Nobel Laureate Is Astonished By The Ice-Free Arctic

ScreenHunter_4926 Dec. 05 03.14

Gore: Polar ice cap may disappear by summer 2014

It was actually Gore’s credibility that melted away in 2014.

ScreenHunter_4907 Dec. 04 07.58

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Nobel Laureate Is Astonished By The Ice-Free Arctic

  1. rah says:

    “It was actually Gore’s credibility that melted away in 2014.” Only for those that believed he ever had any in the first place. Gore needs to put his mouth in a “lock box”.

  2. Phil Jones says:

    Gore will never be held accountable for his predictions…

    Gore will never be asked to return His Nobel Prize… no matter how cold it gets…

    Gore??… the Media will never report this frozen Arctic… they claim ice loss… dead Polar Bears… and dying Walrus’s…

  3. omanuel says:

    Al Gore, the UN’s IPCC and the worldwide network of National Academies of Sciences speak on behalf of the exceedingly selfish and intelligent force that agreed to rule the world in 1945 to save themselves and the world from annihilation by forming the UN and forbidding public knowledge of the source of energy in cores of heavy atoms like uranium and plutonium.

    1. This information was forbidden to the public after WWII:

    Click to access Solar_Energy.pdf

    2. Aston’s 1922 Nobel Lecture and unreported CHAOS and FEAR of worldwide nuclear annihilation in Aug-Sept 1945 convinced world leaders to form the UN in Oct 1945 and forbid public knowledge of the source of energy in cores of heavy atoms – Neutron Repulsion:

    Click to access CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf

    3. Here is society’s torturous path from the end of WWII to Climategate:

    Click to access From_WWII_to_Climategate.pdf

  4. philjourdan says:

    His credibility melted away back in 2000. It was only the Gruberites that still slavishly think he has any.

  5. Scott says:

    He said “May”, which means it may not……

    Just like the cow may jump over the moon, and if you say it in a serious voice, some people might believe you….

    Just like he may say there is no man made GW, may give back his Nobel prize and may return the 200+ million$ he has made off GW.

    • Beale says:

      Any of a vast number of things, good, bad, or indifferent, may happen in the sense that it wouldn’t violate any known law of nature.

  6. Baa Humbug says:

    He was only “half” of a Nobel winner. The other half went to another filthy obnoxious carpetbagger.

    • omanuel says:

      I have known personally winners of the Nobel and the Crafford Prizes in nuclear and space physics and stable isotope cosmochemistry.

      Unfortunately a careful study of their work reveals a common thread of unscientific adherence to lock-step, but false government dogma, . . .

      about the standard nuclear model and the standard solar model . . .

      Much as George Orwell predicted for the future of science in a book he started writing in 1946: “Nineteen Eighty-Four” !

  7. Mudder says:

    Steve – Speaking of ice, what’s your take on this recent article? Lots of assumptions and wrong starting arguments…

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/historic-thaw-in-antarctica-may-have-major-effect-on-coastal-cities/ar-BBgl755?ocid=mailsignout

  8. Well, at least the Arctic isn’t losing a Mount Everest of ice every 2 years.

    http://www.ibtimes.com/antarctic-glacial-melt-fastest-melting-region-losing-mount-everest-worth-ice-every-1736059

    How many Manhattans is that?

  9. TimoH says:

    All ice melted away in the imagination land and manbearbig drowned.

  10. Send Al to the Pole says:

    In Gore’s comments:
    “….experts…. in the science of ice” The science of ice? Is this singular phase change now an area of study?

  11. Billy Liar says:

    I wonder what the ‘experts in the science of ice’ are feeling now – apart from their fat wallets?

  12. Sparks says:

    Money driven science.. hahaha

  13. Hugh K says:

    Every climate science prediction the sex poodle made has failed.
    There’s your scientific consensus.

  14. Marsh says:

    I agree with most of the comments here; AGW is a farce of some kind; CO2 hypothesis is flawed!
    In the fullness of time, the propaganda, public panic and extortion will become clear in evidence.
    We have witnessed the nonsense like Global Warming is causing Colder Winters & Ice at Poles?
    All of us have observed Climate Gate issues : altered Data to fit CC models ; that is plain Fraud.

    I for one , do not believe the key proponents of AGW should be able to walk away unscathed;; they have been more than a Public Nuisance ; they have committed a Crime against Society!
    The Australian Government is the first to throw out this Climate Change doctrine and sacked every body on that Gravy Train! How long will it take, for the rest of the World to wake up?

  15. Brian H says:

    2014, +/- 1,000 years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s