Scientists Predict Nine Degrees Warming In The Next 24 Years

Ellensburg Daily Record – Dec 7, 1988

ScreenHunter_2970 Sep. 22 02.10

Ellensburg Daily Record – Google News Archive Search

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Scientists Predict Nine Degrees Warming In The Next 24 Years

  1. Steve Case says:

    (between 4 and 9 degrees in the next 50 years.) Fahrenheit or Celsius?

    Well anyway, we’re over half way through the prediction, and it hasn’t begun to happen yet

    • BallBounces says:

      Actually, it’s six degrees of Kevin Bacon, and three degrees centigrade. The increased heat is expected to make Bacon sizzle.

  2. philjourdan says:

    Cracker Jacks really should stop giving out science degrees in every box.

  3. Andy DC says:

    With expert data manipulation from leading climate scientists, along with a fair measure of interpolation and extrapolation, 9 degrees should be no probem at all!

    Heck, the “official” reading for Washington, DC already comes in as much as 9 degrees warmer than my car thermometer, at 2 PM on a clear day. The predicted warming has already been achieved. No task is too daunting for our fabulous climate experts!

  4. Mike says:

    I heard the same thing 25 years ago in my high school science class. Still waiting.

  5. mjc says:

    Back during the big ‘sugar is evil’ kick, one of the evils that sugar was supposed to cause was impaired mental functioning…in other words stupidity. Well, sugar is a carbon compound and using the same ‘logic’ that reduces CO2 to ‘carbon’; sugar can be called ‘carbon’, too.

    Therefore, ‘carbon’ causes rank stupidity…and the idiots must be forgiven, because they are just suffering ‘carbon’ poisoning. (But then again, pot smoke contains a fair amount of carbon monoxide…which is confirmed to cause mental impairment and other neurological problems including brain cell death…)

    • nielszoo says:

      Here you go… I love this one: Carbon Free Sugar.
      Silly me. I learned that without carbon sucrose (C12H22O11) was 11 molecules of water.

      • Gail Combs says:

        I ran across that one a while ago and nearly bust a gut laughing when I say it.

        If the sugar is “carbon-free” in the econut sense of the phrase then it was produced by slave/serf labor instead of by machines.

        None of these spoiled rotten idiots living in fantasy land have figured out that if you get rid of cheap energy you end up substituting animal or human labor. Since they are also Animal Rights Activists that leaves human labor.

        A friend while in school was asked. “Who Freed the slaves?”

        His answer was James Watt (not James Gaius Watt.)

      • philjourdan says:

        That goes well with dehydrated water.

  6. there is no substitute for victory says:

    What Domino Sucrose means is that they burn their sugar cane residue in huge industrial ovens to produce both the steam heat and electric power needed to refine cane juice into sugar. Neutral CO2 just means that they don’t have the need to burn coal, fuel oil, or Uranium to refine their product. What happens to the 11 atoms of Carbon in every molecule of sugar after it is consumed by their customers is best left to the imagination.

    Now if they claimed NEGATIVE Carbon that would really be something to write home about.

  7. Jimmy H says:

    I went to the link. The paper that day also showed Roy Orbison’s obituary. Should we believe that? Or is he hanging out in Vegas with Elvis?
    I think Roy has their motto. ” anything you need, You Got It”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s