Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
Join 1,961 other subscribers
No More Spying On Citizens Who Aren’t Suspected Of A Crime
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Keep it coming! The world should be reminded about this snake oil salesman!
What a sad, sad state of affairs for society – not just here but worldwide.
Slow down as they say. Here’s some quotes:
“[Inaction will cause]… by the turn of the century , an ecological catastrophe which will witness devastation as complete, as irreversible as any nuclear holocaust.” -Mustafa Tolba, 1982, former Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Program
2000 passed. Didn’t happen. Lol. Or this:
“Entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.” -Noel Brown, ex UNEP Director, 1989
2000 passed. Didn’t happen. Lol. Or this:
“By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world.. will be in famine.” -Professor Peter Gunter, Earth Day 1970
2000 passed. Didn’t happen. Lol.
“Unless we announce disasters no one will listen.” -Sir John Houghton, first chairman of the IPCC
It seems that it is beginning to dawn on some of Europe’s mainstream media: the transition to green energies is turning out to be ten or even 100 times more expensive than expected.
1 euro costs, 3 cents benefit
First the nachrichten discusses what could be the most economically sensible way of reducing CO2 emissions. So far the measures that have been implemented have been both effective and ineffective: Effective at costing lots of money, ineffective at actually reducing CO2 emissions. The nachrichten writes that the most effective policy to reduce carbon emissions may be a CO2 tax, but Australia has just repealed it because of its sheer unpopularity. The Austrian nachrichten then writes about the astronomical costs and the utter ineffectivity of climate policy so far: Already the EU 2020 strategy costs 185 billion euros annually. By the end of the century the costs will run to 15 trillion euros. With this, according to the UN IPCC, the global temperature increase will be lowered 0.05°C. For every euro that the EU pays into climate protection, it prevents 3 cents worth of damage from climate change. Lomborg writes: ‘That is not rational policy!’”
Included in the article were points made by and a picture of Richard Tol, and a commenter said this: “Tol needs a comb. But we’ll take him as he is!” Lol.
Heh. Maybe some commenters here will follow suit and take Goddard as is.
Steve is just fine. I like his wit.
The Progressives insist that we must fight like ‘Gentleman’ while they are allowed no holds barred street fighting. It is about time someone pointed these things out and quit with the “nicey nicey we will keep it to nitpicking the science” in effective method.
But as _Jim said I am an ’emotional female’ and therefore will go for the eyes with the claws or the … with a knee if I find myself forced into a fight. Forget the “nicey nicey” it only prolongs the fight and gets you hurt.
If I was forced into a street fight I’d want you on my side.
you miss the point: he suspects ALL of us for one crime or another.
unless you’re white, of course, in which case he knows you’re already guilty.
Look, he wouldn’t be spying on you if you weren’t suspected of crimes. Just plead guilty & you’ll be treated with the same dignity that musselmanns treat each other.
Mark Stoval had a good essay on that: The state says you are a criminal
which was pretty much my point.
No, now they just shoot you – http://benswann.com/exclusive-leader-of-scout-troop-confronted-by-armed-border-patrol-speaks-out/
Funny how when Bush started doing it no Republicans objected. They supported it and shrugged it off with “I’ve got nothing to hide”
I am angry as anybody that Obama changed his tune once he got into office. At the same time, however, every president, regardless of party, makes promises they don’t keep. Most famous was HW Bush’s “Read my lips, no new taxes”. I never made much of that because the economy never stays the same and new solutions are needed to solve what problems arise. HW just should not have said it because it came back to haunt him. But then, he was running for election.
Funny how Obama cynically and intentionally lied about everything in order to get into office, and progressives are still too stupid to figure it out.
P, you get it wrong again. Bush One was NOT a conservative. He was a moderate. Moderates are in the “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” category.
Translation: They have no core values.
I always said, choosing Bush One for VEEP was one of the worst mistakes Reagan ever made. (Bush One set us up for the phony Clinton.)
Oh yeah, politicians can make mistakes, but Leftists always believe GOVERNMENT is infallible. Live and learn, or not.
I disagree. Poppy Bush was a conservative. Reagan was a conservative. Then over the next 10 or more years the Republican party shifted to radicalism. My father, a Republican all his life, would be horrified if he saw what happened to the party in the new millennium .
Ronald Reagan would be shocked to see today’s Republicans. Even though you raised him to exalted status he would probably disown you.
I wonder if you see the damage that radicalism in your party has cost you? It is unlikely we will see another Republican president for a long time. You can get only so far spewing hate against the president on the air, gerrymandering, obstructing voting and lying before the people want nothing to do with you. I think there will be some nasty surprises for you come November.
He77 no. GHW Bush was not conservative. He was a Progressive in the mold of Nelson Rockefeller. Look in the mirror, bub, if you want to see radicalism. The Progressives have that in spades and clubs.
You have confirmed my belief that your ability to infer political tendencies is nil.
Given your other prognostications, your “beliefs” have yet to be correct. So they can be ignored.
Bush 41 was never a conservative. He was always a NE Republican (think of Jumpin Jim Jeffords). I love how liberals tell us what Reagan would do and think when they vilified him during his life. And never learned what he was about. I guess you can sum up Reagan with one of his quotes: Government is not the solution to the problems, government IS the problem.
Until you understand that, you will always be wrong when you go outside of your talking points (and always wrong with your talking points).
I have zero use for Bush either.
You are making the mistake of thinking Bush and Obama are on opposite sides politically. They are not. They are BOTH FOR Global Government.
As those in the UK are finding out the UK is no longer a sovereign state but a vassal state of the EU and the citizens were never even aware of what was happening. Vernon Coleman: Was Britain taken into the EU illegally…
Pascal Lamy tapped for EU president and former Director-General of the World Trade Organization made it clear that ‘Global Governance’ and the removal of Sovereignty from nations has been the goal of world leaders since the 1930’s
So they Failed to find a clear reason for the peons to give up their rights. Enter Global Warming and Environmentalism:
Pascal Lamy holds up the EU, with its bureaucrats far removed from the control of the citizens as a template of ‘Global Governance’ Global Governance: Lessons from Europe: What can the world learn about global governance from the diplomatic model of the European Union?
Note that the EU started out as a “Trade Organization” just as the WTO has started out as a “Trade Organization” However The FDA during Bush’s Admin said:
The WTO and the OIE wanted US farmers regulated so guess what, despite the wishes of Americans we now have farmers regulated. Those regulations will cause the loss of most if not all independent farmers as similar regulations did in Europe. See The Battle to Save the Polish Countryside: Julian Rose exposes the scandal of EU’s deliberate policy to get rid of family farms for the benefit of the corporations and gives a personal account of his battle with the GMO dragon that threatens to devastate rural Poland
This leaves the Ag Cartel that formulated the WTO agreement on Ag in control of our food supply. The WTO and the Politics of GMO
I am not against the idea of GMOs, I just do not like Monsanto’s tactics and think genetic monoculture is an idiotic policy especially when combined with a Just-In-Time, no grain reserve policy.
I think we are in agreement on a number of issues you bring up in your post. What nonsense is this that makes anyone think we can force a common constitution on a world of different and sovereign nations? I was amused by the question “so who’s going to lead it?” Ha! Even Jesus would not apply for that position.(I mean that lightheartedly not offensively).
In clothing, ‘one size fits all’ usually means nobody’s going to be happy wearing it.
May I suggest you read E.M. Smith’s “Evil Socialism” vs “Evil Capitalism” It explains why the ordinary citizen always is the one to get shafted no matter who is in control of the US government.
A rather telling quote from Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto
HMMMmmm no wonder some scientists like the idea of Marxism and being “honored and looked up to with reverent awe.”
And another quote from Fabian Socialist George Bernard Shaw. He was Co-founder of the Fabian Society that set up the London School of Economics that trains world leaders in politics, commerce and finance like George Soros and David Rockefeller.
We also have the outlook of Stalin:
From the book Willing Accomplices: How KGB Covert Influence Agents Created Political Correctness and Destroyed America by Kent Clizbe
Stalin’s idea of attacking the ‘bourgeoisie’ aka the Middle Class is echoed by Maurice Strong, Chair of the First Earth Summit in 1972. Strong wrote the introduction to the book published by the Trilateral Commission, called Beyond Interdependence: The Meshing of the World’s Economy and the Earth’s Ecology by Jim MacNeil. (David Rockefeller wrote the foreword). Strong said this:
Strong echoed those words in the opening session of the Rio Conference (Earth Summit II) in 1992. He said that industrialized countries have:
Rosa Koire, a Liberal California bureaucrat outline the feudal villages planned for us:
What we are seeing is the return of a two class system of Aristos and serfs. The International Monetary Fund has even documented it.
This is not a natural distribution of wealth. Pareto 80/20 rule says 20% of the population controls 80% of the wealth. In 1906 an Italian economist, Vilfredo Pareto, discovered that 20% of the Italian population owned 80% of the nation’s wealth. Further studies revealed that The Pareto Principle, as it became known, affects us all in every aspect of life.
This article: 29 Statistics About Extreme Income Inequality In America That Will Blow Your Mind documents the concentration of wealth into the hands of a few. But beware
Senator Daniel Webster in a speech over the reauthorization of the Second National Bank of the U.S. in 1832, explained how the concentration of wealth is done:
I took me a while to get through your post but it was interesting. I am not a globalist nor a conformist so I am against this New World order nonsense.
I don’t know if you intended Rosa Koire to be an example of all that is evil with globalization but reading about her she is absolutely a raging critic against it. She conducts gatherings of people regardless of party identity and wants them to join in her baary stuffttle against UNAgenda21.
This is scary stuff and I hope all will take heed and realize if we don’t voice our opposition we’ll live, or our grandchildren will live to regret.
‘barry stuffttle’? I guess I meant her her battle ? to end it.
Still stuck on Republican=Conservative. I guess some people are incapable of learning.
And lying is wrong regardless. But at least SOME republicans do not stomach it from their leaders. Democrats cheer it on.
Another rube self-identifies.
Do not bash someone who has the brains to see they were lied to.
The major goal of our would be Masters is to keep us fighting with each other while they consolidate their power over all of us.
That’s sound in principle, Gail, but you may want to catch up on some of her other intellectual output:
I doubt you will find what you think could be there but what do I know? I’ve seen stranger transformations before, e.g. some notable “red diaper” Americans.
We can always hope.
Some like Richard Courtney and Rosa Koire have figured out there is a wolf hiding under all the wool.
And no more this sh!t:
Here’s a story involving the Dept of “Homeland Security.” DHS Raid Home To Seize Land Rover For Violation Of EPA Regulations. This is asset forfeiture, and not part of the drug war, but of unsuspecting people’s property, valued at $65,000! Utterly insane. Here’s a video from the above link:
The ‘Drug War’, dating back to the early 20th Century, made this possible. You know, to control ‘organized’ crime, which the Progressives created by criminalizing sale, use and possession of ‘drugs’, initially those favored by ‘the Other’ then taking on one of the most ancient of these, ethanol. When Alcohol Prohibition backfired, then they took on hemp derivatives. The rest is, as they say, history.