Blatant Lies From The Union Of Criminal Scientists

Check out these wildly fraudulent claims from the Union of Concerned Scientists Criminals

Dangerously hot weather is increasing in the Midwest

The report looked at changes in summertime weather patterns using information dating back to the 1940s and 1950s.

The study focused on weather systems called air masses — vast bodies of air overhead that define the weather around us. Specifically, it explored how dangerously hot summer air masses and cool, dry summer air masses have changed in frequency over the last 60 years.

The report also examined how the average daytime temperatures, humidity levels, and nighttime temperatures within different types of weather systems have changed over time.

Key findings include:

Heat waves lasting three days or more have become more common over the last six decades. St. Louis has approximately four more three-day heat waves each year than it did in the 1940s.

On average, hot humid days have increased more rapidly in frequency, while hot dry days have increased in temperature more rapidly across the Midwest since the 1940s and 1950s.

Heat in the Heartland: 60 Years of Warming in the Midwest (2012) | Union of Concerned Scientists

In 1936, almost every station in the midwest reached 100 degrees. This year less than 2%. The area of the midwest over 100 degrees has plummeted.

ScreenHunter_5018 Dec. 08 20.39

In the summer of 1936, 18% of maximum temperatures were over 100 degrees. This year close to 0%

ScreenHunter_5017 Dec. 08 20.38

Maximum summer temperatures have plummeted since the 1930s.

ScreenHunter_5016 Dec. 08 20.35

There isn’t one smidgen of truth to any of their claims. They cherry picked the 1940s as a starting point specifically to exclude the hot 1930’s, but even with their cherry pick everything they are saying is patently false.

These people are abusing the good name of science, to steal other people’s money.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Blatant Lies From The Union Of Criminal Scientists

  1. omanuel says:

    Thank you for having the intellect to detect and the courage to report the stark reality facing mankind today.

    Bob Livingston asked, “What transpired to take away our rights?”

    This is my reply:

    1. Aston’s PROMISE & WARNING about nuclear energy on 12 Dec 1922 followed by CHAOS & FEAR that Earth itself might be destroyed in Aug-Sept 1945

    Click to access CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf

    2. Frightened and convinced world leaders to:
    _ a. Form the United Nations on 24 Oct 1945, and
    _ b. Forbid public knowledge of the energy that destroyed Hiroshima, unaware . . .

    . . . that an unusually talented nuclear geo-chemist from the Imperial University of Tokyo – Dr. KAZUO KURODA – had already realized, while standing in the ruins of Hiroshima, that “The beginning of the world was just like the ending of Hiiroshima !”

    Click to access The_Begining_of_the_World.pdf

    This video of Dr. Rachael Osten at Goddard Space Flight Center shows that NASA’s Swift spacecraft has confirmed:

    3. The stark challenge of life @ 1 AU from a pulsar-centered star, and

    4. Who controls our climate @ 1 AU from the pulsar-centered Sun

  2. The real sultans of ignorance are the ones who claim these monthly and seasonal extremes are evidence of global warming. Seasonal and monthly extremes can’t be taken as such because over the span of a year, cold extremes can, and do, balance out hot ones. Only annual data are valid for assessing global warming trends, and these have remained flat for the past sixteen years. There is no way a trend of that length can be attributed to “climatic variability.”

  3. And many will simply believe and worry and support the government’s actions. “The biggest threat facing humanity” and all that crap.
    People seem unable to contemplate that these organizations might have an agenda and that agenda supersedes the truth.
    It’s quite pathetic really.

  4. D. Self says:

    No surprise. Liars lie

  5. Rud Istvan says:

    An extension of the National Climate Assessment 2014 ‘official’ disinformation. See essay Credibility Conundrums in ebook Blowing Smoke, wherein every single weather extremes example in the intro chapter is deconstructed. Every single one. Official US Government ‘blown smoke’ aka knowing prevarications aka deliberate lies. OBummer.

  6. daveburton says:

    The Union of Concerned Scientists has no credibility. [1][2][3][4][5][6]

    UCS member Kenji

  7. exmaschine says:

    Short of hanging the NAZI’S, just keep on exposing these criminal scumbags!

  8. Pathway says:

    I wonder if Kenji approved the report.

  9. Dave N says:

    “Since the 1940’s” is the smoking gun of misinformation, here. They cannot expect to be taken seriously; well they could, but they’d be even more wrong.

  10. gator69 says:

    America is only 3% of the planet, but St Louis is proof of something, or another.

  11. Tel says:

    In 1936, almost every station in the midwest reached 100 degrees.

    You do have to wonder whether it’s entirely accidental that they started the study in 1940?

  12. kirkmyers says:

    These phony “scientists” have so much egg on their face, you’d think they’d shut their pieholes and go into hibernation. But no, they continue to make even bigger fools of themselves with more outrageous and fraudulent claims of a CO2-induced planetary meltdown.

    The Union of Concerned Scientific Charlatans deserves a place next to the Stalin toadies who once pushed the theory of Lysenkoism. What they truly oppose is the market-based economy, which is driven via cheap fossil fuels. They see the CO2 scare as a way to dismantle our capitalist economic system and replace it with a collectivist economy. They are statists.

  13. emsnews says:

    I remember when the Union of Concerned Scientists did actual stuff. The entire left has been hijacked by global warming and I am a liberal who liberals hate because I keep pointing out the errors of that stupid belief system.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s