In 1950, everyone knew about the massive warming in the Arctic
18 Feb 1952 – Melting Icecaps Mystery
06 May 1940 – Greenland’s Climate Becoming Milder
Even NASA/NOAA knew about it until a few years ago, when they decided to erase it.
GHCN V3 : Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
GHCN V2 : Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
In order to get rid of the 1940’s blip, NASA/NOAA cooled temperatures by more than 2C
NASA sent men to the moon with the most complicated piece of machinery known to man at the time. Now they are using a simple steam roller to flatten out the “inconvenient” facts.
And these climate crooks understand perfectly why the “blip” must go …. $$$$$$
http://youtu.be/Zofmae_7XtE
This was a local production of KPIX Channel 5 San Francisco during the Fifties. It aired Wednesdays at 7pm, I believe.
NASA is apparently not the same agency that I worked for during the Moon Landings. Yet in truth, some first-rate people are still trying to “do the right stuff!”
Space exploration is one thing. Great work on the Martian rovers and many other areas even if we now have to rely on the Russians to get our people up to the ISS. Those folks are judged on results. The GISS climate division is quite another thing altogether. They are judged by if the tow the party line.
I see it as there are really TWO NASAs. One is the group of engineers and real scientists that have contributed to huge successes such as the Moon landings and Mars exploration. The other group is purely political, and their false science is harmful to mankind.
If we can ever get perversion and corruption out of government again, the “negative” NASA can be defunded. And that means more funding for the folks that actually PRODUCE.
Yep one group has it’s judgments and theories validated or falsified by the performance of the vehicles and equipment. The other has virtually no controls that allow them to be falsified generally. They have take a conglomeration of data and information from hard sciences and alter their data to produce the results they desire. In short the people doing the work in space are at the cutting edge of engineering and hard sciences. NASA GISS Climate Studies Div is a perfect example of what is wrong with soft “science”.
What’s with the missing data in GHCNv3 in 1926 and 1946? Did GISS have it in v2 and lose it for v3? there are 54 missing values in v3 and only 6 in v2.
Good question… I’d like to hear how the NASA folks would respond… but alas… they never will… currently there is no political will to call these guys out… The Climate Change mantra is in full force… social policy is being crafted and enacted across the Globe based on this inexact Science… These lies…
Arrogant Scientists, Advocacy Groups and Politicians have an agenda… The truth undermines that agenda so folks must hush up or be ostracised… lose their living… good people just get bullied and go along.
It could be another decade before it becomes just so obvious that Global Warming is a Hoax… but crafty Progressives are already winning that chess game by constantly publishing bogus studies and FEAR Articles… plus wordsmithing. . Constantly changing the game and the rules of the game … Global Cooling became Global Warming which became the innocuous Climate Change now it’s Climate Disruption…
What was previously something we could measure … like Temperature or Sea Level… can now be anything.. Progressives can point to any abnormality worldwide and call it “Climate Disruption”… temperature and sea level .. discrete measurements no longer matter…
I really hope Mark Steyn uses your flipping graphics (that is not an expletive), to the tune of Hide the Decline parody.
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
Hey if you are a progressive and a “believer” than the truth matters not only the cause in important — most progressives are nothing more than Lemmings running for the cliff
In other news, the “settled science” has made a new discovery!!
It appears that the “settled science” crowd now “thinks” that the “oceans eat the missing heat” on a 30 year cycle. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-28870988
Pity that the “science is settled” was declared so long before….
The solar-induced cause of global warming started in 1936, the first year of the Modern Maximum in solar activity, that lasted for 68 years, when the average annual group sunspot number was 44.7% higher than the previous 187 years. It is no surprise then to see Arctic ice melts thereafter.
Dear Steven- Just wonderful, so funny I was hugging myself.
It will get to the stage where you have a books worth, worth self printing and getting out there, i know several I would like to send to.
Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog and commented:
I have no idea how these folks expect to avoid being caught. I suspect they know there will be no consequences. The truth sure won’t do them any good.
Kirt
Not that i am defending NASA, but this article doesn’t prove anything. I could just as easily post a few random headlines and an email fragment without any context to make a point about anything. It would still be poopycock though, just like your article.
Sorry. I can’t fix stupid.
What’s a “poopycock”?
A phallic made out of excrement.