Climate Buffoon Of The Day

Check out this world class clown. He wrote a hit piece against Jim Inhofe over climate, then when I asked him a climate question, he said he doesn’t know anything about climate

ScreenHunter_4722 Nov. 18 22.52

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Climate Buffoon Of The Day

  1. Odin2 says:

    That was funny. Boslough is pretty lame.

  2. Mark Luhman says:

    Good play, funny how the buffoons are so easy set up!

  3. dmmcmah says:

    Mark Boslough works at Sandia labs.

  4. David A says:

    Tony, I very much appreciate you engaging the proponents of CAGW.

    I wish all skeptics would, as long as they concentrate on what is clearly wrong with the IPCC, on the benefits of increased CO2, and not on thermodynamic debates other then the wrong models.

    This graphic, should be handy to all skeptics. They (CAGW advocates) avoid it like a vampire avoids holy water)

  5. Anto says:

    Thanksgiving’s come early. What a turkey!

  6. omnologos says:

    yeah right….why would a physicist understand anything about the physical world!!!

  7. Jim Inhofe is a politician, but he took the time to learn about climate physics. Here we have a physicist who thinks that climate physics has nothing to do with physics. What a drooling imbecile.

  8. philjourdan says:

    Well, he is an honest idiot.

    • Gail Combs says:

      No he is a typical Arrogant Idiot. Many, once they have a PhD, think they know everything about anything and their word on any subject is gold. I have had more than one knock down drag out fight with PhD chemists who were dead wrong because they were spouting of about something outside their field.

      Unfortunately I can not find the actual words Boslough said about Inhole.

  9. jdseanjd says:

    I looked at the vampire graph & burst out laughing !
    Keep it up Steve :).

  10. Justa Joe says:

    That Boslough character avoided any semblance of a fact and just spewed invective and ad hominem. WHENEVER these types are challenged their first and last resort is to call names. This guy is Gruber like in terms of arrogance, and this comes after we have the example of Gruber to not follow.

  11. Bob Knows says:

    The shadow of the camera vehicle did not stay the same length as the sun moved behind it. A conclusion would be that the sun is higher in the foreground than when it is behind the camera vehicle. And, the sun is higher on the right foreground side of this video than on the left side.

  12. Dave N says:

    Just read Boslough’s article. Ironically, he behaves exactly the same way that he claims Inhofe is: Boslough makes a bunch of claims without providing one bit of evidence.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Worse he hasn’t even done any actual research into what ‘Deniers’ are saying and if they have any evidence to back it up. The Salem Witch trials had more evidence for their conclusion than Boslough.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s