Understanding Obama’s Breakthrough Climate Deal

China increases emissions for at least 16 years, or until the deal is forgotten in about six weeks.

Bv_P5UpCIAApdDm

US decreases emissions

ScreenHunter_4700 Nov. 17 09.15

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Understanding Obama’s Breakthrough Climate Deal

  1. Matthias says:

    Two pictures that deliver the complete message…
    Great!
    Rgds from Chile

  2. R. Shearer says:

    I happened to pass through Beijing during APEC last week and the air was amazingly clear. They had shut down most factories and limited vehicle traffic. Emission controlls will work wonders.

  3. philjourdan says:

    It was no deal. Obama agreed. He can best fulfill his agreement by stopping his CO2 production. Unfortunately, that would put Biden in the White House. So we are screwed either way.

    • We should have limited continuing funding resolutions with restrictions on INS, EPA, etc with hearings of every scandal involving Obama & the DNC in both houses until the General election. No new laws & regulations with non-stop flogging would be fine with me.

  4. omanuel says:

    Obama is China’s friend. Unfortunately, he is not a friend of the American public.

    • darrylb says:

      More than China’s friend, he is simply in bed with the greens at all costs. He still will block Keystone even though there is no rational reason and many reason to proceed with it including jobs and being amicable with our friend and neighbor to the north.
      Two of the tragedies of the entire AGW charade which are not being considered often is that real environmental concerns and appropriate action are overlooked and secondly in the future scientists with integrity that present genuine concerns with honest and correct degrees of concern will not be trusted.—- Crying wolf is bad and in particular is to be avoided in scientific doctrine.
      As a caveat, I do believe there are many scientists who work tangentially to the warming science, who assume the doctrine is correct and simply add to it.
      In particular those observing changes which are real and have been real since the beginning of the little ice age. They are simply too lazy and perhaps too concerned with their own career (publish or parish) to step back and take a long honest look.
      –That is why scientists like William Grey (sp?) should be given special honors.

  5. Truthseeker says:

    No, no, no, Tony. You have to use a photo of a power plant when the sun is in the right position and you can see the water vapour rising from the stacks and you can point to it and say … “dirty!”.

  6. mitigatedsceptic says:

    Without USA & China coming to some agreement, however feeble,the upcoming Paris Conference will run on the rocks and Omama would share the odium. Now he can retire without worrying about his green credentials and yes, of course he will block the pipeline and get a round of applause from the greenies. The Paris event is crucial to the survival of Agenda 21 and ‘sustainable development’ which means destroy the industrial West and keep the Third World at bay by removing the reasons for envy.

  7. oeman50 says:

    Looks like the Rawhide Energy Station near Fort Collins.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s