USHCN V1 Vs V2 Adjustments

USHCN raw monthly data (which is not really raw and already tampered) shows a long term cooling trend in the US.

ScreenHunter_1632 Aug. 03 12.00

The USHCN V1 adjustments just weren’t getting the job done, and weren’t able to keep up with the cooling trend

ScreenHunter_1605 Aug. 03 06.11

So they invented V2, with a spectacular hockey stick of adjustments – used to create the false impression that the US was warming.

ScreenHunter_1630 Aug. 03 11.46

The next graph shows both sets of adjustments on the same scale. It looks like someone forgot to double check their homework before they turned it in,  because V2 and V1 adjustments don’t even vaguely resemble each other. They are supposed to be almost the same the algorithms.  Close enough for government work though.

ScreenHunter_1629 Aug. 03 11.35

The next graph shows the impressive hockey stick of new data tampering they piled on to USHCN V2 – on top of the USHCN V1 tampering.

ScreenHunter_1628 Aug. 03 11.33

Climate experts say that this is all golden, and that I should shut up – because I just don’t know what I am talking about.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to USHCN V1 Vs V2 Adjustments

  1. Latitude says:

    I see all of global warming….is just adjustments

  2. catweazle666 says:

    Why do you think it’s called “Man Made Global Warming”, Steve?

    You’ll never make a “Climate Scientist” with your attitude, mate!

    • Phil Jones says:

      He’s mocking the supposed climate scientist Michael Mann….

      What attitude is one supposed to take cat? Clearly the outputs hate are quite different than the inputs… Why must one tamper with actual Temp readings in the first place? Seems the more assumptions and adjustments you put in… The more bias is introduced…. The further from the actuals we become… Rendering these Climate Change Models useless…

  3. I think I recognize the USHCN V2 curve. They switched to the Bernie Madoff Return on Investment calculator:

    The Bernie Madoff Calculator

    “Put in the investment amount, and calculate your hypothetical return, and it will tell you how long your money will last.”

    http://www.wallstreetmanna.com/2008/12/bernie-madoff-calculator.html?m=1

    Annual Rate of Return on Investment: BMROI Algorithm V2, 2008, Madoff, B.L.

    https://sites.google.com/site/annualrateofreturnoninves/bernard-l-madoff-investment-securities-inc-investment-securities-inc

  4. omanuel says:

    Climategate exposed a cancerous growth that had grown out-of-sight in federal research agencies since the end of WWII.

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Preprint_Solar_Energy.pdf

    You can help salvage the reputation of NASA, DOE, NSF, EPA etc by identifying flaws in the above manuscript.

  5. Latitude says:

    What I would like to see…is the monthly average temp….plotted as it would be without the adjustments

  6. Phil Jones says:

    As previously reported on here …. Let’s also not forget how the Alarmists are reducing the number of USHCN stations …. Seems the importance of the issue here would require MORE… Not less Temp Stations… More spread across the Globe…

    But I guess the 50lb heads at NASA know better… Removing the inconvenient stations which show no warming…

  7. darrylb says:

    Don’t know what you are talking about.—— The graphs are simply facts, period.
    Anthony at WUWT writes of the details of the homogenization, which results in the facts illustrated in the graphs. The alarmists cannot argue against there own figures.

  8. John McLachlan says:

    If I recall correctly, Michael Mann created his hockey stick by using tree-rings as a proxy for temperature, up until a supposed divergence between the growth of trees and the global temperature, whereupon tree growth was no longer a valid proxy and he utilized measured or adjusted temperatures.

    Was this divergence between the assumed measured proxy temperatures derived from tree-rings really from the modern temperature measurements, or was the divergence from the modern corrected temperatures?

    If the so-called divergence was a consequence of the falsification of the temperature record by substituting adjusted temperatures for the actual measured temperatures, perhaps tree-rings may retain whatever validity they once had, as proxies for temperature.

    Would a temperature record, derived from tree-rings, from the middle ages, until today realy generate the famous hockey stick?

  9. Gail Combs says:

    In Steve’s fourth graph, USHCN Adjustments (Final Minus Raw) with USHCN V1 in blue and USHCN V2 in red, note what they have actually done.

    The Version 1 graph started at zero and just added a few tenths of a degree while the second version actually cools the past but does not mess with the present as much.

    Then remember The GISS Temperature Record Divergence Problem: Divergence Between GISS and UAH since 1980 UAH is Dr Spencer’s satellite data, Univ Alabama @ Huntsville.

    Another post to make you smile: Shocker – CRU’s Jones: GISS is inferior

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s