Erasing The Unanimous Consensus

Before Mikey erased the MWP and LIA, there was “no question” they existed.

ScreenHunter_4169 Oct. 28 10.29

TimesMachine: February 16, 1979 – NYTimes.com

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Erasing The Unanimous Consensus

  1. nielszoo says:

    We need to get Winston some more help. He’s gotten behind in fixing all those historic newspaper stories and it appears that the truth is outrunning him and his spiritual kin.

    • omanuel says:

      Each lie requires 2.5 more to sustain it, as a chain of nuclear fission events must release 2.5 neutrons to sustain the chain of fission reactions until the whole nuclear bomb explodes.

      Such will the fate of the government lies that began in 1945 to save the world from nuclear annihilation:

  2. darrylb says:

    Getting rid of the MWP was crucial to the alarmist plan because with its presence all of whatever warming we have had would be called into question.
    Therefore in the third IPCC report the hockey stick was the gift of the century to the alarmists.
    —and the gatekeepers protected it with every brutal method at their disposal.

    • rishrac says:

      Their reply was that it was only local and not world wide ( I sound like a parrot) It has since been shown that it was world wide, along with the LIA. The settled science is that co2 doesn’t explain either event, nor do the IPCC models, nor does the IPCC attempt to explain them. In fact, according to the IPCC, temps and co2 levels were both fairly constant during those time periods (consult the hockey stick chart) . Without being able to explain the recent past it is really hard for the IPCC to say with any certainty, in the scientific realm, that co2 is a planetary driver of temperatures. Politically, we’re off to see the Wizard. Hi ho hi ho it’s off to get a grant we go.

      As temps continue to level off or even decline, data tampering becomes harder, ( How far down can they take the temps down in the past) and cherry picking dates becomes problematic. With the rise in Arctic ice, cherry picking a downward trend in ice levels has become the norm instead of owning up to the prediction the Arctic to be ice free in 2013. Or even mostly ice free. Ice is growing which from their point of view has to be unexpected. I wonder if the current expedition to do fly overs is looking for the polar hot spot not showing up on satellite data. I can tell you what their report will say. ” We found the conditions in the Arctic consistent with global warming. More warming means more ice.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s