy folks love to hate, so I guess that makes sense.

      w.

  19. Chad Bergen says:

    What you need to do Willis is realize the days of the college dropouts who thought the whole scam was real

    have had your days of claiming you are correcting we, the real, working scientists, of the world, and that everybody else is so stupid.

    The two of you along with Mosher and the entire Warmist cabal of drunks, manic depressive street entertainers, college dropouts, and Academic funds frauds,

    have been shown and proven to have been utterly wrong from almost the first time you said you believed the temperatures were real, and that the warming was real, and that the Magic Gais story, was real.

    You and Watts and the other low-dollar hacks who have been systematically assassinating the character of we

    the real working scientists trying to correct you

    don’t have reputations to trash. That’s why it was always seeming so easy when Watts was outing every scientist he could and you were insulting people you didn’t know about things you

    obviously
    didn’t know.

    You’re a hick.
    So’s Watts.

    And the two of you have gutted the credibility of we the actual skeptics you systematically insulted and raged at like a drunk entertainer angry he cant play, at a bar.

    You owe the world not an apology but several years’ lost ground in scientific debate between you.

  20. Chad Bergen says:

    Because it’s definitely the drunk entertainer/media hacks/college dropouts

    who haven’t been realizing what the proper tune is. Don’t you forget that ever again.

    This isn’t a “We all make mistakes every day” moment.

    Well – it is for you and Watts,

    the story is out on the mistakes you’ve been shouting from house tops every day for years.

    You personally have been systematically promulgating the greatest scientific hoax in the history of man kind,

    spitting on the scientific community whose reputation you neither ever had nor will, and claiming you’d compare yours to – well, ours – any day of the week.

    Consider yourself having seen yourself the way we’ve all been seeing you, for the past eight or ten years.

  21. Chad Bergen says:

    You and Watts PERSONALLY, Eschenbach, are two of the revealed biggest THUGS and simply intellectually nearly ASLEEP HAYSEED LOSERS

    and ABUSERS of SCIENTISTS and our PROFESSIONAL REPUTATIONS in this entire scam.

    The two of you have acted like drunken teenage punks: no one could get the keys from, Watts asking us to all to take a poll

    so he could see if it would be in the best interest of everyone for him to set up a ‘skeptics acceptable education organization to publish official skeptic scientific blaH, blah blaH”

    Some hillbilly who couldn’t even see the light of day with the entire scientific world telling him DAY in, DAY out, for YEARS Eschenbach.

    For YEARS while you mocked the entire correct scientific community, referring to us as “fringers”.

    You’re a fringer Eschenbach, clearly. The deluded fringe part. Clearly.

    You two people owe the world more than apology you owe to go into deep mourning for what you have done to the people who have watched you assume OUR positions: working competent scientists flying the space age around your obviously befuddled heads –

    generating the next big push to try to tamp down the “dissent from the minority” –

    the working scientific world you two have spit on and insulted for years,

    you are not a part of, Eschenbach, you and Watts became unstoppable cancers

    With Watts’ slick media style and character assassination none of us with REAL reputations

    Eschenbach: REAL, or in other words, UNBLEMISHED ones – or much more so then obviously what little you two actually had –

    stood a chance what with you two BARKING and MOCKING at how we were too GUTLESS to face the LIGHT of DAY: two HUCKSTERS with a MEDIA OUTLET.

    You owe far more than some pretended posturing you two people need to think about just wtf you have done for the past MORE than five years.

    And no you still aren’t one of the guys who are always right.

    That remains for the working scientists and researchers

    who always were.

  22. Chad Bergen says:

    I saw you say to someone the other day “the reason I have credibility is because I always admit it when I’m wrong”

    You don’t HAVE credibility, Eschenbach, you have a friend with a media outlet who is a believer in a magic gas scam run by government employees, working as an inside hatchet man against AUTHENTIC

    scientifically lucid and

    understanding SKEPTICS

    systematically bringing ridicule to the entire real, skeptical scientific community

    by not being able to
    shut your obviously scientifically illiterate and, innumerate, mouth,
    and let someone else have their say, too.

    You need a very VERY deep introspection on just how big a dupe and willing attack dog for scientific fraud you

    and WATTS

    are

    have been

    and must almost assuredly remain.

    And that’s from the scientists who can count Eschenbach.

    The real skeptical scientists watching
    you
    and Watts

    pretending the entire scientific skeptic community

    accepts you into our ranks.

    You are hoax-billies unable to read thermometers properly.

    Character assassins
    foisting hoax
    ruining real scientist’s and just regular guys’ names publicly

    with offhand disregard.

    The both of you are fake snake-oil salesmen: peddling certainty everybody else was wrong,
    too stupid to be apprised the entire rest of the world has realized how badly you are wrong.

    If you want to belong to the respectable science crowd you had better stop being wrong before you even start Eschenbach;; you’re a street entertainer and a tough so you’ll try to act like being caught the way you and Watts have is somehow not

    CATASTROPHIC to YOUR CREDIBILITY as even belonging in the same ROOM with the REAL scientists who tried to get a hand on the discussion but you were too busy being smartasses and just plain acting evil.

    That Schmidt-Schmoozing hack hick, Watts’ day of reckoning,
    is arriving simultaneously to yours which is quite appropriate

    since the two of you have acted like the two stupid kneecappers you’ve proven to be, relative to the scientific community. You managed to get a lucky FOIA and he found some stations bad,

    and the rest has been the SYSTEMATIC ELIMINATION OF SKEPTICS FROM THE DEBATE as BRUTALLY and EFFICIENTLY as TWO GOOFY WANNABES could MAKE IT.

    I’ve got ZERO respect for you.
    I’ve got ZERO respect for Watts.

    I tell EVERYONE I SEE
    about the USED ELECTRIC CAR SALESMAN and COLLEGE DROPOUT
    and the
    BIPOLAR STREET ENTERTAINER

    who SYSTEMATICALLY WORKED as LEG BREAKERS for your WARMIST SCAM DADDIES

    who let you STAY RELEVANT because you were so GULLIBLE you DID their WORK of DESTROYING SCIENTIFIC DEBATE

    FOR them.

    Like I said stupid you never got me, my pop was a Federal Law Enforcement guy and I’m an Avionics, Instrumentation and Communications Engineer

    so I saw you two baboons coming six different ways.

    I just hope the rest of the scientific community makes you hold your hat in your hand while you apologize for your disgustingly violent and insulting speech to the REAL scientists

    trying to correct your ludicrous, vapid misconceptions.

  23. Willis Eschenbach says:

    Dang … he didn’t stop until he ran out of CAPITAL LETTERS …

    w.

    • _Jim says:

      … and by the looks of it, posting drunk can look so, disjointed too …

    • Chad Bergen says:

      I’m done spitting on you and by extension your fellow dropout wannabe, Watts.

      I looked you up and you possess two certificates in massage,
      and a degree in psychology, from 1975.

      Watts the electrical school dropout and you: the massage certificate holder

  24. Chad Bergen says:

    You’re still cracking wise, completely unashamed at the fact you’ve been caught so stupid you can’t even read thermometers, Eschenbach, after spending years trashing men’s reputations, raging like a manic mental patient at people for proving you wrong.

    And now I look you up and you’re a MASSAGE THERAPIST.

    http://www.desmogblog.com/node/6258 You’re both dedicated Magic Gais BuLievers, so they’re not lying about who you are, are they?

    Now I’m through kicking you just to hear gelled stupid pull off a boot. Resume your bipolar raging/simpering/posing as wise dipshit who can’t read a thermometer.

      • Chad Bergen says:

        You seem worried about the massage therapist’s feelings. Are you two somehow connected at the hip and you’d like to pipe up he’s the smartest massage therapist you know?

        You seem emotionally tied to the massage therapist’s feelings so I think you’re a fan of his and you don’t like seeing what people think of a fraud usurping debate in an entire field of endeavor because his COLLEGE DROPOUT FRIEND had a MEDIA OUTLET.

        Actually I figure you’re young, and just don’t know what the two of these leeches have been doing for the past five years.

        You’re already claiming what I’ve said’s more than you can comprehend.

        So we’re gonna dumb it down for you and when you figure out the following you try to go back and re-read, and grasp it all since what I say to dozens of highly educated and experienced professionals in not one but several fields, rarely misses.

        That MASSAGE THERAPIST was over here from his COLLEGE DROPOUT FRIEND’s PLACE

        After the COLLEGE DROPOUT and the MASSAGE THERAPIST GOT CAUGHT

        trying to DESTROY STEVEN GODDARD’S/Tony Heller’s NAME.

        THEY got CAUGHT.

        a COLLEGE DROPOUT
        and MASSAGE THERAPIST

        Got CAUGHT trying to BULLDOZE the CREDIBILITY of a MAN

        when THEY GOT PROVED INCAPABLE of EVEN READING THERMOMETERS.

        * * *GLOBAL WARMERS TO THE CORE* * *

        THE TWO of THEM have OPERATED A WRECKING BALL OPERATION THROUGHOUT

        THE SKEPTICAL SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY FOR MORE THAN FIVE YEARS,

        VICIOUSLY INSULTING, HARASSING SCIENTISTS, DOING ALL THEY COULD TO INTIMIDATE, BAIT and SIMPLY MAKE PEOPLE TOO DISGUSTED WITH THEM

        to CONTINUE to TRY to SHED some LIGHT on their RAPIDLY-BEING-DESTROYED

        PSEUDO-SCIENCE MOVEMENT.

  25. Slartibartfarst says:

    Just a question: I wondered whether the whole issue of potentially fraudulent data manipulation in these data sources would be something that the GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office) is likely to get around to auditing. I’m not an American, but I’ve read that the GAO do some good work and I’ve used some of their excellent online library material and reports.

  26. Chad Bergen says:

    There’s only one reason I can think of for you to be here acting like you don’t think the discovery of a pair of college dropouts – well

    a college dropout and psychologist –

    who believe DEEPLY in GLOBAL WARMING

    RUNNING A WRECKING BALL OPERATION DESTROYING
    the REAL SCIENTISTS, reputations. is an upsetting thing.

    Well actually there are in fact several possible ones but judging by the tone of your pique

    I figure you came here to try to stick up for this repugnant insect

    and SCIENTIFIC WRECKING BALL trying to SAVE HIS REPUTATION being caught

    UNABLE to READ THERMOMETERS

    after having spent some SIX YEARS DESTROYING EVERYONE in SIGHT

    with his DEGREE in PSYCHOLOGY and MASSAGE THERAPIST CERTIFICATE.

    I’m putting it in big bold letters because I plan for him and Watts to remember my tone and utterly unafraid aspect because I watched those to kneepad warriors for FAKE SCIENCE

    take DELIGHT in SWINGING A SCIENTIFIC REPUTATION WRECKING BALL W.O.R.L.D. WIDE.

    So whatever your opinion about how it all just seems a little too much,

    you’d be right about that, it all does seem a little too much.

    UNTIL YOU REALIZE EVERY SINGLE SYMBOL, SYLLABLE, WORD and CONCEPT are TRUE.

    • Chad Bergen says:

      Oh that’s right I didn’t check it for grammar because I don’t care about your, or anyone else’s fascination with it here;

      So that last sentence should be

      UNTIL YOU REALIZE IT’S TRUE.

  27. Chad Bergen says:

    Again:

    Anthony Watts and Willis Eschenbach

    an electrical studies college dropout/tv personality/radio personality AND A PSYCHOLOGIST

    TWO GLOBAL WARMERS

    Have been RUNNING

    a SYSTEMATIC WRECKING BALL THROUGH THE SKEPTICAL COMMUNITY

    DESTROYING MEN’S REPUTATIONS anywhere they could FIND THEM for REVEALING

    THE INNUMERABLE HOLES IN

    THE GREEN HOUSE GAS THEORY.

    It doesn’t matter if it’s put in LARGE type or NOT.

    It’s WHAT THEY ARE DOING NOW

    and HAVE BEEN DOING

    MORE than FIVE YEARS.

    =====================
    Complete with THE NOW LEGENDARY WORD LIST

    of THINGS YOU COULD NOT SAY about THE FRAUD including the word FRAUD, FRAUDULENT,

    Watts PUBLISHED the INITIAL LIST and it was several words not one or two.

    SAYING IT WAS NOT REAL SCIENCE WAS and is OFFICIALLY BANNED but people go do it anyway.

    WATTS’ HAS ONE SOLE REMARK now A LAUGHINGSTOCK IN HIS OWN FACE: “slayer junk.”

    I think that book was published like… I dunno how long ago, a LONG TIME and EVERYONE is “ASSOCIATED with THOSE SLAYERS and THAT SLAYER JUNK.”

    Who got slayed Watts?

    Who got proven to NOT BE ABLE TO READ THERMOMETERS, COLLEGE DROPOUT WATTS?

    This is WHY THERE ARE NO HIGHLY POPULARIZED SKEPTICAL BLOGS
    EXCEPT OTHER PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS’

    Because WATTS and ESCHENBACH
    the ELECTRICAL SCHOOL DROPOUT/tv/radio professional

    and the MASSAGE THERAPIST/PSYCHOLOGIST

    who run a MEDIA OUTLET
    DESIGNED TO WIPE OUT ANY SKEPTICAL SCIENTIFIC BLOGS

    WHICH REVEAL THEIR belief in PSEUDO-SCIENCE called “GREEN HOUSE GAS LAW”

    SYSTEMATICALLY DESTROY the REPUTATIONS an OUT any N.O N MEDIA PERSONS

    so THEY CAN UNLEASH MEDIA RIDICULE from GREEN HOUSE GAS BELIEVERS like THEM.

    This is NOT f***g COMPLICATED.

    And IT IS as EVIDENT as the NOSE on YOUR FACE.

    Somebody needs to write something about it and tweet/link what I am saying to everybody you know in the climate thiing and, people can clean it up and develop it further all they want

    IT IS AS EVIDENT as the NOSE on YOUR FACE

    And THEY AREN’T GOING to GO AWAY UNTIL EVERYONE DECIDES to SPREAD THIS NEWS

    and BOYCOTT ANYTHING ASSOCIATED with ESCHENBACH and WATTS.

    TRY keeping them around letting them come to your place and post, TO EXPAND THEIR BRAND
    and SEE if they STOP DESTROYING SCIENCE and SCIENTIST’S LIVES with their WRECKING

    MENTALITIES

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s