Spectacular Malfeasance From The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist

Hansen wanted to show a non-existent increase in sea level rise rates, so he simply cheated by tacking on a different measurement system after 1993 –  and throwing in a completely fake Global Isostatic Adjustment in the post 1993 data.


SL.1870-2014.gif (664×421)

This graph bears no resemblance to the actual slow down in sea level rise which has occurred since 1954.

On the decadal rates of sea level change during the twentieth century
S. J. Holgate1
Received 17 October 2006; accepted 21 November 2006; published 4 January 2007.

[1] Nine long and nearly continuous sea level records were chosen from around the world to explore rates of change in sea level for 1904 – 2003. These records were found to capture the variability found in a larger number of stations over the last half century studied previously. Extending the sea level record back over the entire century suggests that the high variability in the rates of sea level change observed over the past 20 years were not particularly unusual. The rate of sea level change was found to be larger in the early part of last century (2.03 ± 0.35 mm/yr 1904 –1953), in comparison with the latter part (1.45 ± 0.34 mm/yr 1954 – 2003). The highest decadal rate of rise occurred in the decade centred on 1980 (5.31 mm/yr) with the lowest rate of rise occurring in the decade centered on 1964 (1.49 mm/yr). Over the entire century the mean rate of change was 1.74 ± 0.16 mm/yr.

Citation: Holgate, S. J. (2007), On the decadal rates of sea level change during the twentieth century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L01602, doi:10.1029/


As usual, our top climate scientists are committing fraud in order to keep their funding coming iun.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Spectacular Malfeasance From The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist

  1. omanuel says:

    That is the way modern consensus science works inside the MATRIX OF DECEIT that obscures reality.

    The Matrix was built in 1945 because [1]:

    A. Aston’s PROMISE & WARNING to society about nuclear energy on 12 Dec 1922

    B. Unreported CHAOS and FEAR of nuclear annihilation in Aug-Sept 1945

    C. Formation of the United Nations in Oct 1945 to save the world by forbidding public knowledge of the energy – in cores of uranium and plutonium – that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 Aug 1945 and 9 Aug 1945, respectively.

    However, while standing in the ruins of Hiroshima in Aug 1945, the late Professor Paul Kazuo Kuroda had already realized that the nuclear force [2] that powers atomic bombs and nuclear reactors is also the one that made the chemical elements and gave birth to the world (See past paragraph on page 2 of Kuroda’s book [2].)

    After moving to the United States, Kuroda also reported that natural nuclear reactors operated spontaneously on Earth and continued to make chemical elements here as recently as two billion years ago. The famous Hungarian Professor of Nuclear and Radiochemistry – Dr. Tibor Braun – recently described the importance Kuroda’s 1956 discovery in “The Nuclear Chemist Who Foresaw the Past: Paul Kazuo Kuroda and the Oklo Paleoreactors” [3].

    Will the Matrix of Deceit survive public awareness of these facts [1-3]? They are supported by empirical evidence the same source of energy in cores of uranium and plutonium powers the core of Jupiter [4] and the Sun [5].


    1. Aston’s Promise & Warning in Dec 1922; Unreported CHAOS & FEAR in Aug-Sept 1945

    Click to access CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf

    2. P. K. Kuroda, The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982, 165 pages) http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Chemical-Elements-Oklo-Phenomenon/dp/3540116796

    3. Tibor Braun, “The Nuclear Chemist Who Foresaw the Past: Paul Kazuo Kuroda and the Oklo Paleoreactors” (2013, 4 pages)

    Click to access A_nuclear_chemist_who_foresaw_the_past_Paul_Kazuo_Kuroda.pdf

    4. J. M. Herndon, “Internal heat production in hot Jupiter exo-planets” http://www.nuclearplanet.com/astro-ph%200612603.pdf

    5. Oliver K. Manuel, “Solar energy,” Advances in Astronomy (submitted 1 Sept 2014) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy.pdf

  2. exmaschine says:

    Reblogged this on The Road to Revelation and commented:
    Very grateful to have people like Steve who take the time and effort to do the research to expose the FRAUD and LIES of the U.S. Fourth Reich. A government so corrupt, so criminal, they make the Third-Reich’s Ministry of Propaganda look like grade-school finger painting and ranting…

  3. omanuel says:

    My entire professional career, from the time Professor Paul K. Kuroda assigned my research topic on the Origin of the Solar System and Its Elements” in 1960 to today has been a road to Revelation that:

    The Beginning of the World was just like the Destruction of Hiroshima

  4. Steve Case says:

    Hansen isn’t the only one, Church & White did their share of data correction deletion and editing

    I made that graph from the PSMSL data and info from Church & White’s website where they post which stations they used and which ones they threw out or edited

  5. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    If Hansen was and “honest” scientist he would be able to admit that some of his work was premature and the models he developed might not apply to the earth as closely as first expected. If he doesn’t do something like this soon he will destroy what left of his reputation and the good work that he did do!

  6. Sparks says:

    I wish the world was warmer and more tropical in the northern hemisphere, but that doesn’t make it science. Good things never do.

  7. Church and White are fraud central

    • Steve Case says:

      There are over 1200 tide gauges listed at the PSMSL web site. Church and White only used a little over 500, they tossed out over 700.

  8. markstoval says:

    The central problem is one of politics and propaganda.

    It is obvious that Jim Hansen has commented many counts of scientific fraud and has lied to congress on many occasions. But if the mainstream media or powerful politicians will not point that out to the public then it is as if it never happened. To a logical man, the fact that Jim Hansen lied about the rise of the sea level then we know he would lie about anything and probably has. To the man in the street — he only knows that Jim Hansen was a big shot at NASA. (if he knows the name at all)

    The central problem is how to spread this information to the “man in the street”.

    • Tel says:

      Why not go ask the man in the street?

      Every survey shows he does not give a rat’s backside about any “Global Warming”.

      • markstoval says:

        I agree that the man in the street “does not give a rat’s backside” about the issue. But he needs to care as the government is seeking to wreck our carbon based economy in the name of this delusion over the “magic molecule”.

  9. emsnews says:

    Oh, but he or she WILL give a rat’s ass when the brownouts begin during cold spells and the price of heating the home shoots upwards even more!

    • Gail Combs says:

      At which point the Democrats will blame it on the “Greedy’ Electric corporations and seek to nationalize the industry. If they succeed whats the cost of electric REALLY sky rocket as the system becomes even more broken.

  10. Tony is looks like your cue stick is broken in 2 places. National Geographic must have published it when the cue stick was only broken at 1992:

  11. Steve Case says:

    Besides Church & White, and besides Dr. Hansen, there are the adjustments the Sea Level Research Group at Colorado University has made to the satellite record:

    If you go to the Internet Archive’s WayBack Machine:
    and plug in the URL for Colorado Universty’s Sea Level Research Group
    You will find records that go back to 2004. The earliest functional “mean sea level time series” link is from March 27th of that year, and if you follow that link through to “Inverted Barometer Applied” and “Seasonal Signals Removed” and click on text
    you will find the data as it existed for 1992.928 thru 2003.842 It’s then rather simple to download the series into Excel and find the slope. It comes out to be 2.6 mm/yr. If you then go to Colorado University’s Sea Level Research Group today and download the “Raw data (ASCII)”
    You will find that the same series for 1992.96 through 2003.846 comes out to be 3.5 mm/yr.

    Somehow over the last ten years the data has been changed. What had been 2.6 mm/yr in 2003 is now 3.5 mm/yr. An increase of 0.9 mm/yr. If you ask Colorado University about these changes they say:

    “The sea level time series release from 2004 is over eight years old, and in that time many parts of the TOPEX and Jason-1 processing have been updated to reflect instrument and ancillary data improvements. Without recreating each processing change over the last eight years, We cannot point to any specific update that is the main cause of the differences between the 2004 and the current release. But a partial list of the more influential updates include:
    – updated orbits
    – updated radiometer corrections
    – updated tide models
    – updated sea state bias models
    – updated dynamic atmosphere

    “A review of the release notes shows how we continually apply what the altimeter science community considers to be the most up-to-date set of processing parameters.”

    It all boils down to the obvious conclusion that the historical data has been rewritten.

    • Billy Liar says:

      Obviously Winston Smith is alive, well and very busy at Colorado University.

      From Wiki:

      Winston Smith works as a clerk in the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth, where his job is to rewrite historical documents so they match the constantly changing current party line. ‘1984’ George Orwell

      The only difference in Colorado university is that the party line is ever upwards!

    • agfosterjr says:

      They decided to measure sea level from the bottom of the ocean rather than the center of the earth. That way you can blame GIA on CO2. –AGF

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s